Ⅰ 急需电影勇敢的心英文影评一篇100到200字就行，要简单易懂的最好是先写的，谢谢啦！
The Review of Braveheart
I am deeply impressed by William Wallace’s courage and the efforts that the Scottish created to resume soverienty.It reminds me of my dream.Dream,whatever it is,really should be pursued heart and soul.Compared to Wallace,I am so lazy and passive.I watched it,giving free outlet to my thoughts and tears.
There are two scenes over which I really feel melancholy.The initial is when Meilun is buried. The same point happened when Wallace was yong,weeping at the death of his father.Tiny Meilun sent him a purple thistle .to console his sorrow.Even so,Meilun is dead now,no a single would send him a purple thist any much more.He has only himself in this world following losing the two persons he loves most.The second one particular is the very first war against England in the battlefield.,in which they were much weaker in regard to weapons and numbers.Confronted with immense difficulties,they had been not afaid,thinking we would drop.Instead,they fighted bravely and confidently.
Life will not usually be what we want. Wallace’s father died when he was a small boy.He did not want this tragedy transpire but it did take place,so he had to accept it；when his uncle came and would part him with his hometown,he obeyed with reluctance；moreover,his heart was broken facing the death of Meilan,but he had to accept it and be strong.Adversity leads to prosperity on situation that we can turn sorrow into strength.
Much as what is stated above,courage alone won’t guarantee success.Wallace’s uncle informed him :”you have to find out to use your thoughts,then weapons.”Being flexiable and conscious is even more critical,that is to say ,you know how to obtain your goal prior to you take actions.Additionally,it is worth notifying that pals are also extremely important in the pursue of dream.A life devoid of a pal is a life with out a sun.Wallace has Hamiss,who accompanied him to the end.
以上为整篇影评，你可以按自己的要求摘取某段或某句，这里的单词也不算很生
Ⅱ 拜托了，急啊！勇敢的心 英文观后感
Hills, bagpipes, mist, the word “Scotland” written along the bottom of the screen – it can only be one place. That’s right, Wales. Nah, only joking – as if anyone would ever make a film about Wales.
Mel Gibson both directed and starred in this tartan-clad epic about William Wallace, the legendary Scottish freedom fighter/terrorist who, even way back in the 14th Century, had already had enough of the English going on about winning the World Cup in 1966. So, armed with just some rocks, a few hundred muck-dwellers and an extremely peculiar accent, he led a nation to fight for freedom from English tyranny. Or something along those lines.
It’s actually fairly appropriate to be so vague about all of this, because nobody really knows all that much about the real Wallace (and most of what we do know comes from a poem). You could spend a lifetime picking apart the historical inaccuracies in the flick, and there would still be those who’d disagree with what you found.
Because of that, how much enjoyment you can get from this 177-minute beast depends largely on your willingness to accept Wallace as a charmer with biting wit and a permanently clean-shaven chin. As the sort of bloke beautiful French princesses would hand over national secrets to simply because of the way he looks at them. Or even just as a guy who doesn’t smell like moss.
The most breath-taking, if gruesome, parts of the movie are the incredibly lifelike battle scenes. Putting them together must have been an immense project to undertake, but you’ve got to hand it to Gibbers – he does it very, very well. He also makes a likable hero figure, providing you can put to the back of your mind the fact that he’s basically playing the original ned.
Personally I find the movie far too long, particularly as parts of it play like a TV advert for the Scottish Tourist Board. In one scene, for example, Wallace sprints to the top of a mountain and just stands there, kilt billowing, for no apparent reason. Anyone who’s ever worn a kilt will of course know that the last place you’re likely to linger is a-top a windy Scottish mountain. Talk about “freedom”!!
2
Long before The Passion of the Christ, Mel Gibson directed another cinematic masterpiece, Braveheart. Filmed against the backdrop of majestic mountains and rolling meadows, it tells the historically-based (yet not entirely accurate) story of William Wallace, a common man’s warrior who led the Scottish people in rebellion against King Edward I, also known as “Longshanks”. Written by Randall Wallace, an American tourist fascinated with a Scottish statue of his namesake, the script collected st in Hollywood for over a decade before Gibson made the brilliant decision to put it on the big screen. Just like The Passion, it’s a decision he would not regret.
Set in the 11th Century, Braveheart catalogues the struggle of Scottish serfs who labor under the brutal oppression of English occupation forces. Amidst these terrible conditions, William Wallace (Mel Gibson) falls in love with Murron MacClannough (Catherine McCormack). Insistent on not sharing his wife (a proclamation by the king gives local rulers “first-night rights” to new brides) Wallace secretly marries Murron. Nevertheless, an English knight assaults her, sparking a fight with Wallace. Fleeing the village, Wallace believes Murron has escaped and will soon meet him at a secret rendezvous point. But Murron is captured and executed by the king’s emissaries.
Angered by his wife’s murder, Wallace instigates a local rebellion, slaughtering all the king’s loyalists in his village. As his rebellion grows, a distraught Longshanks (Patrick McGoohan) dispatches his fabled Northern Army to destroy it. But the heroic Wallace delivers a stirring speech to rouse his men, while deploying an ingenious battlefield trick to defeat the king’s cavalry.
With the power and legend of Wallace growing day by day, Longshanks relies on his daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle (Sophie Marceau) to broker a truce. But Isabelle’s power is limited, and Wallace realizes his people can only win freedom if backed by the Scottish nobles. Their appointed leader is Robert the Bruce (Angus MacFadyen) who vacillates between his own idealistic views and his father’s pessimistic pragmatism. Will the nobles join with Wallace? Will the Scots win their freedom? Only history tells us the answer.
With elaborate costumes, vivid battle scenes, and a noble hero as its focal point, Braveheart is more than your typical run-of-the-mill action movie. Part history, part Hollywood heroism - its timeless idealism strikes a cord with every viewer. In fact, the movie itself led to a revival in nationalistic pride that fueled the successful Scottish independence movement of the 1990s. It’s a testament to the strength and character of the real life William Wallace. A thousand years later, his enring legacy continues to transform the European landscape, and Mel Gibson captures the noble warrior’s passion with an awe-inspiring Academy Award-winning masterpiece.
