⑴ 求英语电影论文
《Alexander》about it. ——《亚历山大大帝》观后感~
I am a student, study more onerous task to all immersed in a pile, thick book of other aspects of knowledge about nature also less. In order to broaden their horizons, when choosing courses, I usually choose some human science classes. Remember when a friend gave high school had a Greek mythology to me, that is, from the book, I see a god of the mind and I've also is the traditional Chinese religion in the image of god is completely different. Greek mythology of the gods of the people who have thoughts, feelings, and the joy of the people, sadness, jealous, have fear. But god is the Oriental religions in, or even omnipotent, is ordinary mortals cannot be achieved. But because those books and the names of the gods and long, sometimes make me confused, I eventually failed to read the book. Myth, of course, is part of the culture of the classical Greek, in order to understand with many Greek mythology, when he saw the ancient Greek culture, when elective without hesitation, I chose. Fortunately, I choose. Through a study of the semester, although no Greek culture and in-depth understanding of ancient Greece, but the experienced periods have probably know for certain period of development, the typical of the political system, cultural phenomenon also have certain knowledge, I think is good harvest. Of course, the teacher said to the final paper to write, I still feel a bit silly, I don't know what good, because although much knowledge of ancient Greece, but to really understand some of the problems one write an essay, I think my knowledge is not enough. Just recently saw "Alexander of Alexander's life", interest, but to know before Alexander, so you have to find some information, and some of the facts is mentioned below from these materials, not do annotation.
Video introction
Alexander the great was about the history of the world's first emperor Alexander conquered Eurasian of life. Alexander BC, in Macedonian king is 3.56 Philip ii, once studied Aristotle, 19 years old father was assassinated succession to the throne. He first, then pacify defeated the Persian empire, began 22,000 miles of conquest. 25 years old, Alexander had established including the Nile valley, dry peninsula and the Ins civilization across Europe in Asia, but the Alexander under age 33 because inexplicable disease die suddenly.
In this film, Alexander the great friend (Anthony Hopkins ptolemaic general) through memory, the emperor's will as life. Forty years ago, Hollywood has taken Alexander, but only about his hero. The new version, full of adventure and dream from the childhood, thrust his parents fight, then the sad for him by Aristotle and mapping lesson, graally to his invicible paving the way to conquer. This is the life of the vivid characterization.
The director of Alexander oliver stone said: "this is probably the biggest challenges in my life, hope can make it much objective." In order to do this, stone is hard. Rafer specially invited professor of the university of Oxford robin Ryan fox as the historical consultant. The fox is research of Alexander the great expert, once wrote biographies of Alexander, sales of more than 100 million copies. He accepted the invitation gladly, but a condition, is to them in the emperor's elite cavalry, and must stand in the front of the team, he "fight" for Alexander dream.
Stone has invited the ancient linguists, tries to make some of the lines to real effect. Language Fox watched the movie said after school and historical scholars should get there watching for discussion.
However, if the movie history book, it obviously lost as the value of the movie. "Alexander" in the context of history, the plot details on again. Films, Alexander's father told him: a woman more dangerous than men, as the king had hurt his lover, Mother kept his place before him, said his father. Without these details on the history, but the parents struggle was mentioned. Alexander, such as wedding night, the bride almost killed him, although not in the historical lee, but the bride was defeated by Alexander, daughter of darius, the plot and have confidence. Therefore, the writer's creation that is reasonable, no violation of history.In addition, the recent history of the new viewpoint about Alexander historiography, more and more absorbed some characters, appear very full.
A pursuit of dreams
Above has been mentioned in the film, and the understanding of Alexander before, so he is the first impression from the movie, here is to put the matter what facts. Admittedly, the film Alexander some arbitrary, even some cold, but sometimes think conversely, if no such a domineering, pride and resolute, he can become a history of Chinese strategists hoyywood hills? However, I want to discuss and not his military command art, but his pursuit of dreams and in the process which reflects personality, it is exciting and amazing. If someone was born, this man is the conqueror Alexander. As a great soldier son, Alexander had been instilled many heroism and high adventure stories. He can reel off in the early lead, read Homer in the shelter of personality and lyrics. Whether in the house or in the battlefield, he had a pillow YiLiYaTe "with him to sleep. He led his Greek soldiers and defeated the Persian empire, strong and continue to crusade. Along the way, he and his army met with human body is similar, but what we know, hair, it is a monkey. They rode on large and those of the east, the elephant who had never seen defeated the monster. Of course, though, Alexander the great personality charm, many of his soldiers to fight for Alexander has faith, but for a long time, the journey of hard driving, the warriors who still alive and tired, they obviously very to return to his country and so on the roster appeared, the army also appeared a mutiny. One section, I is very impressive, when he determined to continue to advance in India, unwilling to part soldiers, one of the important general said a touching, they finally wish is only in them to the soldiers who died superempirical essence and meet them before the meeting, the wife and children. Alexander said: "yes, you're right, I, Ross, negligence. Should I send you back as soon as possible, all pensions from me to send, respected and wealthy, love, in the rest of you will be his wife and son of a hero, finally died peacefully. But your dreams, Ross, you, the simple, early in your child's life with Persia, with gold and silver in your pockets stuffed with you when you love, because it can destroy everything in the life of a man!" , kelat rose that touching words some long, here I will not lead to, but when I'm hearing his words, I was really touched by it and feel a mortal ordinary and true feelings, in my opinion, that he was not too. Then, Alexander the retort that enthusiasm, yes, Alexander and their pursuit of something different, he pursues the sun rays, the pursuit of great, so the life of ease, money and enjoy attractive for him, he defeated the Persian empire, Babylon the great wealth, costly court life and can't baffel him to continue the expedition.
