法律电影观后感英文

A. 电影《肖申克的救赎》的英文观后感

Atonement,是救赎之义。at one,指的是由一人所带来的救赎，在基督教中指的是耶稣基督的犠牲，为人类带来的救恩。而在肖申克的电影之中，主角最后的成功逃狱之前，为狱友带来了各种恩惠，而他的逃狱也来自于多人的帮助，彼此为彼此在一群有罪之人聚集之地，成为了彼此的救赎。

事实上，主角Andy一开始是被陷害入狱的，所以救赎这个名词，同时也带有讽刺之义。无罪之人何来救赎。

B. 肖申克的救赎观后感英文

肖申克的救赎观后感英文：

I have always heard that "The Shawshank Redemption" is a very good film, when I have watched it; I thought the film is very successful.

In Shawshank prison, there was a man called Andy. He was innocent .So he was always looking for opportunities to jail. He and Reed were good friends. One day, he asked Reed to give him a small hammer. In the night, he began to burrow in the wall, trying to escape from the prison.

After nineteen years, he finally escaped.Later, Reed was released from the prison, and they lived a life of freedom.

In the film, Andy was free finally in 19 years because of maintaining a persistent heart. Andy told us what the hope of life was. As what was said in the film: Everyone has their own God, if you have to give up yourself, who will save you!

This film gave me a lot of touch and enlightenment, in real life, everyone will encounter many setbacks, at this time, what should we do? We need to be looking for hope, overcome difficulties and continue to move forward. In conclusion: As long as there is hope, we should expand the bright wings, flying in the vast sky.

译文

当我看过《肖申克的救赎》时，我总是听说它是一部非常好的电影；我认为这部电影很成功。

肖申克监狱里有一个叫安迪的人，他是无辜的，他一直在寻找出狱的机会。他和里德是好朋友。一天，他让里德给他一把小锤子。到了晚上，他开始在墙上挖洞，试图逃离监狱。

十九年后，他终于逃脱了。后来，里德从监狱获释，他们过着自由的生活。

在影片中，安迪在19年后终于自由了，因为他保持了一颗坚毅的心。安迪告诉我们生命的希望是什么。正如电影中所说：每个人都有自己的上帝，如果你不得不放弃自己，谁会拯救你！

这部电影给了我很多感触和启示，在现实生活中，每个人都会遇到很多挫折，在这个时候，我们该怎么办？我们需要寻找希望，克服困难，继续前进。总结：只要有希望，我们就应该展开明亮的翅膀，在浩瀚的天空中飞翔。

C. 电影守法公民的观后感

关于电影守法公民的观后感

用反正义的手段向司法制度挑战——评电影《守法公民》

克莱德·谢尔顿是居住在费城某小镇的一名研发人员，他有着美丽的妻子和可爱的女儿，生活幸福美满。但这一切都被突如其来的灾难所摧毁。某晚，两个暴徒闯入他的家中，妻子和女儿都受到残害。然而虽然证据确凿，但由于司法程序的迂腐和尼克·瑞斯（杰米·福克斯 Jamie Foxx 饰）助理执行官的堕落，最终让首犯克拉伦斯·多比（克里斯蒂安·斯多特 Christian Stolte 饰）因证据不足只得到10年徒刑。

本以为一切归于沉寂，但10年后当年未了的风波再起。怀着巨大仇恨的克莱德开始筹划展开报复，先是干掉了当年的从犯阿米，接着他很快找到了邪恶无耻的多比，并对其进行残酷的折磨与虐杀。克莱德的仇恨得到巨大的宣泄，但是他的复仇还未就此停止。他所针对的不只是那两个暴徒，而是整个腐朽堕落的司法系统……

当今世界上主要有欧美法系和大陆法系，这两大法系都存在漏洞，只是美国的欧美法系对于人权的保障多一些，有点宁可放过一千，不可错杀一个的味道，在这样的司法体制下，重证据，重程序的实质要多于对于事实本身的追求，美国的法律认为程序的非正义性一定会导致实质的非正义性，所以很多案件发生之后，法官、律师、陪审团都在调查程序、证人证词、律师辩论上打转转，以求得还原案情本身的实际。

