㈠ 电影《roots》的相关介绍
电影《roots》该剧改编自美国黑人作家阿历克斯-哈利的同名小说，该书是1976年在美国最大的畅销书。而这部连续剧也很完美的反应出了小说的情景与内涵。通过空间的变化，以及跨越1个世纪的时间鸿沟，忠实地再现了一个黑人家庭六代人，被奴隶贩子从非洲漂洋过海掳到美洲进行一次次贩卖的曲折屈辱的经历。以一个具体事例，以小见大地反映出美国两千五百万黑人的苦难历史，剖析了奴隶制的野蛮残暴。
㈡ no roots 无损百度云
你好，我是兔兔秃90，用网络网盘分享给你，点开就可以保存，链接永久有效^_^链接:https://pan..com/s/1ZN3rRCFXQqhWxU4v0zcxHA
㈢ 求《小王子》英文读后感（the little prince)700字左右
1
The Little Prince, the iconic 1943 classic written by the French aviator and writer, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, tells a story happened in the Desert of Sahara, about a stranded pilot who befriended a young golden-haired prince, fallen from the skies and constantly questioning the incongruities of human life.
The protagonist in this book, an extraordinary and mysterious little prince, lived on a small planet known as Asteroid B-612, which was comprised of three volcanoes, two active and the other extinct, and a rose with astonishing beauty. The flower was rarely found and charming beyond measure, but she was also vain and self-centred, which made the little prince leave his planet because of his inability to confront her. During his journey, the little prince visited several planets, and had conversations with their inhabitants, including a king, a conceited man, a tippler, a businessman, a lamplighter and a geographer, from whom he found, in bewilderment, how unreasonable and meaningless the world of grown-ups is. Finally, he arrived at the earth, where he was thunderstruck by a heart-breaking fact that his flower was not the only one of her kind in the universe. At that moment appeared a fox, asking the little prince to “tame” him; then he did so. Before the little prince’s departure, the fox convinced him of the uniqueness of the rose to him and the essence of love and responsibility for one another. At the end of the story, on the one-year anniversary of the little prince’s descent to the earth, the pilot walked sadly with his friend to the place where he landed. He saw a yellow poisonous snake bit the little prince, who fell noiselessly to the sand and was presumed to have returned to his planet because no body was found the next day.
Some people believe that The Little Prince is a fairy-tale, for the sentences in it are simple and natural, flow with a poetic grace, which make the whole story easy to read and understand, while others consider it as a fable because of its abundant symbols and metaphors in the ostensibly simple plot. I’d like to venture my opinion that there’s no need to put the book into any certain category because it is of no consequence to do so. Actually, the expression “matters of consequence” has some satirical meaning in this novel, just as what Saint-Exupéry said in the book:
“If you were to say to the grown-ups: ‘I saw a beautiful house made of rose brick, with geraniums in the windows and doves on the roof,’ they would not be able to get any idea of that house at all. You would have to say to them: ‘I saw a house that cost $20,000.’ Then they would exclaim: ‘Oh, what a pretty house that is!’”
Grown-ups are always like that. No wonder Saint-Exupéry always wanted to be a child. In the opening of this well-illustrated book, he scoffed at alts’ lack of imagination by showing the readers two interesting pictures: the drawings of a boa constrictor eating an elephant from the outside, regarded as a hat by the alts, and the inside. As a concession to grown-ups who only care about ll and pragmatic matters, and view the world in a quantitative way, the narrator gave up painting, and lived a lonely life as a result of his atypical outlook on life. By saying so, I don’t mean that people should behave childishly on purpose to demonstrate their purity and innocence. Even Saint-Exupéry himself had done big things as all grown-ups do: flew everything from cartography missions to commercial airlines, rescued doomed pilots in the desert, pioneered the mail route from France to South America – the things that bring money, fame and prestige, and all basic necessities of life. I also noticed that Saint-Exupéry mentioned several times in his story that drawing was very difficult for him when grown up because he abandoned it early at the age of six. But I am sure that somewhere, deep inside, he retained a pure and innocent heart. As you can see, he had also done many little things that all little ones do: sketched pictures, comprehended simple things like love and sorrow, like the subtle truths told by the fox to the little prince. Therefore, we can guess that his decision to illustrate his story also lead to his return to the lost innocence as a child.