Just after the movie's feelings, then some literatures on Alexander's expedition, some of the objective a detailed analysis. According to the data, Alexander expedition, he himself has said the Persian, and had ravaged sanctuary in Greece was assassinated Philip ii, the purpose is the expedition, revenge against the Persian stronger. But the specific analysis, find the reason for the expedition is just an excuse. Firstly, the assassination of the killer waves Philip ii, paulson and no relationship with the Persian empire. O Nebuchadnezzar, paulson wave is a young aristocrat, he and Philip ii, the generals have personal in Dallas. Whatever wave, is of Nebuchadnezzar's, but he SiYuan what action, really have no direct connection with the Persian empire. Alexander said he was assassinated in Persia, Philip ii, historical records on no. Secondly, from the assassination of Nebuchadnezzar, wave, paulson to Philip ii, so the action in advance of horses prepared assassination scene, it shows that he really otherwise conspiracy. Third, revenge is only according to Greek long-standing extremely extensive mental state, as to stimulate the greeks into the slogan of the Persian.
Anyway, I think it is worth affirmation, Alexander the great dream, in order to realize its can not wealth, enjoy thier rance and courage to explore the unknown.
2 Tim HeFei and about Alexander, RON
Alexander the great films, especially sexual orientation private life a lot dispute. In fact, he HeFei and ask the relationship, and I was at the movies process has been very puzzled, why history so great a character is gay? Believe that many people have the same doubts.However, when I accidentally see teacher site of excellent assignments exploring ancient Greek young titled "love", I feel like a life. For the love of the young this phenomenon from different aspects. First is the ancient greeks aesthetic idea. Ancient Greece is extremely attractive appearance and the worship of strong and handsome figure, in this respect, they don't care, as long as the male sex "golden hair, jiongjiongweishen eyes, ruddy complexion, strong muscle, broad shoulders." He must be able to attract others' eyes and love. Beautiful young completely meet greeks aesthetic standards and, in some cases, the young beauty of man can be less attractive girl. Secondly, the ancient Greek culture condition is the root of young love. The ancient culture and modern culture and the fundamental difference between the ancients to men, women, children in the man's eyes is only the mother and the family business managers. The ancient greeks regarded the spirit of man is the center of activities, they think that the girl was not what ecation, this kind of situation is caused by a woman because ecation condition, the cultural resources, and the spirit world of ancient Greek men spirit grades. This kind of social status can appear a situation: men and women together only flirting with youth, and can be found in the heart. They are likely to rationally between the dialogue lies not only in the young, beautiful, because they have more abundant knowledge and talent. Therefore, in ancient Greece appeared a modern difficult to understand customs: every man have attracted a boy or a young man, and in close daily life as his tutor, guardian and friends, also encouraged him to study all noble character. If any man have deceived than his little boy, will be considered not perform ties of a man, No one can get to a young man of friendship is a shame for. This kind of social and cultural customs in promoting cultural and ideological progress in a little deeper, to help build social moral standards have contribution. We can not surprised to find that most firmly hold the view that homosexuality is the most important and the most influential cultural elite of ancient Greece. At this point, even the spirit of love, Socrates also no exception.
In addition, a professor of the university of Oxford robin Ryan fox in the privacy of Alexander is explained. He said, Alexander has three wives, and his mistress, four grow up together, carry the HeFei partners have homosexual relations, and the one who Persian royal eunuch very close. The fox said, many of these ancient historians recorded the plot, compared with these records could be understatement. While these sparked controversy, because of different age has different view. Ancient Greece, polygamy and homosexuality is normal, Christian Europe, strict monogamy was established, homosexuality was considered evil, so, if we use today's morality to request more than 2,000 years ago, the ancients are serious distortion.
Want to use words to summarize the feeling after see: "bravely to pursue their dreams!"
⑵ 高分 英语论文 电影
什么意思？是关于英语电影的论文吗？
我家倒有一份，是简爱的。
本人感觉《肖申克的救赎》不怎么样，我听过好多人对他的评论都不是很好，比如二楼推荐的像《阿甘正传》那样励志的电影，就是比较有意义的，又好写而且选材也不错。像这样的电影有好多（可以从名著上找）。
我当时选的是《简爱》，因为我很喜欢这不作品。其实5000并不多，只要你肯认真读下去，对作品有自己的简介，再参考一些相关的资料，我相信你会写好的，到那时你就觉得5000是小CASE了。你现在没有读，不去了解，就算别人怎么给你启发你也写不出来。等你读过后再向人请教就没问题了。
⑶ 英语电影或小说观后感（70字）
《哈利波特》英文读后感I've just fininshed reading the first 4 Harry Potter books for about the 5th time through, and they're just as magical and affecting as they have ever been. Everything is in here: suspense, adventure, mystery, humour, danger. There's even some pretty satisfying paybacks. The characters are fantastic and fantastically realistic. There are bad people who turn out to be good guys and good people who turn out to be bad guys, just like life.