3
BRAVEHEART is set in Scotland in the 1200s. It tells the true story of William Wallace who was a famous commoner who led his people in a rebellion against the English. The movie is of epic proportions, length and grandeur. We learn the entire history of William Wallace from the age of 8 until his death.
Mel Gibson, in what I found to be his best role ever, plays the grown up Wallace. Gibson directs the movie as well. The story is full of fascinating history of which I knew little. I have a good English history background but was surprised at what little early Scottish history I knew. Wallace wants to live in peace and ignore the English atrocities he has witnessed, but circumstances force his hand, and he declares war on the English. His battle cry is freedom and many poor people follow him in his quest. The story itself is quite compelling, and the script is excellent.
The political intrigue among the Scottish nobles makes you wonder whose side they are on. As the story unfolds, you come to realize that they are only interested in enriching themselves and do not care about their own people. They constantly counsel Wallace to compromise his ideas in order to achieve some lesser, but more practical solution. His vision is a singular one of freedom for his people. I found myself thinking of Gary Cooper in THE FOUNTAINHEAD and the similarity between his role and that of Gibson's. All of the leaders who were the "wisest" urged constant compromise on their rising young stars in both movies.
Actually, the movie most like BRAVEHEART is GETTYSBURG for both had huge and realistic battle scenes with wave after wave of humans charging each other and dying. Of course, many people will compare BRAVEHEART with ROB ROY. They are both about old Scottish heroes, and in my book, BRAVEHEART wins hands down. Finally, you may find yourself thinking of the Judas story from the Bible except here the movie has a plethora of Judases.
One example of the quality of the script is that the writer manages to introce a very funny character without it seeming like merely a plot device, which of course it is. This character is a mad Irishman who steals every scene he is in with his dialog. I laughed out loud many times. Although there was little humor in this serious tale, there was just enough to keep me from ever tiring even though I had to stay seated for three hours.
Too often period pieces seem like merely exercises in style. I found QUEEN MARGOT to be one such movie. Here the wonderful costumes and set decoration feel totally authentic but in a natural way. I felt like I was actually in the thirteenth century where people's faces were frequently dirty and in general personal hygiene was minimal. When they made their kills in battle or in revenge, I could sense how close they were to animals then. The blood would splat on their faces, and they could just as easy have been wolves.
I have been to Scotland many times and it is gorgeous. In a low key but quite impressive way, the cinematography makes one feel the beauty and the isolation of countryside. The music with the recurring and haunting melody of the lone Scottish bagpipe sets a sad and yet serene tone and mood.
BRAVEHEART runs a long, but well worth it, 2:52. I would not want it shorten. It is rated R, but NC-17 would be more appropriate. It is THE goriest movie I have ever seen and that too I would not change because it allows one to vicariously live through what actual battles in that period would be like. Please be warned that you will see almost every part of the human body being chopped off or stabbed in one scene or another. Imagine any physical horror, and there is probably a scene of it in BRAVEHEART. Nevertheless, there was not one scene where I thought the violence was gratuitous. I would let older teenagers see the movie, but would be careful with impressionable younger ones.
4
When pagan Saxons invaded Britain pushing the native Celtic tribes back in the mountains of the west and the north of the country they couldn't have known what difficulties they leave to future generations. One of the difficulties were Scots, though they weren't much affected by the pagan invasion.
Throughout the history, Scots (as a tribe from Ireland was in 360 mentioned by Romans) had a changing luck in battles, whoever they fought. They had had many various allies and fought against many various enemies, including their former or future allies (politics).
Originally based in Ireland, the Scottish tribe later established their kingdom on the west coast and isles of today's Scotland (between years 501 and 503). Generally, they were never good friends with tribes which lived on the isle, called Britannia by the Romans, before them; perhaps because they came from Ivernia, today's Ireland...
The intolerance between the two sides resulted in many battles and rebellions. In 600, 300 Edinburgh horseman were killed by the English, in 1014 king Malcom II defeated the Danes, four years later another victory was won on the river Tweed, at Carham, against the army of Anglo-Saxons (particularly Northumbrians). On the other hand, king Duncan was defeated by the English and killed by famous character of the Scottish history, MacBeth, who is defeated in 1057 by Malcolm Canmore in the battle of Lumphanan etcetera etcetera.
Then, in the year of approximately 1272, William Walace is born in Ellerslie. He is fated to become one of the most important characters of the history of Scots. In age of twenty-five years, he kills sheriff (originally shire-reeve) of Lanark and a revolt is unleashed. Perhaps many Scots were waiting for a leader to emerge, because the same year Wallace defeats the English at Stirling Bridge.
His luck changed when he was defeated at Falkirk in 1298. In 1305, he is betrayed and executed brutally, his head being mounted on London Bridge.
That is a very rough outline of a life so very important, of the life of William Wallace, a thorough Scot, exactly the William Wallace about whom this movie is. His father was killed by the English, his wife was murdered by the sheriff of Lanark (which is a reason why the sheriff ended up equally) - no mercy could have been awaited from a man that had never seen mercy on the side of his enemies.
Braveheart is a heroic epic told compactly and relatively objectively, noticing everything important that most probably happened in the life of William Wallace. After all, it doesn't have to be historically exact - it is a legend and even if it was "only" a legend, it would be a most impressive one.
5
Back in 1995 when I first saw this movie I was wowed, it was a cinematic epic and one which I thoroughly enjoyed.... a few years later when I met my future spouse I was subjected to this movie on a weekly basis and now I cannot bare to watch it.
Anyway back to the movie, if you have been living under a rock and haven't seen it here's the basic story Mel Gibson plays William Wallace a Scottish highlander who leads his people in a uprising against the English monarch.
Now just so you know this film however "based" on historical events is completely inaccurate, Wallace was in actual fact a Scottish Noble (his family was rich), Wallace never had a wife, and the French princess Mel gets jiggy with would've been around 8 years old at the time, the only real truth in the movie was that he was hung drawn and quartered and he lead an uprising...the rest is Hollywood bullsh*t.