In my view, Saint-Exupéry is a man with a sensible mind as well as a childlike heart, and maybe that’s why The Little Prince has become perhaps the most widely read book after Bible. Although it was written for children, it strikes a chord with alts for its profoundly philosophical undertones.
Sometimes, I would even have the illusion that Saint-Exupéry was always a child. In his heart, and in his readers’ souls, he was exactly the little prince himself, who refused to grow up and would never grow up. In the year 1944, on a flight mission ring World War II, the eccentric aviator flew his plane from Corsica and disappeared forever, which became one of the most mysterious legends in the history of French literature.
In the following 50 years, all the readers of The Little Prince hold the conviction that Saint-Exupéry has returned to his own star. And in the evening, when you look up into the sky, you’ll see five hundred million little laughing bells, on one of which the little prince shall be living, and it is because of him that all the stars become meaningful.
2
One of the best spiritual books ever written for me is The Little Prince by Antoint de Saint-Exupery. Although is usually sold as book for children, it is nevertheless book for alts, because more then children, alts are they who need to be reminded on simple truths about real values in human life.
This enchanting novel came into my life on my 20th birthday as a present from one special person. In the following years I discovered that guy who gave me that book was not so special at all, but The Little Prince stayed with me as my faithful and sparkling companion in the many crucial moments of my life.
Antoint de Saint Exupery, world famous writer and pilot, wrote it to his and our inner child, this little sparkle of joy, love and innocence everyone of us carry in the hearts. His words touch deeply, they lead to the core of reader`s inner being and open hearts of the reader for the accepting the deeper meaning of human existence in universe.
The Little Prince is powerful story, written from pure essence of love, simple and unbelievable strong . It also faces us with our many human ego-trips which do not allow us to experience freedom and joy of life and make us, alts so rigid and strange in innocent eyes of children.
While travelling with the little prince through the universe and accompanying him on the Earth reader will experience many moments of inner enlightenment, moments of joy and deep sadness. Yes, this adventurous novel is deeply emotional from the very beginning to the end - it surrounds one with brilliant sparkles of deep love and innocence, it makes one laugh and cry together with the little prince, it teaches one responsibility, it gently heals the soul, it reminds one on truth about immortality, it shows to all of us the ways how we can create much better world then we now live in and explains one why is this worthwhile.
㈣ 急求电影《On Golden Pond>英文观后感,六百字左右.
"On Golden Pond" was the surprise hit of 1981, the second highest grossing film of that year after "Raiders of the Lost Ark". Yet it is not the sort of film for which one would normally predict great box-office success. It is about as different a film from "Raiders" as one can imagine. Whereas Spielberg's blockbuster is a testosterone-fuelled action-adventure, "On Golden Pond" is a quiet, reflective drama about an elderly couple spending the summer by a lake.
The film was adapted by Ernest Thompson from his play of the same name. (Remarkably, given his theme of old age, Thompson was still in his twenties when he wrote it). Although attempts are made to open the action up by including scenes shot outdoors (there is some very attractive photography of the New England scenery), it clearly betrays its origin as a stage play with its limited number of characters and preponderance of dialogue over physical action.
The central characters are Norman (aged eighty) and Ethel (aged in her late sixties) Thayer, who spend every summer at their second home on Golden Pond, a lake in New Hampshire. (The word "pond" in American usage can clearly mean a far larger body of water than it does in Britain). The plot focuses on the relationship between Norman and Ethel and their daughter Chelsea, who pays them a visit together with her fiancé Bill and his twelve-year-old son Billy. (Were women of Jane Fonda's generation ever named "Chelsea"? I though that only began to be used as a girl's name in the sixties).