I think the thing I like best about these books is the message that it's okay to be different - to be not "normal." I would love for everyone in school to have hear that message. It would probably rece the bullying around the school.
These books value real thoughts. Much has been made of Harry's rule breaking, but only once in the series so far does he break a rule for arbitrary personal gain. Most of the time he makes a decision that what's right is more important than what's written. And you know what? Life's like that sometimes. I think it's great that kids are getting an example of how to do what's right even when it involves breaking rules. The Potter books also show that there are consequences for rule breaking. If not getting caught and getting a detention, then a spell going wrong and someone getting turned into a cat. This shows that when you make a decision to go against the rules that things may not go as you expected and you have to take responsibility for the outcome.
⑷ 求一篇英国著名小说的英文鉴赏论文，400字左右。在线等。急用。
《呼啸山庄》英文读后感
Published in 1847, WUTHERING HEIGHTS was not well received by the reading public, many of whom condemned it as sordid, vulgar, and unnatural--and author Emily Bronte went to her grave in 1848 believing that her only novel was a failure. It was not until 1850, when WUTHERING HEIGHTS received a second printing with an introction by Emily's sister Charlotte, that it attracted a wide readership. And from that point the reputation of the book has never looked back. Today it is widely recognized as one of the great novels of English literature.
Even so, WUTHERING HEIGHTS continues to divide readers. It is not a pretty love story; rather, it is swirling tale of largely unlikeable people caught up in obsessive love that turns to dark madness. It is cruel, violent, dark and brooding, and many people find it extremely unpleasant. And yet--it possesses a grandeur of language and design, a sense of tremendous pity and great loss that sets it apart from virtually every other novel written.
The novel is told in the form of an extended flashback. After a visit to his strange landlord, a newcomer to the area desires to know the history of the family--which he receives from Nelly Deans, a servant who introces us to the Earnshaw family who once resided in the house known as Wuthering Heights. It was once a cheerful place, but Old Earnshaw adopted a "Gipsy" child who he named Heathcliff. And Catherine, daughter of the house, found in him the perfect companion: wild, rude, and as proud and cruel as she. But although Catherine loves him, even recognizes him as her soulmate, she cannot lower herself to marry so far below her social station. She instead marries another, and in so doing sets in motion an obsession that will destroy them all.
WUTHERING HEIGHTS is a bit difficult to "get into;" the opening chapters are so dark in their portrait of the end result of this obsessive love that they are somewhat off-putting. But they feed into the flow of the work in a remarkable way, setting the stage for one of the most remarkable structures in all of literature, a story that circles upon itself in a series of repetitions as it plays out across two generations. Catherine and Heathcliff are equally remarkable, both vicious and cruel, and yet never able to shed their impossible love no matter how brutally one may wound the other.
As the novel coils further into alcoholism, section, and one of the most elaborately imagined plans of revenge it gathers into a ghostly tone: Heathcliff, driven to madness by a woman who is not there but who seems reflected in every part of his world--dragging her corpse from the grave, hearing her calling to him from the moors, escalating his brutality not for the sake of brutality but so that her memory will never fade, so that she may never leave his mind until death itself. Yes, this is madness, insanity, and there is no peace this side of the grave or even beyond.
It is a stunning novel, frightening, inexorable, unsettling, filled with unbridled passion that makes one cringe. Even if you do not like it, you should read it at least once--and those who do like it will return to it again and again
⑸ 【紧急求助】谁能帮忙提供一篇关于《了不起的盖茨比》电影与小说比较的论文的外文文献，谢谢~
邮箱在哪里？
Adaptations in the Classroom: Using Film to "Read" The Great Gatsby
Dennis Cutchins - 2003
⑹ 任何一篇英美短篇小说的英语论文
《呼啸山庄》人物关系结构
Title：
Catherine's dilemma between love and marriage in Wuthering Heights
——The Psychoanalysis of love triangle relationship with Freud’s theory of personality
Abstract：
Wuthering Heights tells a story of superhuman love and revenge enacted on the English moors. In this thesis, an attempt is made to analyze the love triangle relationship which leads to Catherine's dilemma between love and marriage in Wuthering Heights by virtue of Freud’s theory of personality.
Key words：
Wuthering Heights Freud’s theory of personality love triangle relationship
In Catherine's heart she knows what is right, but chooses what is wrong. It is her wrong decision that pushes her into the inextricable [LunWenJia.Com]dilemma between her love and marriage; it is her wrong choice that plunges the two families into chaos. In the mind, she is truly out of her way.
According to Sigmund Freud(1856—1939), the structure of the mind or personality consists three portions: the id, the ego, and the superego.“The id, which is the reservoir of biological impulses, constitutes the entire personality of the infant at birth. Its principle of operation, to guard the person from painful tension, is termed the pleasure principle. Inevitable frustrations of the id, together with what the child learns from his encounters with external reality, generate the ego, which is essentially a mechanism to minimize frustrations of the biological drives in the long run. It operates according to the reality principle … [LunWenNet.Com]The superego comprises the conscience, a partly conscious system of introjected moral inhibitions, and the ego-ideal, the source of the indivial's standards for his own behavior. Like external reality, from which it derives, the superego often presents obstacles to the satisfaction of biological drives.”“In the mentally healthy person, these three systems form a unified and harmon
ious organization. Conversely, when the three systems of personality are at odds with one another the person is said to be maladjusted.” Here Catherine's tragic psychological process may be well illustrated by Freudian psychoanalysis.