I'm giving the film 4 stars because if you are unaware of the historical inaccuracies and you haven't seen it 100 times you will be entertained, its a good movie.
Ⅲ 求勇敢的心观后感一篇，英文的，300字左右
华莱士，终其一生都是一个斗士，一个为了爱情而斗的斗士，一个为了自由而斗的斗士，一个为了国家和命运而斗的斗士。他是一个让人尊敬的英雄。
首先是华莱士他的成长，对他而言，真正的成长是在失去了父亲以后。之前他只不过是一个单纯的小孩而已。当他看到那个小屋里被人吊死的同胞，他只是一种震吓，一般小孩一样惊吓而已。但他父亲哥哥死后，他变得勇敢，敢于直面死亡了，面对他父亲和哥哥的遗体，他变得如此平静。再后来，他叔叔把他带走，说是人要先学会用他的脑袋才能真正的战斗，把他带去接受教育，这个是他的故事的开端，也是他生命意义上的长大了。
其次是他的爱情，这部片他的爱情分成了两部分。一个就是和小时候的梅伦，一个美丽的苏格兰姑娘，一个在他父亲的葬礼后送了一枝花安慰他的人。华莱士求学有成后回来向他求婚。因为当时贵族享有初夜权的原因，他们在森林里偷偷的结婚了，这里可以体现出他的一种反抗的精神，一种本能的叛逆。但他们的爱情没有维系多久，因为梅伦的美丽太耀眼了，贵族杀了梅伦，这是苏格兰和英格兰的战斗的导火线，因为这引发了华莱士的爆发，揭竿而起，各地响应。第二段是与皇后的感情。皇后丈夫本来就是个同性恋，包办的婚姻让她感觉不到爱情的存在，根本没有感情可言。缺乏了爱情的滋润，让为爱情而起的华莱士走进了她的心灵，她自然为华莱士的豪情倾倒了。而华莱士则是在为了自由而奋身博杀，因为失去了梅伦，他一直在为了他的信念作战，皇后的美丽和善良感动了他，两颗干枯的心就这样融在了一起。
Ⅳ 请问谁有《勇敢的心》英文简介，要短，30个单词就好，
What kind of man would defy a king?
Every man dies, not every man really lives.
His passion captivated a woman. His courage inspired a nation. His heart defied a king.
He who fought, fought for freedom.
一部具有深刻民族主义和政治内涵的史诗巨片
一段缠绵而令人荡气回肠的铁血柔情
一部悲壮的血泪传奇
《勇敢的心》（Braveheart），是1995年上映的美国影片，情节根据苏格兰民族英雄威廉·华莱士的事迹改编，梅尔·吉布森担任该片的导演、主演和制片人。
《勇敢的心》获得了1995年度奥斯卡奖的“最佳影片”、“最佳导演”、“最佳摄影”、“最佳化妆”、“最佳音效剪辑”5项大奖。
由于《勇敢的心》的成功，在日后对于同类型的史诗战争片有不少的启迪，包括《神鬼战士》、《亚历山大大帝》、《特洛伊：木马屠城》、《300壮士》等皆有受其影响。
Braveheart is a 1995 Academy-award winning historical action-drama film proced and directed by Mel Gibson, who also starred in the title role. The film was written for screen and then novelized by Randall Wallace. Gibson portrays a legendary Scot, William Wallace, who gained recognition when he came to the forefront of the First War of Scottish Independence by opposing Edward I of England (portrayed by Patrick McGoohan) and subsequently abetted by Edward's daughter-in-law Princess Isabelle (played by Sophie Marceau) and a claimant to the Scottish throne, Robert the Bruce (played by Angus Macfadyen).
The film won five Academy Awards at the 68th Academy Awards, including the Academy Award for Best Picture and Best Director, and had been nominated for an additional five. The film was proced by Icon Proctions for Paramount Pictures and 20th Century Fox.
Ⅳ 《勇敢的心》观后感(3)
《勇敢的心》观后感（精选10篇）
Wallace终究是死了，曾经两度失信的Bruce在阵前对着苏格兰人，深吸一口气，喊道：“你们曾经和华莱士一起流血!”他抽出长剑，“现在，请你们跟我一起流血吧!”苏格兰人振奋了，他们发出了震天动地的叫喊声：“Wallace——Wallace——”于是，他们打得如诗一般美丽，打得一点都不失苏格兰人的面子，为自己赢得了Wallace同样信仰和追求的自由和胜利。
那把无数次在Wallace手中出现的剑插在一大片绿地上，剑柄上红色的绸带一直飘扬到影片的最后，就像是胜利者的墓志铭。
勇敢的心，勇敢地活着。