但是，人是有思维的动物，法律体系是死的，是有漏洞的，无论任何完备的法系，都能找到存在的漏洞可供人们钻。

就守法公民这部电影而言，男主人公谢尔顿在妻子、女儿被虐杀之后希望得到来自法律的'保护还死者一个公平和正义。可是检察官尼克带来的结果却是要被害人与杀人犯达成和解以其把杀人犯送进监狱坐10年牢。在没有办法的情况下，其实我觉得也是男主角迫于检察官的压力不得不做出了违心的选择，同意与杀人犯达成协议。

但是，仇恨不会就此消除。10年后，两名杀人犯都死于残忍的虐杀，本来谢尔顿可以利用美国司法体系的漏洞逃脱法律的制裁，但是他没有，他选择了战斗，与美国的司法体系抗衡。

他在监牢中杀死牢友，把自己转入禁闭室，再从禁闭室逃出来趁机远程杀害了审理案件的法官、费城司法部的大部分官员。最后在准备炸毁市政府大楼时，被检察官尼克提前识破诡计，而最终难逃一死，导演在表现谢尔顿死的一段时，用了很漫画的手法，把谢尔顿描绘成一个像耶稣一样的神。大火在周遭燃烧，但是，没有一点痛苦。

我倒是很希望结局是市政府大楼被炸，那样就会表现得更加彻底的摧毁美国的司法制度。

可能是导演和编剧考虑到社会影响，总不希望人们都凭借反正义的暴力来维护自己的公平正义吧，所以，导演选择了让检察官胜出，这是我看这部电影的最大的遗憾。

amu:

除了宗教（当然还有邪教）和道德，世界上没有多少法律制度主张私权伸张通过“以血还血，以牙还牙”的方式，但是所谓先进的制度设计，考虑的前提永远是人的不确定性甚至是政府的伪善性，进而在程序上尽可能地保障实体正义的取得要排除掉或者减少恶性因素，说大点：自由是法律的最终目的，但法律作为手段更要保证自由要在不侵害他人合法自由以及社会普遍的自由，才能实现。在法学理论中，注意我强调的是法学领域，自由与正义的价值位阶也是，自由是最高位阶，正义次之。所以，法律的制度设计要追求一种最佳状态，就是在保护人的合法自由的前提下最大限度地实现正义。

反观，我们如今人人张口闭口就是正义，正义，正义。其实，每个人心中的正义都源自于自己对于自由的渴望与追求。所以，在法律层面，不可能完全地遵从所谓的实质正义，法律是有局限性的，当然这里面也存在一个良法恶法的因素。那就是古往今来争论不惜的一个论证：恶法是不是法，需不需要遵守？？？

但是，正如本片中所反映的，法本身只要是规范科学合理，本身没有公正不公正，只是法的执行上存在人与政府的不确定性，当法所追求的正义与道德、人性甚至青春生命等发生了冲突时，我们如何来追求一种补救的正义呢？？单纯依靠法律自然是不能的？？？他杀了你，你生命灭失，无法复仇，然后你的儿子基于情感与道德再杀了他，然后他生命灭失，他的儿子在如此轮回地杀你的儿子，周而复始，生命轮回，这是正义吗？至少不是法所追求的正义，更不是法所认为能够实现的自由。

所以，其实这就是一个人自己选择的自由问题。人可以为善，也可以为恶，只要他愿意接受相应的权责。立法、执法、司法人员违法导致了不正义，但要承担责任，法律上没有承担的话，或许就有道德、宗教等其他层面的责任。一个社会、一个国家，如果违法者无责任，也无道德上的归责，更无其他责任的话，那么崩塌的可不只是一栋政府大楼。

F:

暴力不等于非正义，暴力更不等于反正义。

立论欠妥当。

法国大革命造就了令人羡慕的法国。

文明的理念正是通过暴力得以延伸，才造就了令人羡慕的欧美。

大和正是通过（民主文明的）暴力矫正，才进化为今日之令人敬佩的民族。

然而，

独裁、寡头、法西斯主义、军国主义、共产主义、现代封建主义等等，也是必须通过暴力，才得以猖狂贻害和残喘的……

故此，简单批评、甚至定性暴力本身，是很粗浅的认识。

如果有能力理解美国宪法第二修正案，你就会明白用武器（第二修正案时代只有“枪z”，我在此放宽为“武器”）对抗暴政，其实是美国宪法赋予美国人民的基本权利。

所以，暴力及其工具本身并无先天过错，对错全在人的主观和判断。（同样是对当权者的某种政策不满，请自行对比一下本片主人公的判断和挪威那厮的判断）

所以，文明国家才想尽办法提高人民素质；

所以，垃圾政权和神奇的国度才想尽办法让老百姓变得更蠢更听话。

附一段摘录：

美国的《独立宣言》宣告：人人生而平等，经过被政府管理的人们认可并授予的政府权力才是正当的政府权力，人们为了保障人们的生命权、财产权和追求幸福的权利才建立政府，当政府违背这些目的时，人民有权利也有义务变更或废除政府，并根据人民的需要建立新的政府。

那么，人民如何使用权利废除违背人民意愿的政府？当时宪法起草人杰佛逊认为，只有百姓有持枪权才能将这种权利付诸实践。美国宪法规定，任何条文可以根据将来的情况加以修改，但百姓自由持枪这一条绝对不能改，它被写在了美国宪法第二条修正案当中：“人民持有和携带武器的权利不得侵犯。”

D. 求一篇《拯救大兵瑞恩》电影的观后感，用英文.800字左右，真心谢谢啦，

第一篇：《拯救大兵瑞恩》

Saving Private Ryan
Saving Private Ryan is a film which was directed by Steven Spielberg. The two main charactrs are Captain John Miller,played by Tom Hanks, and private James Ryan,played by Matt Damon.
James Ryan is the fourth brother to be involed in the Second World War.His three brothers has already been killed, two of them in the D-Day landing in Normandy, the other in a battle in another part of the world.Their heart-broken mother receives the news about all her dead sons on the same day.The US army decides to send a groups of men into the French countryside to try to find the fourth brother.Captain Miller, a hero and the surviror of the Omaha Beach battle, is choosen to lead the rescue team of eight men.
The film opens with a 30-minute sequence of the invasion of Normandy, probably the most violent images of war ever shown in a film.We see the full horror of the war,and the chaos and the senseless waste of life.
Saving Private Ryan is an unforgettable anti-war film,and also a story of couerage and sacrifice.Spielberg has made a lot of good films, but he has never made one with such a strong message.And the message is simple---We want peace,we don't want war.

E. 5篇100字左右的英文电影的观后感，要用英语啊

"The Count of Monte Cristo" Movie Review （基茄销督山颤虚游誉蚂伯爵－－电影观后感） Imprisoned for a crime he didn't commit, torn away from his family and his fiancée, Edmund spends 15 years locked away in a damp prison, most of which is spent learning fighting and survival skills from a wizened old criminal, played with gentle humor by Richard Harris. Meanwhile, Fernand and Mercedes marry (that always happens in romance novels) despite the fact that she never got over her love of Edmund. The plot thickens with Edmund's escape from prison and his secret reemergence as the dashing, and wealthy, Count of Monte Cristo. The fight scenes are amazingly fluid, swordplay seeming to come naturally to both Guy Pearce and Jim Caviezel. The film also features a humorous performance from the talented Luis Guzman as a man devoted to the Count/Edmund. While some of the lines used in both the prison scenes and the "buddy" scenes between Guzman and Caviezel are a bit unbelievable (there occasionally seems to be a tad too much of the new millennium in the way they speak), most of the scenes are true to the times and the scenery and sets are authentically breathtaking.