“I cannot express it; but surely you and everybody have a notion that there is, or should be, an existence of yours beyond you. What were the use of my creation, if I were entirely contained here？” Catherine's strange words reflect that the intelligent Emily Bronte had been earlier pondering over a same question in her work. What on earth is“the existence of Catherine's beyond Catherine”？
Here we may believe that Heathcliff stands for Catherine's instinctual nature and the strongest desire—her “id” in the depths of her soul; Edgar, her ideal “superego”, represents another part of her personality: the well-bred gracefulness and the superiority of a wealthy family; and she, herself is the “ego” tortured by the friction between the two in the disharmonious situation.
In the light of Freud's theory of personality, “the superego is the representation in the personality of the traditional values and ideals of society as they are handed down from parents to children.” Catherine's choice of Edgar as her husband is to satisfy her ideal “superego” to get wealth and high social position, which are the symbol of her class, on the basis of the ecation by her family and reality from her early childhood. She is a Miss of a noble family with a long history of about three hundred years. Only the marriage well-matched in social and economic status could be a satisfaction for all: her family, the society and even her practical self. “It would degrade me to many Heathcliff now ... if Heathcliff and I married, we should be beggars？” This is her actual worry for her future. Catherine yields to the pressure from her brother, and alike, in truth, she is yielding to the moral rules of society, without the approval and identification of which, she could not live a better life or even exist i
n it at all.
However, Catherine underestimates what her other more intrinsic self would have effect on her. The most remarkable claim by Catherine herself may be the best convincing evidence to distinguish the different roles of Heathcliff and Edgar—her “id” and her “superego”:
“My great miseries in this world have been Heathcliff's miseries, and I watched and felt each from the beginning: my great thought in living is himself. If all else perished, and he remained, I should still continue to be; and if all else perished, and he was annihilated, the universe would turn to a mighty stranger: I should not seem a part of it. My love for Linton is like foliage in the woods: time will change it. I'm well aware, as winter changes the trees. My love for Heathcliff resembles the eternal rocks beneath: a source of little visible delight, but necessary. Nelly, I'm Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure and more than I am always a pleasure to me, but as my own being. So don't talk of our separation again: it is impracticable.”
It was a happy thought to make her love the kind, wealthy, weak, elegant Edgar, yet in submission to her superego to oppose against her id, she would fall into a loss of the self. Since the id is the most primitive basis of personality, and the ego is formed out of the id, Catherine's life depends wholly on Heathcliff， as the whole connotation and truth of her life in the cosmic world, for its existence and further more for the significance of her existence. Heathcliff is the most necessary part of her being. She marries Edgar, but Heathcliff still clutches her soul in his passionate embrace. Although she is a bit ashamed of her early playmate, she loves him with a passionate abandonment that sets culture, ecation, the world at defiance. Catherine's wrong choice for marriage violates her inner desires. The choice is a victory for self-inlgence—a sacrifice of primary to secondary things. And she pays for it.
On one hand, Catherine doesn't find the heavenly happiness she was longing for. Though as a girl “full of ambition”and “to be the greatest woman of the neighborhood” would be her pride, the enviable marriage could only flatter her vanity for a second. After her marriage, the comfortable and peaceful life in the Grange was just a monotonous and lifeless confinement of her soul. She feels chocked by the artificial and unnatural conditions in the closed Thrushcross Grange— a world in which the mind has hardened and become unalterable.“If I were in heaven, Nelly, I should be extremely miserable. ” Catherine eventually knows that the Lintons' heaven is not her ideal heaven. She and Heathcliff really possess their common heaven. Just as Catherine says,“Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same; and Linton's is as different as a moonbeam from lightning, or frost from fire.”
Catherine doesn't want to live in the Lintons' heaven; on the other hand, she has lost her own paradise that she ever had with Heathcliff on the bare hard moor in their childhood. The deepest bent of her nature announces her destiny—a wanderer between the two worlds. When she is alive, she occupies a position midway between the two. She belongs in a sense to both and is constantly drawn first in Heathcliff's direction, then in Edgar's, and then in Heathcliff's again and at last she loses herself completely. Her childish illusion to use her husband's money to aid Heatllcliff to rise out of her brother's power has vanished in thin air. And her constant struggle to reconcile two irreconcilable ways of life is in vain too, which only caused more disorder in the two worlds and in herself as well.