《勇敢的心》一直被视为一部悲壮的、融合血泪传奇的史诗片，在影片中，人们常常为苏格兰那绵延的山脉、凄婉的风笛和苏格兰人民在贫困痛苦中发出的凄厉呼号所感动，也为华莱士一往无前的精神所鼓舞。威廉?华莱士的精神就如同一面旗帜，指引着苏格兰人民争取到了最后的自由。他做到了，他没有白白牺牲。整部影片围绕的主题是“自由”
，为自由而战，为自由而勇敢，“勇敢的心”指的还有勇于面对自己，绝不背叛自己的真意，那就是真正地活过了，在肉体的死亡中也能得到精神上的永生。我们经常会问自己什么对自己最为重要，我认为华莱士用他最后一句话告诉了我们答案：“Freedom”。
浓郁的色调，时急时缓的音乐，血腥的打斗，坚定的眼神，这便是由梅尔吉普森自导自演的电影《勇敢的心》。电影以英格兰和苏格兰的矛盾为大历史背景，从而向人们讲述了一个主由人公威廉姆。华莱士领导苏格兰人民反对英格兰贵族统治争取自由的扣人心弦的故事。电影将英雄华莱士的形象塑造得很成功，并将其勇敢的心路历程展现得淋漓尽致，让我真正体味到了什么是真正的勇敢。
在影片的开头，我们看到的小华莱士虽然置身于英格兰贵族的奴役之下，但在他的眼里我们看到更多的是纯真，童趣，直到当他第一次看到被悬挂在谷仓里的同伴和乡民尸体时，我们才看到在他单纯的眼里流露出了对死亡的惊恐。紧接着死亡便叩响了他们家的大门，面对父亲和哥哥的死亡。本在开心等着父亲和哥哥归来的小华莱士等来的却是一辆载着他们尸体的马车，他不敢面对，继续做着自己的事来掩饰内心的痛苦，甚至不敢相信这是事实，最终还是在父亲战友的召唤下来到父亲哥哥尸体的旁边，抚摸着父亲那冷冰冰的尸体，任凭泪水噙满眼眶却丝毫没有复仇的躁动。
他必须勇敢的接受这一事实，必须学会面对死亡，让内心强大起来。很多年后当他再次回到这片土地时，他勇敢的追求属于自己的爱情，追求在父亲葬礼上送自己花朵的女孩美伦，并与美伦秘密结婚，出于对英格兰贵族享有少女初夜权的无声的反抗。然而幸福很短暂，美伦的美貌遭来贵族的垂涎，在反抗中被贵族残忍的杀害。这便激起了华莱士内心复仇的火花，开始武力反抗英格兰贵族。随后各地云集响应，势如破竹。与前两次不同的是，在妻子美伦的葬礼上，华莱士没再掉眼泪。因为他明白他是一个男人，可以勇敢的去面对并且对此不再无奈。因此美伦的死让他放弃了回家过安稳日子的初衷，而是勇敢的去追求属于自己属于民族的自由。故事发展到这里，华莱士一直备受亲人爱人离去的煎熬，似乎注定孤苦一人的遭遇让我们深感同情。但我们又看到，华莱士已在痛苦的剥离中正慢慢的成长，一颗勇敢的心开始真正地被历练。
华莱士的勇敢并非是莽撞而是夹有智慧的，这充分体现在两次战役中。面对在英格兰强大的军队，无论是武器装备还是人数，华莱士领导的苏格兰军队都是无法与之相抗衡的，但是华莱士并没有因此而退却而诚服于英格兰国王，相反他让战士准备长矛，在战场上又激励战士大增军队士气，采取分战术，在与敌人浴血奋战后终取得第一次战争的胜利。
第二次战争在华莱士的精心准备之下，利用柏油箭火燃烧敌人侧后方，眼看战争胜负已分，就在观众大快人心之时，故事突然发生了转变，华莱士的同盟者莫纳叛变了，他没有率军加入已杀入重围的华莱士，致使华莱士军队损失惨重，华莱士自己也在战争中负伤，在他冲出重围去刺杀国王时，被一个骑兵拦住，在和骑兵厮打中发现骑兵竟是莫纳，他本可以轻而义举的杀掉莫纳但他没有而是痛苦的躺下了，不为别的只为这种同族间的背叛而痛心，但是这一切并未阻碍他继续反抗英格兰贵族的步伐，接下来便是勇敢的去复仇，去杀掉这次反叛背后的始作俑者，这是对背叛民族行为的惩罚，也是对死去同胞们的交待，这一切虽然有血腥，有残忍，但丝毫没有减退华莱士在观众心中的英雄形象，在观众眼中华莱士反而成为一个集智慧勇气于一身的具有传奇色彩人物。
影片的结局是出人意料但却又在情理之中的，让人意外的是华莱士这个充满神奇色彩的英雄不是牺牲在战场，而是落入英格兰手中被英格兰当局处死。情理之中则是他又一次相信莫纳一伙一提出的联合并单刀赴会，结果他再次被他们出卖，并被押往英格兰法庭被定为叛国罪。这次华莱士表现得很从容，虽然他知道等待他的将是酷刑和死亡。在服刑场上，华莱士面对的是麻木愚钝的民众们对他的不理解和嗤之以鼻，听到的是民众们对行刑者的大声附和，可华莱士似乎并不在乎，此刻在他眼里只看到一个小孩子的笑脸，透过笑脸他似乎看到了希望。在身体受到酷刑的摧残后，他依然不卑不亢，就在最后关头他依然用尽全身力量大声喊出自由二字，似乎是在提醒所有的人，去勇敢的追求自由。
看完整部影片，我想到了我国古代的神话故事《夸父追日》，夸父一生都在追求温暖结果却因此而死，电影的主人公华莱士也因自己的追求而死，但不同的是夸父死后为后人留下的是一片邓林，隐蔽后人。而华莱士死后留下的却是一颗鼓励后人为自由不断去追求的'勇敢的心，激励着他那个时代的人去继承他的遗志而继续努力，同时也激励着我们观众，去勇敢的追求自己想要的一切，正如华莱士父亲梦中对他说“你的心是自由的，去勇敢的追求自由”
华莱士，终其一生都是一个斗士，一个为了爱情而斗的斗士，一个为了自由而斗的斗士，一个为了国家和命运而斗的斗士，是一个让人尊敬的英雄。
首先是华莱士他的成长，对他而言，真正的成长是在失去了父亲以后。之前他只不过是一个单纯的小孩而已。当他看到那个小屋里被人吊死的同胞，他只是一种震吓，一般小孩一样惊吓而已。但他父亲哥哥死后，他变得勇敢，敢于直面死亡了，面对他父亲和哥哥的遗体，他变得如此平静。再后来，他叔叔把他带走，说是人要先学会用他的脑袋才能真正的战斗，把他带去接受教育，这个是他的故事的开端，也是他生命意义上的长大了。
其次是他的爱情，这部片他的爱情分成了两部分。一个就是和小时候的梅伦，一个美丽的苏格兰姑娘，一个在他父亲的葬礼后送了一枝花安慰他的人。华莱士求学有成后回来向他求婚。因为当时贵族享有初夜权的原因，他们在森林里偷偷的结婚了，这里可以体现出他的一种反抗的精神，一种本能的叛逆，但他们的爱情没有维系多久，因为梅伦的美丽太耀眼了，贵族杀了梅伦，这是苏格兰和英格兰的战斗的导火线，因为这引发了华莱士的爆发，揭竿而起，各地响应。第二段是与皇后的感情。皇后丈夫本来就是个同性恋，包办的婚姻让她感觉不到爱情的存在，根本没有感情可言。缺乏了爱情的滋润，让为爱情而起的华莱士走进了她的心灵，她自然为华莱士的豪情倾倒了。而华莱士则是在为了自由而奋身博杀，因为失去了梅伦，他一直在为了他的信念作战，皇后的美丽和善良感动了他，两颗干枯的心就这样融在了一起。