Jane Fonda purchased the rights to the play as a vehicle for her father Henry, doubtless because she saw in the turbulent relationship between Norman and Chelsea Thayer a reflection of the equally difficult real-life relationship between the Fondas. Norman is in many ways the most important character in the film. It is clear that he has always been a difficult man to get on with, and age does not seem to have mellowed the cantankerous old man at all. He bickers constantly with his long-suffering and more placid wife Ethel, although it is clear that despite their verbal battles they have a deep affection for one another. "You old poop!" might not normally be regarded as a term of endearment; as used by Ethel about her husband it becomes one.
The father-daughter relationship between Norman and Chelsea is clearly more problematic, although the roots of their estrangement are never made clear. Possibly Norman resents his daughter for not being the son he longed for but never had, and he make his dislike of her new fiancé all too obvious. What serves to bring father and daughter back together is the special bond which grows up between Norman and young Billy, whom he and Ethel look after while Chelsea and Bill are away on vacation in Europe. Norman might not have a son, but Billy, although not related to him by blood, is the grandson he always wanted so they can go on fishing trips together. (Chelsea's first marriage, which ended in divorce, was childless).
The film stars not only Henry Fonda as Norman but also another great cinema legend, Katharine Hepburn, as Ethel, and both won well-deserved Oscars for their performances. Fonda's award seems to have come as something of a surprise; in the course of his long career he had received only one previous acting nomination, for "The Grapes of Wrath" in 1940, and the year before making "On Golden Pond" had been given an "Honorary Award for Lifetime Achievement". (Such awards are often interpreted as meaning "we're sorry that you've never had a real Oscar and are never likely to get one, so please accept this consolation prize with our apologies"). This was to be Fonda's last film; he was to die a few months after receiving his award. In Hepburn's case this was her fourth "Best Actress" award, setting a record which still stands. Jane Fonda was nominated for "Best Supporting Actress" but missed out, possibly because she already had two Oscars on her mantelpiece and the Academy thought it would only be fair to spread the honours more evenly.
"On Golden Pond" can, at times, be rather sugary, but for the most part it is lifted above mere sentimentality by the strength of the acting. During the seventies the cinema had become increasingly youth-obsessed, a trend which was to continue throughout the eighties (and, indeed, is still continuing today). It therefore comes as a refreshing surprise to come across a film from this period which stars in its leading roles two actors in their seventies. Like "Ordinary People", which won "Best Picture" the previous year, this film is a drama which explores, in a sensitive and sympathetic manner, the difficulties faced by ordinary human beings doing their best to cope with life.
㈤ 精灵旅社的观后感(英文版)
Hotel Transylvania and we spend Halloween, let us look at the hotel Transylvania vampires, zombies have what new story to bring you. More hotel Transylvania feedback as in Jinghan net of the university entrance exam, Jinghan net of the university entrance exam have you need all feedback the latest TV drama and movie feedback, need high school feedback you come Jinghan entrance bar!
Halloween is coming soon, this schele has become a heavy military battle. Don't to conventional released the horror movie, this year's Halloween has released a warm, romantic, funny, imagination ultra rich, Meng to not 3D animated cartoon "Hotel Transylvania". Yesterday, the film in Guangzhou held the preview will be applauded by the media, and the vampire Count Dracula, the subversion of the image of terror, with a super Dad image of love, let the audience of both joy and moved. A reporter saw the film last, Dracula in order to let her daughter Mavis and his own "love at first sight" of the boys, at the end of the incarnation of bats in the hot sun, the boy chased back, almost life hanging line, become the audience the most love tears.
It is reported that 3D "Hotel Transylvania" in North America release win in the first week of the $424.2 million at the box office, far beyond the "the Smurfs" was a box office record, and won the 2013 the 70th annual Golden Globe Awards Film Best Animated Film Nominated. The animated image of the whole "Hotel Transylvania" very innovative, movie full of whimsy, the audience often film in fanciful imagination pleasantly surprised. Parents can take the kids to see the 3D movie.