In Freudian principles, should the ego continually fail in its task of satisfying the demands of the id, these three factors together—the painful repression of the id's instinctual desires, the guilt conscience of revolt against the superego's wishes, and the frustration of failure in finding outlets in the external world- would contribute to ever-increasing anxiety. The anxiety piles up and finally overwhelms the person. When this happens, the person is said to leave hallucinatory wish-fulfillment, then a nervous radical breakdown, and in the end may finish the person off. Catherine is destroyed into psychic fragmentation by the friction between the two. At the height of her Edgan-Heathcliff torment, Catherine lies delirious on the floor at the Grange. She dreams that she is back in her own old bed at Wuthering Heights “enclosed in the oak-paneled bed at home, and my heart ached with some great grief…my misery arose from the separation that Hindley had ordered between me and Heathcliff.”Still dreaming, she t
ries to push back the panels of the oak bed, only to find herself touching the table and the carpet at the Grange:“My late anguish was swallowed in a paroxysm of despair. I cannot say why I was so wildly wretched ... and my all in all, as Heathcliff was at that time, and been converted at a stroke into Mrs. Linton...the wife of a stranger: an exile, and outcast.” She attempts to forget the lengthy days of years of life without her soul even in her temporary derangement.“Most strangely, the whole last seven years of my life grew a blank! I did not recall that they had been at all.” Her mental and physical decay rapidly leads to the body's mortal end. She dies and seems to have none into perfect peace.
But even after her death, she is still a wandering ghost. In Chapter 3, Lockwood, the lodger in Catherine's oak-paneled bed at Wuthering Heights dreams about the little wailing ghost:
“The intense horror of nightmare came over me: I tried to draw back my arm, but the hand clung to it, and a most melancholy voice sobbed, ‘Let me in-Let me in’.‘ Who are you?’…‘Catherine Linton’, it replied, shiveringly…‘I'm come home: I'd lost my way on the moor!’…Terror made me cruel; and finding it useless to attempt shaking the creature off, I pulled its wrist on to the broken pane, and rubbed it to and fro till then blood ran down and soaked the bedclothes: still it wailed, ‘Let me in!’…it is twenty years, twenty years. I've been a waif for twenty years!”
Catherine aspires to be back in her heaven even being a spirit. But leer self-deceptive decision has made her fall from her and Heathcliff's heaven full of demonic love and her never docile or submissive nature has drawn her out of her and Edgar's heaven filled with civilized emptiness in the meantime. She pushes herself into her tragedy, the endless dilemma between her love and marriage, which won't end up with her death.
Bibliography：
1.Bronte Emily，Wuthering Heights，Beijing：Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press，London：Oxford University Press 1995
2.Freud Sigmund，Interpretation of Dreams，Beijing：Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press 2001
3.Travis Trysh，Heathcliff and Cathy，the Dysfunctional Couple，The Chronicle of Higher Ecation，Washington，2001
4.Steinitz Rebecca，Diaries and Displacement in Wuthering Heights，Studies in the Novel，Denton，2000
http://www.lunwennet.com/thesis/List_21.html 里面有你需要的英语论文，我载老一篇，不合适切看下嘛，呵呵！！！
⑺ 观看两部英文电影或阅读两本英文小说,写100字左右观后感或读后感。
Pride and Prejudice,one of Jane Austen’s greatest works,was published in 1813.It talks about trivial matters of love,marriage and family life between country squires and fair ladies in Britain in the 18th century.The novel that attracts reader most is the wonderful vivid presentation of characters,especially through their witty and bright conversations.In Pride and Prejudice,people with different characters have different attitudes to love which leads to their various marriages.The three couples,varied in their characters,presented us with three different distinct marriages.
我的论文的一部分哈,贡献给你了.
是英语原声电影观后感,傲慢与偏见
⑻ 英语作文 帮我写一篇看完一部英文原版电影或英文小说后的观后感的英语文章.
Last " receive by Buddhist nun legend inferior " for the first time,from sighing over with feeling to: Only fill childlike innocence, could take so wonderful and strange a film; Only full of childlike innocence, could appreciate that there is not evil and simple world so. First of all, this piece about magic magnificent story of country, background but cruel fierce World War II, therefore much motives of the author's, it be able to be in the happy and auspicious, quiet countryside atmosphere to hope, the flames of war far away from real world, military service, wandering about as a refugee and launching air raids. Certainly, magic country there is evilness too, fight too, this is realistic reflection and refraction too.
Secondly,open fairy tale the worlds door, protagonist in hide-and-seek game at unintentionally inside wardrobe find, such a plot very apt cater to we childhood memory,too suffused with have in mind have in childhood about fairy tale imagination of the world, it is novel to be full of, is full of yearning for. Who have fantasies of, pass beautiful fairyland never? Who never wants to have animal's friend? Who have fantasies of oneself become and save the world hero never? We can say, so pure Meng Tong, owned by everyone.
Moreover, the plot of the story establishes and fully reveals much motives written and directed too. It is likewise magic slice, the darker and uncannier " Harry and Potter " becomes more and more; And theme and content of " lord of rings ", have, suited to epic property that alt appreciate. " receive Buddhist nun inferior legend ", plot it is prominent and evil to set against for development to have, the theme is to help justice to overcome evilness, accord with children world of eyes, have only a simple one good and broken to distinguish the fact. This children inmature lovely at the same time. On the visual effect, the more outstanding one lies in the specially good effect scene that the computer makes, shake regret and stimulate at the conspicuous battle field, accord with to appreciate interesting child too.
Pat" receive Buddhist nun's inferior legend ", need childlike innocence; See " receive Buddhist nun's inferior legend ", need a childlike innocence too. Because,all of us once have dream -like child.