再说说他的战斗，华莱士开始战斗的时候，是因为贵族杀了他的妻子梅伦，可以说是一个简单的复仇行动，但事情一开始就不能再受到控制的，尤其是领导权掌握在一个聪明人的手里。后来，他们起义得到了各地不断的支持，这让人看到了苏格兰的自由希望。一个方面是因为他们苏格兰的人受迫压太久了，再加上华莱士所学的智慧，他们势如破竹，这就很让人，特别是爱德华心慌了。想尽办法招安华莱士，最后还是利用了一个骗局把华莱士抓了。
最后，在砍头台。这里是这部片的一个精华了，思想就是在这里的。行刑前，两个小丑在那里舞尽丑态，让人发笑，但也是说明了英国人的行为恰恰就是两个小丑所为。华莱士就刑，行人对这位英雄扔鸡蛋、烂菜，恰恰说明了国民的麻木和愚昧。后来在刑台上，华莱士受尽了各样残酷的折磨，下面则是一片欢呼声。华莱士就刑前，看到那个小孩在笑，可能这里也是一个希望的延续，把希望寄托给了后人。那声振馈发聋的“freedom”让人久久不能放下思想，激人不断前进。可以说，在刑台这段，是鲜明的对比让这个自由的精神体现的淋漓尽致的。一边是斗士、英雄，一边是愚昧的国民；一边是前进中的先锋，一边是止步不前的落伍者。差距就在这里体现了，代沟在这里产生。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因为这里有可贵的思想——自由。没有自由了你们还能干什么？也许是真的，我们也该好好思量思量。
《勇敢的心》是由导演梅尔·吉布森执导，片长177分钟，1995年5月18日在美国上映。
威廉华莱士童年时，其父、苏格兰民族英雄马索华莱士在与英军的斗争中牺牲，他开始接受父亲好友的指导，学习苏格兰文化和武术。青年华莱士（梅尔吉布森）学成回到故乡，向美丽的少女梅伦求婚，不想梅伦被英军抢去且遭杀害。在广大村民“英雄之后”的呼声中，华莱士率众揭竿起义，并与苏格兰贵族罗伯结成联盟，但不久他发现，苏格兰贵族考虑的只是自身的利益。
英王为缓和局势，派伊莎贝拉（苏菲玛索）前去和华莱士谈判，由于英王只想收买华莱士，根本不顾苏格兰人民的自由和平等，谈判失败，但这一切并不为伊莎贝拉所知。伊莎贝拉归国后发现事情真相，且知晓英王正策划阴招，忙送信给华莱士，而两人的爱情，也在战争与阴谋中悄然滋生。
这是一部经典的影片，曾经观赏过，本次算是经典回顾了。虽然影片的名字叫做勇敢的心，我觉得叫自由更契合主题。当主人公不断强化自由的观念时，我不禁想起那首著名的诗句：生命诚可贵，爱情价更高。若为自由故，两者皆可抛。还想起国学大家陈寅恪给王国维著名那句的墓志铭：独立之精神，自由之思想。
当苏菲玛索出场的时候，我特别后悔前些天对阿佳妮的评价，看完《罗丹的情人》我觉得阿佳妮比苏菲玛索还要惊艳。可能是太久没有看苏菲玛索，印象有些模糊。但是，我错了，再见苏菲玛索，那张脸那双眼，无法超越，永远的女神。
保持那份渴望自由的心。
历史像深夜里浩瀚无际的天空一样，那样纯洁、美丽，使人充满无限的遐思，你看那点点的繁星，装饰着那深蓝色的“幕布”，一闪一闪的，充满着生命的活力。爱我看来，人类几千年的历史就像那浩瀚的蓝天，而那充满活力的繁星，一闪一闪的，它们就是历史长河中无数的英雄，他们那高洁的品格，崇高的人格魅力，伟大的奉献和如传奇一般的人生深深地吸引，感动着我们，使我们久久不能忘怀。
在我看来，英雄注定有着传奇般的一生和令人遗憾的逝去。而威廉也正是一个这样的人。他拥有一个如水晶般透明的心，小心地珍藏着他孩童时期的爱情，他对他的妻子的爱有如火一般热烈，彼此间简单单纯而又热烈地爱着对方。然而他又拥有一颗岩石般坚定的心。当他看到自己的妻子惨死在英格兰人的刀下，他毅然决然地踏上了一条漫长而又艰辛的反抗之路。尽管在一些人看来，那是无稽之谈，尽管在一些人看来，那是一条不归路，但坚定而又勇敢的他还是选择了勇往直前，坚定自己的选择，完成自己勇敢者的游戏。
“英雄”之所以是英雄，那不寻常的，超出世人的一点是有一颗勇敢的心，也许每个人都会坚定地认为自己是一个勇敢的人，但当你直面死亡时，你会怎样呢?或是当你直面受尽折磨而死时，你会直面样呢?拥有一颗“勇敢的心”的威廉在两中截然不同的死法面前，毅然放弃了弱者的选择-服毒而死，坚持直面敌人残忍的蹂躏，只为向凶残的英格兰人证明，苏格兰人是不畏惧死亡的。苏格兰人最终会得到自由的，他那最后的一声呼喊“FREEDOM”为英格兰人唤起了战争的斗志和胜利的希望。
也许，真正的英雄不一定被所有的人所铭记，真正的英雄不一定被所有的人认可，真正的英雄不一定拥有金子般闪耀的一生和一个快乐的绝句，但我相信，真正的英雄一定有一颗勇敢的心。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因为这里有可贵的思想——自由。没有自由了你们还能干什么？也许是真的，我们也该好好思量思量。
信仰是需要代言人的，就像宗教信仰中需要耶稣像和人间的发言人教皇一样，自由需要的是精神领袖。华莱士的出现是一种必然更是一种结果。他死后曾经用过的那把大剑更是继承这种精神上的传扬，就像“神像”，有了他每个人就有了希望，有了他就能集结更多的自由人，有了他就象征了胜利。在最后汉密斯掷出华莱士的那把大剑在天空中划出完美的曲线最后稳稳的插在地上时，胜利已经被预示了。其实不需要后面的旁白我们也能猜得到结局——苏格兰赢得了自由。当你追寻一种事物的信念成为一种执着时，那么他已经成为了一种信仰。
什么是勇敢？是源于自己面对困境，以智慧与毅力为战斗的武器，再把原先狭隘的个人追求，升华为为有着共同遭遇的人的利益而斗争。这样，即便是源于私心，也能为别人所接受，得到别人的帮助，最终唤醒我们沉睡的勇气。原本华莱士只是想回家娶妻生子，过平凡安定的生活，但是他终究被逼上了追求自由的道路。他沉睡的心灵苏醒了过来，也让曾经摇摆不定的贵族ROBERT觉醒，放弃了英格兰的加冕，拔出利剑，带领着苏格兰的平明军队，咆哮着向英军冲杀过去。