精灵旅社与我们一起度过万圣节，让我们看看精灵旅社里的吸血鬼，僵尸有什么新的故事要带给大家吧。更多精灵旅社观后感尽在京翰高考网，京翰高考网有大家需要的所有最新电视剧观后感以及电影的观后感，需要高中观后感的你快来京翰高考网吧！
万圣节即将到来，这个档期也成为兵家厮杀的重地。有别于常规上映的惊悚电影，今年的万圣节有一部温馨、浪漫、逗趣、想象力超丰富、萌到不行的3D动画片《精灵旅社》上映。昨日，该片在广州举办了试映会，受到了媒体的一致好评，而其中的吸血鬼德古拉伯爵，这次颠覆了恐怖的形象，以一个超有爱的老爸形象，让观众既欢乐又感动。有记者更表示看到该片最后，德古拉为了让女儿梅维斯能和自己“一见钟情”的男孩在一起，不惜化身蝙蝠在烈日下追飞机，把男孩追回来，差点命悬一线，成为全场最有爱的泪点。
据悉，3D《精灵旅社》在北美上映首周拿下了4242万美元票房，远远超越了《蓝精灵》创下的票房纪录，并荣获了2013年第70届金球奖电影类最佳动画片提名。整部《精灵旅社》的动画形象非常创新，电影中充满各种奇思妙想，观众常常为电影中天马行空的想象力感到惊喜。有空的家长可以带这小孩子去看看这部3D电影。
㈥ 《野性的呼唤》的读后感
中文：
野性的呼唤是一本很好的书，不像童话那样可爱生动活泼，有时候甚至是让人感到恐怖，其实这不是它的缺点，而是它的优点。班上大部分同学都喜欢恐怖的故事，我也不例外，大家应该看题目都有点起鸡皮疙瘩了吧？！那就让我来简单说一下吧：巴克（注意：巴克就是主人公，它是一只狗）在冰天雪地里面拉雪橇，不到一个月就瘦了足足15斤，只好卖掉巴克买其它的狗。和：南极的温度是零下50摄氏度左右，每天要拉12个小时的雪橇。从这两个地方就足以看出有点恐怖了，不用像后面就比前面还有让人胆战心惊了！
每人心中都有一分狂野，正如那条银色的狗，或者说是狼。
人的内心是很隐秘的，我们无法了解他，许多人甚至不知道他的存在。等到我们经历了很多，许多沧海变做桑田，自己的心也累了，甚至连跳动的力量也没有了，猛然做梦时发现了自己祖先也与狼一般于禁林中召唤，我们会义无返顾的回到本就属于也是我们本影在的地方吗？
野性不光在呼唤我们的心，甚至灵魂也为他屈服。忽的想起了那句“随风奔跑自由是方向”原始的自有他的美丽。这个复杂的世界正是由自然用最简单的方法造就的。这只是个时间问题，时间可以改变坚固的山石，清明的流水，让世界毁灭又让它重生。但他永远不能磨灭生命的骨髓——野性。因为他是不可改变的。没有他则生命也无从谈起，他有无穷的哲理。唤起了野性不是重生就是涅盘。也正是他的矛盾让人们渴望野性之火的燃烧又惧怕他焚毁自己。
野性的呼唤，来隐秘的深处。
英文：
My Call of the Wild
------ Enlightenment of The Call of the Wild
" He sings a song of the younger world, which is the song of the pack." (Chapter VII The Sounding of the Wild) When the last sentence vanished from my eyes, I can still perceive an echo of a song - a wild song, which knocks up my dizzy mind that always cheerfully sink into the so-called civilized world without questioning. Wild, is no longer a symbol of the law of jungle but a headspring where streams out love, passion, bravery, loyalty, friendship, venture, competition and tolerance all these virtues can easily be found in the Call of the Wild.