⑼ 急求英美电影欣赏论文（英文的）
Men of Honor
《斯蒂文森小说精华》下卷收录《黑箭》及《绑架》，这两部长篇都是非常引人入胜的历史小说。在介绍二书各自的时代背景以前，不妨让我们先来鸟瞰一下英国历史，它的大脉络，那是很有趣的。
提起英国，人们只知道是个老牌帝国主义，十九世纪首先就是这匹恶狼闯进我们的家园。但是，在不列颠（联合王国除开北爱尔兰）那片土地（约略相当于我国湖南省）上，曾经多少次遭受外族血与火的蹂躏？多少次山河变色、国破家亡？一代又一代，有多少个入侵者、杀人凶犯，又有多少个英奸、卖国贼，最后都成了他们民族英雄和历史伟人，我们中有几位能够说了然于胸呢？一笔一笔血淋淋的陈年旧帐，整个的英国历史我们可以大体上概括为：三次种族大换血，三次沦为殖民地（即文化大换血或输血），三次开门揖盗，引狼入室，认贼作父——其中两回全国都成了我们中国的吴三桂。这就是一部英国史！
大约距今九千年以前，不列颠诸岛与欧洲大陆还是连成一体的，那里居住着中石器时代的地中海人和阿尔卑斯人。约五千年前，伊比利亚人自地中海地区西迁，是首批从大陆渡海过来的，征服了原有的居民。这次征服必定十分野蛮悲惨，使我们已经找不到任何中石器人的痕迹了。著名文化古迹索尔兹伯里平原上的怪石圈，就是伊比利亚人留下来的。是为第一次换血。
到了约两千五百年以前，有凯尔特人自今天德国南部一路砍杀过来，先后占领了今日法兰西、西班牙、葡萄牙、意大利等地，接着又越海占据了不列颠诸岛，残酷屠戮伊比利亚人。是为第二次换血。
自公元一世纪中叶，罗马帝国对不列颠进行了长达四百年的殖民统治。政府、法律和商业都使用拉丁语，只剩下乡下人才说凯尔特话。铺石的公路自此四通八达，繁荣城镇星罗棋布，罗马人还带来了基督教，其文化、习俗、生活用品也大量渗入，整个社会生活都罗马化了。直到五世纪初老家起火，他们才开始撤离。这是第一次被殖民地化。[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]
前门去狼，后门进虎。紧接着于五世纪中叶，原居住在西北欧的三个日耳曼野蛮部族——盎格鲁、撒克逊和朱特人横渡北海，所谓“条顿人的征服”，（严格地讲，可以说是四次引狼入室。因为罗马军团撤离以后，软弱的不列颠暴露于北方野蛮苏格兰人同皮克人的侵扰之下。据说首先是一位凯尔特部族领袖，主动邀请朱特人前来协办国防的；而朱特人见有隙可乘，后来才反客为主，并引发盎格鲁及撒克逊人也来大举入侵。）耗时一百五十年。秦始皇焚书坑儒？小菜一碟！日耳曼人把凯尔特整个一个民族的成年男子几乎打杀干净啦（第三次换血）！他们这些刽子手构成了今天英吉利民族的主体。自然，残留的妇孺免不了繁衍生息，于是一代又一代的混血种横空出世。
金庸历史小说非常有趣，其耐看不亚于斯蒂文森。然而，若按照小说中那些仁人志士伸张正义、替天行道的血性脾气，非得要报伊比利亚人同凯尔特人，还有中石器人的血海深仇，将那些屠夫的孽种——今日的英国人，杀个精光不可！
历三四百年七国并存（类春秋战国）的局面，迟到九世纪初，延伸至十一世纪初，日耳曼野蛮人终于从自身各个部族纷乱称雄之中名义上得到统一，演绎出英国统治世系的第一个朝代——撒克逊系。
就在撒克逊系统御国家的同时，九至十一世纪，来自北欧的维京海盗——其中主要是丹麦人，大规模入侵英国。他们除了在英格兰东北部建立“丹麦区”，进行直接赤裸裸的统治之外，以后又向南方扩张。到十一世纪上半叶，虽说不断受到盎格鲁撒克逊人的反抗，仍有三十年之久，整个英格兰都已置于了丹麦国王卡纽特统治之下 ——此三十年即英国朝廷的第二系，丹麦系。前后历三百年，语言、文化、司法、度量衡……无不受到深深的影响。屈辱的殖民地史，居然列入了国祚的正统。
十一世纪中叶卡纽特帝国瓦解以后，政权重归撒克逊人的手中，是谓西撒克逊系。但是新王爱德华之母却是个诺曼底人（所谓诺曼底人本来也不是诺曼底的人，而是原居住于北欧的诺曼人，于九世纪南徙至今法国西北部、由于他们到来才称做诺曼底的地方，安顿了下来。操法语，与法国同化了。当时受封于国王的公爵，其领地叫公国，伯爵的叫伯国。十世纪初建立了诺曼底公国，为法国封建诸侯中最强大的；名份上为法王属下，实际有相当的独立性），国王本人是个半撒克逊半诺曼底的杂种，他自幼在诺曼底长大，长期流亡于兹，三十八岁才回国。即位以后便大量起用诺曼底人，还跟其表弟诺曼底公爵结为联盟，以抗衡国内的贵族，并使法语成为社会上层主要的交流工具。可谓里通外国、引狼入室之先声。