F. 求电影《Double Jeopardy》即《致命追缉令》 英文感想 英文简介 观后感什么的 越详细越好，谢谢各位 谢谢

Double jeopardy is a proceral defense that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same, or similar charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction. At common law a defendant may plead autrefois acquit or autrefois convict (a peremptory plea), meaning the defendant has been acquitted or convicted of the same offense.
If this issue is raised, evidence will be placed before the court, which will normally rule as a preliminary matter whether the plea is substantiated, and if it so finds, the projected trial will be prevented from proceeding. In many countries the guarantee against being "twice put in jeopardy" is a constitutional right; these include Canada, India, Mexico, and the United States. In other countries, the protection is afforded by statute law.

it very good , i like it very much, thank u for reading.

G. 电影观后感用英文怎么说

电影观后感用英文怎么说？这个问题似乎暗示着一种对电影的反思和评价需要通过英文表达。在英文中，我们可以使用“movie review”或者“film review”来描述这种形式。电影观后感是一种常见的文化产品，它通常包括对电影的描述、评价以及个人感受。通过撰写电影观后感，人们可以分享自己的观影体验，同时也可以帮助其他观众更好地了解电影的内容和风格。

一篇好的电影观后感通常会包含几个部分。首先，简要介绍电影的基本信息，例如导演、主演、上映时间等。接着，可以详细描述电影的情节、角色发展以及导演的风格。然后，基于个人的感受，对电影进行评价，可以是正面的，也可以是负面的。此外，还可以提出一些个人的观点，例如对电影主题的理解或者对某些情节的看法。最后，可以总结自己的感受，给出整体评价。这种结构有助于读者更好地理解作者的观点，同时也让观后感更加条理清晰。

值得注意的是，电影观后感的写作不仅仅是描述电影，更重要的是通过个人的感受和评价来传达自己的见解。因此，在撰写时，应该尽量保持客观公正，同时也要敢于表达自己的真实感受。这样，不仅可以让读者更好地理解电影，也可以促进不同观点之间的交流和讨论。

H. 求一篇英文电影的观后感

电影《肖申克的救赎》The ShawShank Redemption 观后感。
Hello, everyone, my topic today is “The ShawShank Redemption”. Prison as a special place for prisoners is part of the society. It’s special because of its depriving the freedom of the prisoners. The prisoners in that situation are more sensitive to freedom than people in other situations. When they lost it, they found that it was so necessary to them that they looked forward to regaining it. By contrast, the people lived in the political society were interested in courting the fame and gain. They lost most of their inherent character. They put their soul into the fence of their own. They gave up the freedom of thinking. They forgot their original dream. The demands of the spirit were materialized to a position or some numbers.

A prisoner spent almost all the life in the prison. When he got the parole, which was applied for many years but without reply, he didn’t feel happy, but sad. He wanted to go to the prison again. He wanted to live in the place he knew. In the prison, he was a key who had knowledge and position. But when he went out of the prison, he found he was only an old man without anything. He couldn’t finish his work quickly because his hands had suffered the arthritis. Unfortunately, he even had no power to struggle. As a result, He chose to suicide because it was the only thing he could do by himself.

Red was a superman in the prison. He could find things that weren’t in the prison at all. But when he went out of the prison, he could do nothing. He lived in the fear and felt so lonely. He loved freedom but he couldn’t realize his value. In this film, Red said, “Hope is a dangerous thing. Drive a man insane. Nothing will take place here. You’d better get used to the idea. These walls here are kinds of funny. At the beginning, you hate them, then you will get used to them. As time passes, you will depend on them. That's institutionalizing.”

In this film, Andy as the symbol of the hope lived in the prison for 20 years. He remained his dream all the time. On one hand, he looked forward to getting freedom. On the other hand, he believed that he was innocent of the murder. The real reason was his profound thought about hope. In his opinion, hope is a good thing, maybe the best thing, and no good things ever die. It makes a strong man save himself, and a great man save another one. According to this idea, the life in prison for 20 years did not made Andy give up the hope, but made him comprehend the meaning of the life. In fact, hope is a mood without ambition but it really exists.