闲着无聊，又重温了下勇敢的心这部电影。悠扬的风笛声伴着苏格兰的美景，让人神往。
被结尾华莱士那句“freedom”深深的震撼了，苏格兰确实是一个屡遭磨难的民族。英国的原始居民是凯尔特人；由于英国很早被罗马政府殖民，所以凯尔特人的文明程度很长时间高于欧洲大陆。凯尔特人一开始就被罗马人奴役，随着欧洲蛮族势力的入侵，罗马帝国实力的衰退，罗马人退出了英伦小岛。传说中亚瑟王的原型就是罗马当时在英格兰的驻军军官，因为不愿离去而带领自己曾经的敌人凯尔特人和罗马戍边军团的后裔与入侵的野蛮人盎格鲁和萨克森人作战。在公元七世纪左右，在目前德法一带的盎格鲁人和萨克森人开始入侵英国（他们应该也算日耳曼人的一支），并将凯尔特人逐渐驱逐到爱尔兰和苏格兰一带；直到11世纪的诺曼征服，来自北欧的海盗占领了法国的诺曼并被法王所承认，后来诺曼人占领了英格兰，但由于诺曼人人数太少，所以盎格鲁“萨格森人仍然保存着大量的贵族地主。
所以，在苏格兰广大的老百姓实际是凯尔特人，在勇敢的心里描述的战争就是是早来的征服者苏格兰的盎格鲁”萨克森贵族和新来的征服者诺曼人的战争。苏格兰人经历过3个外来民族的统治和奴役，甚至诺曼人为了吸引更多的英格兰贵族去苏格兰，而颁布了初夜权的法令，令人发指。
苏格兰人从来没有间断过自己对外来入侵者的反抗，但是苏格兰长期以来形成了多个氏族部落，一直没有一个强有力的中央集权统治国家。很容易被入侵者分而制之或以利分化。苏格兰和英格兰的统一，也是贵族间的妥协（苏格兰贵族很多都有两国的封号，墙头草两头倒）民众仍然对英格兰人很仇视，及时是今天也是如此。
虽然威廉“华莱士被认为是苏格兰历史上最伟大的民族英雄之一；但苏格兰人心目中真正的英雄实际是片中那个最后悔悟的叛徒罗伯特。布鲁斯！罗伯特。布鲁斯历史上不仅没有叛变过，而且一直坚持与英格兰斗争；也许有人读过一篇英文课外读物，里面讲一名苏格兰王子屡次被敌人打败；最后逃到一个城堡，在绝望之际看到一支蜘蛛结网，每次都失败直到第七次终于把网结成了；王子受到了鼓舞，重整旗鼓再次战斗终于赢得了胜利。 这里讲的就是在最后为苏格兰赢得独立（也就是片子的结尾）的班诺克本之战之前的传说。
罗伯特。布鲁斯后来成为苏格兰国王，在他死后一名苏格兰骑士带着他的心脏想要埋葬到耶路撒冷；路上经过西班牙遇到和摩尔人的战争，这名骑士在冲锋前举起罗伯特。布鲁斯的心脏高喊”勇敢的心呀，带领我冲锋吧！“ ，最后这名骑士还是牺牲了；第二天一名幸存的苏格兰骑士在尸体堆里找到了罗伯特。布鲁斯的心脏并带回苏格兰丧于一个修道院里；这才是真正的勇敢的心，有个苏格兰的诗人还写了一篇诗来歌颂布鲁斯，其中有一句就是A noble heart cannot be at peace if freedom is lacking 勇敢的心 其实更大程度上应该说的是布鲁斯而不是华莱士，看来国外的电影和国内的也有的拼 ，也喜欢戏说。
;Ⅵ 跪求一偏《勇敢的心》英语作文观后感，要求原创，200词以上带翻译，重谢……
Braveheart was a huge deal when it first came out. I never really watched the film properly until recently. As a frequent cinema-goer since my youth I was not a part of the mid-nineties cultural phenomenon that was Braveheart's release in Scotland. I did turn up at the the cinema, the old Odeon in Edinburgh, but the queue went round the block (the literal term for a blockbuster) and there was no way in hell I was prepared to wait for three hours on a gray September afternoon (a choice I came to regret). Every subsequent attempt since then was blocked. I never rented the video as I didn't want to watch in pan-and-scan. The fact that every single living Scottish person had seen it apart from myself really got on my nerves, and I was quite bitter about it. And then, as the fever died down, I just kind of forgot about it and moved on.
Watching it fully as an alt I think I probably enjoy it more now that I would have done as a teenager. It's certainly a huge epic right up there with the best of them. Mel Gibson captures the pretty side of Scotland wonderfully with his scope photography accompanied by James Horner's bittersweet score. The film never really feels three hours long, the time just disappears.