一○六六年，那位表弟诺曼底公爵威廉，根据表哥生前有让他继位之愿望，率兵五千乘舰队入侵英国，打败并杀死了新王哈罗德。英国大主教于西敏寺为之加冕，凭着圣经将英格兰交付与之，不久他便携着一批归顺的大主教、王孙贵族，返回诺曼底去也。胜利的法国人几年以内不断焚毁村庄，杀戮平民，掠夺英国贵族的土地以犒赏亲属及随从，统治上层换成了诺曼人的天下，新贵族取代了盎格鲁撒克逊的老贵族，诺曼底——法兰西语和诺曼——法兰西法律成了英格兰宫廷、英格兰贵族的语言和法律。教会也由法国来的意大利籍大主教接管了。然而，正是这位建立了诺曼底王朝的外国殖民君主同他的世子（继位者）们，于司法制度、兴建教堂乃至形成上议院、文化……等等方面诸多建树，即是说从世俗（硬件）同灵魂（软件）两个方面，为社会公正奠定了基础，开创了不朽的盛世基业，很有一点汉武帝的气象哩！原先盎格鲁撒克逊时期每个人只有一个单名，现今这样名字后边尾以姓氏，也是模仿他们法国贵族来的，这便是第三次殖民地化。自此以后，再也没有外族跨海入侵、成立霸业的情事了。君主世袭制度也是从威廉肇始，故被英国人大捧特捧为“征服者威廉”，几乎被当成我们的尧舜禹汤（真是一群厚颜无耻的亡国奴）！[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]
说起尧舜禹汤，要提一下英国朝代递嬗的历史，那是迟到九世纪之初，自撒克逊国王埃格伯特开端的；较之我国西周共和，要晚上一千六百多年。一千二百年以来划为三个系、九代王朝，九朝当中还夹着一个共和政体。三系前边已经交代过了，第一代王朝便是这位威廉一世所建立。近一百年以后，安茹（法国地名）伯爵亨利二世（威廉一世的重外孙，又是一个外国人）跑到英国来，创建了安茹（又名金雀花）王朝——试设想一下，中国历史上若在北京建立一个约克（英地名）王朝或普瓦提埃（法地名）王朝，敝国上邦的文人们会不出来文饰一番，听由它赤裸裸洋名字刺激自己的自尊心吗？两朝共历三个半世纪之久，其中很长一段时间英国都是在法国国王的指挥棒下，让法国人或其后裔黄袍加身，君临英土。他们既是英国的一国之主，又在法国享有大片封地，作为法国藩镇，法王的附庸，其实心里只把英国当成一块殖民地，诺曼底才是他们的老巢，他们的根。一世以下有七位帝君，他们对英国只是遥领而已，大部分时间仍旧都呆在诺曼底的，其第六位在位十年，居留英国还不及一年哩。你看清兵入关，满人主宰天下以后，表现比他们还要好一些。尽管如此，英国人不去卧薪尝胆，不去做伯夷叔齐，偏还要把亨利二世这个法国拐子，也看作他们历史上最伟大的君王之一！直到十三世纪初法王将诺曼底收了回去，英国的君主这才慢慢地，开始一心一意作个名副其实的英国国王了。又过了将近两百年，朝廷重行回复到英国血统手中，开始了兰开斯特王朝。不过这一回殖民地亡国奴的滋味还要有得尝，又经历了大半个世纪，下一个约克王朝的第一任国王开始，才可以娶英国女子——而非法国女子，为王后；再又到建立都铎王朝的国王手上，英语才取代法语成为官方语言。到十八世纪的三十年代在法庭上才废止法语使用英语。
剩下来还有两次值得一提。第一回在一六八九年，中国的吴三桂刚刚于十年前闭上眼睛，英国大多数宗教徒出于强烈反对天主教国王掌政，不顾不久前荷兰海军驶入泰晤士河奇袭英皇家舰艇的国耻（1666年6月，荷兰海军迅雷不及掩耳冲入泰晤士河，炮毁英国舰只无数，王家船坞付诸一炬，尤为奇耻大辱者海军旗舰“皇家查尔斯号”竟被虏走。炮声隆隆，伦敦震撼，实实在在预演了一场珍珠港事变），请求国王的女儿玛丽同她的丈夫、荷兰统治者威廉（威廉不仅是国王的女婿，还是他的亲外甥）前来承继王位。于是女儿偕同女婿率军登陆英国，打得老豆跟老岳丈落荒而逃（当时玛丽的胞妹安，以及她的丹麦丈夫，倒向姐姐、姐夫一边，也背叛了老爹及泰山。后来安继威廉三世为女王，这个忤逆不孝的女人恶有善报，极富政声）。群臣请命：“玛丽女王，威廉摄政，如何？”“不干！”于是这位既有德国也有英国血统的荷兰杂种威廉三世，英国话都说不好的，堂而皇之地坐上了龙椅（玛丽为王后）。中国人要质问：伦理焉在，仁义何存？简直岂有此理！可是，沿袭至今虚君实相的民主政治体制——议会高于国王、平民院高于贵族院 ——正是此时确立，两党制格局也自兹形成；还有大败法王路易十四、成就英第一帝国等等功业。因此，英国人把这次不怎么流血的外戚入侵、大家都当亡国奴，十分自豪地称之为“光荣革命”，看得比中国人心目中的唐宗宋祖，还要高出许多头哩。