The sky, the sea and the beach compose a romantic picture. When Andy and Red, two weather-beaten friends, saw each other again in the island, all hardship of 20 years made Andy tougher and their friendship get harder as the same.

最好你自己也去看看，根据你的感受修改下会表现更好！这实在是一部很Man的电影，拘于困境，受尽委屈却不屈不挠，对自我的拯救！

I. 急求电影《七宗罪》英文观后感一篇~~~英文简单一些，本人英语水平不是很高谢谢!!

Seven," a dark, grisly, horrifying and intelligent thriller, may be too disturbing for many people, I imagine, although if you can bear to watch, it you will see filmmaking of a high order. It tells the story of two detectives - one ready to retire, the other at the start of his career - and their attempts to capture a perverted serial killer who is using the Seven Deadly Sins as his scenario.

As the movie opens, we meet Somerset (Morgan Freeman), a meticulous veteran cop who lives a lonely bachelor's life in what looks like a furnished room. Then he meets Mills (Brad Pitt), an impulsive young cop who actually asked to be transferred into Somerset's district. The two men investigate a particularly gruesome murder, in which a fat man was tied hand and feet and forced to eat himself to death.

His crime was the crime of Gluttony. Soon Somerset and Mills are investigating equally inventive murders involving Greed, Sloth, Lust and the other deadly sins. In each case, the murder method is appropriate, and disgusting (one victim is forced to cut off a pound of his own flesh; another is tied to a bed for a year; a third, too proud of her beauty, is disfigured and then offered the choice of a call for help or sleeping pills). Somerset concludes that the killer, "John Doe," is using his crimes to preach a sermon.

The look of "Seven" is crucial to its effect. This is a very dark film, the gloom often penetrated only by the flashlights of the detectives. Even when all the lights are turned on in the apartments of the victims, they cast only wan, hopeless pools of light.

Although the time of the story is the present, the set design suggests the 1940s; Gary Wissner, the art director, goes for dark blacks and browns, deep shadows, lights of deep yellow, and a lot of dark wood furniture. It rains almost all the time.

In this jungle of gloom, Somerset and Mills tread with growing alarm. Somerset intuits that the killer is using books as the inspiration for his crimes, and studies Dante, Milton and Chaucer for hints. Mills settles for the Cliff Notes versions. A break in the case comes with Somerset's sudden hunch that the killer might have a library card. But the corpses pile up, in cold fleshy detail, as disturbingly graphic as I've seen in a commercial film. The only glimmers of life and hope come from Tracy (Gwyneth Paltrow), Mills' wife.

A movie like this is all style. The material by itself could have been handled in many ways, but the director, David Fincher ("Alien 3"), goes for evocative atmosphere, and the writer, Andrew Kevin Walker, writes dialogue that for Morgan Freeman, in particular, is wise, informed and poetic. ("Anyone who spends a significant amount of time with me," he says, "finds me disagreeable.") Eventually, it becomes clear that the killer's sermon is being preached directly to the two policemen, and that in order to understand it, they may have to risk their lives and souls.

"Seven" is unique in one detail of its construction; it brings the killer onscreen with half an hour to go, and gives him a speaking role. Instead of being simply the quarry in a chase, he is revealed as a twisted but articulate antagonist, who has devised a horrible plan for concluding his sermon. (The actor playing the killer is not identified by name in the ads or opening credits, and so I will leave his identity as another of his surprises.) "Seven" is well-made in its details, and uncompromising in the way it presents the disturbing details of the crimes. It is certainly not for the young or the sensitive. Good as it is, it misses greatness by not quite finding the right way to end. All of the pieces are in place, all of the characters are in position, and then - I think the way the story ends is too easy. Satisfying, perhaps. But not worthy of what has gone before.