Nearly every notable Scottish actor (apart from Connery and Connelly) appears at some point. From the brilliant (Brian Cox) to the dreary and pretentious (Peter Mullan). Keep a lookout for Tommy Flanagan too, in one of his earlier roles.
The battle scenes are impressive, but I wish there were more gory. Gibson's first cut of the film was apparently bloodier, I wish it had remained intact. But despite the grim satisfaction of seeing the English aggressors getting splattered the fact that Scotland IS still ruled by England kind renders Wallace's bravery irrelevant. It may have been 700 years ago, but I hate the fact that he ultimately died for nothing. We DON'T have a country of our own, plain and si-mp-le.
华莱士，终其一生都是一个斗士，一个为了爱情而斗的斗士，一个为了自由而斗的斗士，一个为了国家和命运而斗的斗士。他是一个让人尊敬的英雄。
首先是华莱士他的成长，对他而言，真正的成长是在失去了父亲以后。之前他只不过是一个单纯的小孩而已。当他看到那个小屋里被人吊死的同胞，他只是一种震吓，一般小孩一样惊吓而已。但他父亲哥哥死后，他变得勇敢，敢于直面死亡了，面对他父亲和哥哥的遗体，他变得如此平静。再后来，他叔叔把他带走，说是人要先学会用他的脑袋才能真正的战斗，把他带去接受教育，这个是他的故事的开端，也是他生命意义上的长大了。
其次是他的爱情，这部片他的爱情分成了两部分。一个就是和小时候的梅伦，一个美丽的苏格兰姑娘，一个在他父亲的葬礼后送了一枝花安慰他的人。华莱士求学有成后回来向他求婚。因为当时贵族享有初夜权的原因，他们在森林里偷偷的结婚了，这里可以体现出他的一种反抗的精神，一种本能的叛逆。但他们的爱情没有维系多久，因为梅伦的美丽太耀眼了，贵族杀了梅伦，这是苏格兰和英格兰的战斗的导火线，因为这引发了华莱士的爆发，揭竿而起，各地响应。第二段是与皇后的感情。皇后丈夫本来就是个同性恋，包办的婚姻让她感觉不到爱情的存在，根本没有感情可言。缺乏了爱情的滋润，让为爱情而起的华莱士走进了她的心灵，她自然为华莱士的豪情倾倒了。而华莱士则是在为了自由而奋身博杀，因为失去了梅伦，他一直在为了他的信念作战，皇后的美丽和善良感动了他，两颗干枯的心就这样融在了一起。
再说说他的战斗，华莱士开始战斗的时候，是因为贵族杀了他的妻子梅伦，可以说是一个简单的复仇行动，但事情一开始就不能再受到控制的，尤其是领导权掌握在一个聪明人的手里。后来，他们起义得到了各地不断的支持，这让人看到了苏格兰的自由希望。一个方面是因为他们苏格兰的人受迫压太久了，再加上华莱士所学的智慧，他们势如破竹，这就很让人，特别是爱德华心慌了。想尽办法招安华莱士，最后还是利用了一个骗局把华莱士抓了。
最后，在砍头台。这里是这部片的一个精华了，思想就是在这里的。行刑前，两个小丑在那里舞尽丑态，让人发笑，但也是说明了英国人的行为恰恰就是两个小丑所为。华莱士就刑，行人对这位英雄扔鸡蛋、烂菜，恰恰说明了国民的麻木和愚昧。后来在刑台上，华莱士受尽了各样残酷的折磨，下面则是一片欢呼声。华莱士就刑前，看到那个小孩在笑，可能这里也是一个希望的延续，把希望寄托给了后人。那声振馈发聋的“freedom”让人久久不能放下思想，激人不断前进。可以说，在刑台这段，是鲜明的对比让这个自由的精神体现的淋漓尽致的。一边是斗士、英雄，一边是愚昧的国民;一边是前进中的先锋，一边是止步不前的落伍者。差距就在这里体现了，代沟在这里产生。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因为这里有可贵的思想——自由。没有自由了你们还能干什么?也许是真的，我们也该好好思量思量。
望采纳！~~
Ⅶ 谁能用英文介绍下电影《勇敢的心》
《Braveheart》（勇敢的心）
（下面是剧情介绍，我不写观后感）In the middle ages around thirteenth Century, King England" legs" Edward I ruled Scotland for Scotland, as he forced a group of Scotland people against the tyranny of the uprising, result of a young William Wallace lost his father and brother, he is in after the funeral by his uncle and adopted, and as uncle left hometown.
Years later, Wallace alt returned to his hometown of Scotland at this time, still in Edward's cruel tyrant legs under the rule of. The Wallace home is hoping to calm day, farmers living, family, parenthood, and he said of boys and girls Mo Lun ( Murron ) the development of love, and in order to escape the king gave England nobles enjoy female virginity rights unequal treatment, in a secret wedding day night. The next day, Mo Lun was British soldiers and rebel, the local governor to lead Wallace appeared and killed her, who was bereaved of his beloved wife Wallace rose up, and other Scotland people are responding to his wife, Wallace finally killed the chief way revenge.
Soon, Wallace and the villagers formed the uprising army, and have recruited in response to the righteous. They first entered the nobles of England castle, and the castle burned. Along with Wallace's deeds spread, more and more people respond to revolt, and Wallace's army also carry all before one, has won several battles, including the battle of stringer bridge break infantry conquer cavalry superstition and captured England city York city. King Edward I, aware of the seriousness of the situation, personally led a stronger army against Wallace, both in terms of Foucault ( Falkirk ) in battle, however Wallace has been united Scotland noble betrayed, at the battle of Foucault.
In Foucault the battle failed, Wallace began taking hide guerrilla tactics against the British, and the betrayal of the two Scotland noble act of revenge. At the same time, King Edward's wife Princess Isabella was sent as envoy met with Wallace on many occasions to assist, Princess Wallace resistance risk, but also the development of a relationship between two people, the princess even pregnant with Wallace. Subsequently, Scotland noble requirements met with Wallace, Wallace believes Robert Bruce so aristocratic leaders meeting alone, but only to be the father of Bruce and other nobles betrayed, Wallace was captured, and Bruce also officially and father break.