第二回是在二十五年以后，安女王仙逝无嗣，同样出于英国国教对天主教的排斥，遵照国会法案，举国迎接女王的表兄弟、德国番佬、汉诺威公爵乔治登基，称乔治一世。根本不会说英语，又在德国土生土长的他（其太子，后来继位的国王也一样），开始了史书上倒数第二个王朝，那又是一个以外国地名命名的王朝！此王朝繁演了一百多年，传到了维多利亚。哗，这位十八岁少女直到白发苍苍八十二岁老太太，金銮殿上龙椅一坐就是六十四年，比咱们康熙老皇帝还要长哇！可这个维多利亚不也是个杂种吗，原来她的母亲本是德意志一个小公国的寡妇，后来嫁到了英国王室。女王从小就在日耳曼人的教养下长大，母语说德语，英语一辈子也说得不地道。登基三年后又嫁给她所狂热崇拜的一位母系的表弟——不消说，那是个纯种日耳曼，狼子野心、非我族类无疑的喽！此后更加封亲王，倚之为左右手，批阅公文，干预朝政，（呜呼，大权旁落，一至于斯！）然而天哪，正是这一对野夫妇，文治武功，创造出英国历史上最辉煌的黄金时代！中国的中山路、中山堂、中山大、中山医科大……已经够多的啦，而以她维多利亚命名的，更遍及英、加、澳、亚、非诸多地域，还要多得多啊。英国人拿胜利、勇气、恒心、真理、母性、正义、科学与文艺、和平与进步……几乎所有想得到的颂辞，都奉献给了她，亲王也同样地世世代代倍受尊崇。你们瞧这个国民有多贱！其实，维多利亚的意义不仅限于英国。十八世纪，世界文明的重心在巴黎；十九世纪三十年代以后，即进入维多利亚时代，世界文明的重心到了伦敦。
以上这一类故事并不仅限于英国。我们知道古代日耳曼本是一个游牧民族，精壮男子去外边打仗，不断夺取新的土地，然后整个部落，男女老少，不断地易地迁居。他们极其重视荣誉，而这种荣誉是建立在比狠斗勇上边，认为掠夺、流血得来的财物，远比诚实劳动——流汗得来的光荣。所以打仗——掠夺，便成了生活的至高目的。为了抢劫不惜杀身成仁，舍生取义，血流成河，何等的悲壮！公元前一○二年，二十万条顿人于今法国马赛附近几乎全数被歼，死尸之多，居民不得不用白骨去砌葡萄园的藩篱。次年另一支日耳曼人在意大利北部牺牲更为惨烈，不单男人个个战死不屈，妇女们也成群先杀死自己的孩子，然后自刎。而欧洲人脉管中涌动着的，正是古罗马人（也是好战的种族）和古日耳曼人的血液！由此我们得知，如同汉民族这样死守着东亚一大片腹地，老子说“夫唯兵者不详之器”，墨子主张“非攻”，勤勤恳恳地从事农耕；三千年来各种民族成份无太大变动地延续了下来，虽足堪自豪，却并非世界人类史的唯一模式。
固然，王室皇族之间跨国互通嫁娶在欧洲的历史中据有特殊的地位，甚至曾经与民族国家之逐步形成同步进行，这一点本来同中国不大相同。即便是如此，从以上我们仍然可以得知，英国人是把宗教信仰、经济、政治的现实利益，以及实际政绩，看得高于抽象的民族感情的。所以像汉族这样，将对民族的忠贞当作超乎一切最高的价值标准，不惜掷头颅洒热血，赴汤蹈火；譬如从明末无数忠义之士壮烈殉国，清初到处反清复明，直闹到秋瑾，乃至孙中山还要靠黑社会排满起家，并不是人类文明史惟一的模式。
中国村只是地球上的一个角落，行善的人喜欢说“将心比心”，将心比心无疑是非常之好的；但是若认为邻村的善恶标准、价值取向，也应当同自己的一模一样，那便要谬误千里了。今天，跨在廿一世纪门槛上的我国青少年理应知己知彼，对这个多元的世界，对其他各个国家不同的历史，有更多的了解，具更博大的眼光，更宽阔的胸怀，以便当一个不至于丢人现眼的地球公民。爱国主义源于普遍的人性，民族沙文主义则要不得。
历史家皮名举有言“不学本国史不知道中国的伟大，不学西洋史不知道中国的落后”。信哉！
⑽ 关于“小说和电影”的比较,写一篇对比类的英文作文
ThewholemovieisalittleSimba'sgrowthhistory,thinkofwatchingthemoviemyself,reallylike,,,hairtemper,Ireallydonotshould,LionKingmovieFeedback.hohelpedme,sincerelysay---thankyou,,alotofworry.Iliketheinsideofthecharacters,likethisfunstoryfullofjoy,.,,althoughnotinthemovie,butitisnoteasy.,