Wallace received the England administration official trials, as long as Wallace admitted treason could be mitigated punishment, but not from Wallace, claims that he never committed to long leg Edward. In a London trial on the square, Wallace suffered various torture still refused to surrender, and even London people have been moved by the courage of Wallace, have cried out the presiding judge for mercy. Wallace uses only the last breath shouted:" free!" ( Freedom! ). In before decapitation, he also trance to see his wife in the crowd to smile at him, and then, in Wallace's hands clenched tokens also loose.
William Wallace was beheaded by his courage, the impact of the Scotland aristocrat Robert Bruce once again led the Wallace men against England, this time they cry out the name of Wallace, and in the end won eagerly looked forward to for a long time free.
希望我的回答可以帮到你（·-·）
Ⅷ 勇敢的心英文观后感
[勇敢的心英文观后感]Let us recall again the side to see the long process of history, how to create heroes, you will find from our own side, a life .There is a direct their shadow. First, the inheritance of childhood Wallace is not natural endowment from the hero, at best, is the future generations of civilians, although his father had led a The small protest, as compared to his later, many of immature, unsuccessful factor. His father was then the representative of the civilian population, he uprising, power lies not in its own class on free awareness and evaluation. Some Sense, he is in the conspiracy of hate and who are loyal to the feudal lords of the country against the conviction, not even defeat Opponents of intent, only to let him know that tyrant, civilians also have the courage to fight. England foot-long expansion annexation to the Scottish territorial ambitions, cloth snared all participants in the peace negotiation of the assassination of the Scottish your People, young retainers were not spared. With tears in his eyes. He finally knows what death is, it is meant losing familiar with the cordial, no longer has sufficient warmth. The film, his uncle put on his chin, said the sentence: "You truth your mother." The meaning of this statement is not as simple as literally, is only the appearance he sighs, only the sense of loneliness and fear Steep The Wallace declare: We are a, you still have to rely on close relatives.It was at that time Wallace explanation: He is one of the sentimental and weak heart.His uncle was a wise man, his brother died more than understanding the purpose and significance of protest. He has to learn Latin Wallace, Tell Wallace, learn how to use weapons, must first learn how to use the brain is more important to God through Latin understand where -- The truth was given to the people free. Young Wallace, of course, not completely understand this, he also constantly immersed in the native land of lost loved ones and seek grief Lane. In the dream his father and dialogue, his father said to him: "Heart is not detention, have the courage to pursue!" This undoubtedly is Health The earliest meaning of life Enlightenment. Wallace\'s uncle with his travels in Europe, he grew up in the maturity only after it will inherit from two ancestors on the Po Your legacy: good sense and courage, with his search for life from the free.Second, the aspirations of lifeOthers audience to participate in the wedding and let him do not realize that, in his country under the rule of the transient beauty, never impossible Emerging from the shadow of torn. No girl could escape long legs invention of the power with the intention of attracting domestic and nobles in Scotland reassuring presence on the land development. Such a person may be deprived of Road privileges, no doubt makes a deeper civilians heavy oppression. White bride no time to put her husband\'s embrace, it was rushed to the suppression of the British aristocracy. The groom in anger in the anti-intent Anti immediately by the sword on the neck-coercive. Bride inner scales choose his life, it Fukai swords hand, The ears of language, the wife finally let the vicious power by force, was forced to enre the pain of killing beloved cutter cut. At such times, the personal anger and resistance are so insignificant.
Ⅸ 电影勇敢的心，英文观后感
I
remember seeing this movie for the first time in late 2003, and I was
impressed. I saw it again last night, and I was even more impressed. The
acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant. For me, all my guesses
were incorrect. Everything that happens in this movie in unpredicted.
The last half hour itself was highly unpredictable, and it had a
powerful message. When a scene was meant to be dramatic, they did a
great job at it. I don't know about everybody else, but the ending did
make me cry. The message the movie sent kept me thinking for a while.
The amount of courage and bravery was inconceivable, there was barely
any faults or anything wrong with the movie. For a movie of 1995, they
did a great job.
I absolutely guarantee this movie to anybody who
enjoys action and war with a bit of drama mixed in. One of the best, or
maybe even the best movie of the 20th century.
19 November 2005 | by Sheldon Eyzenga
(Canada)
Ⅹ 求《勇敢的心》英文观后感
Fighting? What's fighting?!What for? Every man in the world may go to fight,for peace,for freedom,or just for rage. These days I watched some excellent movies which received many awards in their times. Yesterday,I just finished watching Brave Heart.The excellent movie did gain tremendous achievements in those days .For instance,it was awarded Best Cinematography,Best Director,Best Effects, Sound Effects Editing,Best Makeup,Best Picture in Oscar (奥斯卡最佳影片、最佳导演、最佳摄影、最佳音乐、最佳化装五项大奖) and so on. The acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant.Everything that happens in this movie is unpredicted,such as Murron's death,William's participation in the battle,the reneging of Robert which caused by his father actually,and so on. The amount of courage and bravery was inconceivable.I do respect for those heroes's courage very much.However, I was shocked by their unjustice death.They did not deserve so miserable a way of dying!! I hate Robert's father.The old man is really rascal! He broke his son's promise to William not only once,and it's he who brought William to death! Fortunately,the young leader,Robert the Bruce,was able to lead the fight for the scots freedom at last.Thanks for his bravery and justice. In addition,I respect the courage of other captains as well,such as Hamish.They fight for their sire,their grate William Wallace,the macaulish! Furthermore,when Iooked deep into their eyes, it remind me of the fight between Naruto and carra.I was surprised to find the same meaning in the eyes of these brave fighters! I admire them! I am so aflame in my heart after watching the movie that I hardly calm down,let alone to go to sleep... Brave Heart,as valiant as heroes! I will treasure the precious movies up.