Jack London (1876-1916) is a worldwide renowned novelist. His stories successfully reflect the contradictory views of man’s nature and destiny in and against the wild, and his "fight to survive" notion has gained him and his works timeless popularity, particularly, the Call of the Wild
It tells a story of a gigantic dog, named Buck, who is stolen from a rich and comfortable home and forced to learn to survive as an Alaskan sled dog. Buck, at first, is too savage for the company of man until he coincidently encounters his beloved master-kindhearted John Thornton. Finally, John’s incidental death breaks Buck’s last tie to the man and drives him into his long-desired wild with his pack. In the story, Buck and John simply adopt themselves to answer the call of the wild. When it comes to Buck’s mind that one day he will eventually leave John- his master, all he wants to do is just to help him finish the gold-rush-trip. He " from then on, night and day, never put a halt, in desperation, he burst into long stretch of flight, did not to stay him (John)…" (Chapter VII The Sounding of The Wild) Buck wished to remember John’s image forever, he "for two days and nights never left camp, never let Thornton out of his sight. He followed him about at his work, watched him while saw him into blankets at night and out of them in the morning…" (Chapter VII) When I read these words I just could not hold my tears bursting. Can a real man devote himself to loyalty and friendship in such a way? On the other hand, John Thornton is not only a dog-lover but also a brave and venturous man. He is so straightforward and simple that makes him an accommodating man. Once he firmly roots a goal into his heart, it seems that nothing could prevent him from accomplishing it except death. I do not know whether the persistence is the most vital element to make a man successful, but what I know is that you are not far away from success once you occupy it.
It is Jack London who plunges me into the animated wild from the hustle-and-bustle and from desperate city. There, I merely cannot deny the attraction of Buck’s bark, which enlightens me to pursue another lost half of the nature in mankind, and to dig out a true meaning of life. Dare we imagine that London intentionally employs Buck to set us a model with perfect characters (count barbarity out)? The answer is affirmed. We, as animals, are from the wild but shedding off more and more wild signs, which demonstrate us as the "uncivilized". However, who can fully guarantee that we have not overlooked some essential wild-endowed virtues? Especially, nowadays, it seems more crucial for us to stop looking at the post-instrialized world and to ponder for a while. When cheats, betrayals, lies, lusts and crimes stuff a materialized society, whether London uses this novel to help himself escape the reality or warn the earthy people, to us, modern man, is all the same. It appears horrible that in modern society many people are enthusiastically talking about how to build up "special relations" to the authority, deceiving and lying to each other. To them life is a mask-wearing process rather than a hard work. Every time, you browse WebPages, scandals in politics, business, the entertainment circle and even on campus crowd into your eyes. Oh, what is the essence of human beings? What is the civilization to us? Do we need to look back at where we came from? Is it good or bad for us to speak out what we think and to do what the consciences demand us to? Are we wasting talents given by the mighty nature? Be an honest, straightforward, warmhearted, emotional and responsible man or be a shrewd, cold hearted and astute hypocrite? While embracing the "civilized" rubbish, we are losing those good virtues, which are the calls of the wild. Once we lose them, we are to lose ourselves, and we will get nowhere. I wish this dreadful thought is totally a fallacy, but, now, it is chilling me hard. One day when I happen to stand on the top of a grand mountain to observe a boundless prairie enveloped by the sapphire firmament and combed by gusts of the rhythmical west wind, a morning sun sprinkles me her warmth and brilliance in a graceful way, however, at that moment, I am afraid that I cannot appreciate these beauties, I am a lost " civilized man" then.
Please, please do not let come true while we are still able to answer the call of the wild.
㈦ 精灵旅社2观后感 用英语100字
精灵旅社2观后感 用英语100字，选部分借鉴，但是需要再Hotel后加上2，如下：
Hotel Transylvania has a simple concept: classic campy monsters staying
in a hotel where humans are not allowed because they think we're evil.
It doesn't sound too fresh but it looks fun. Behind this concept is a
father-daughter-relationship that seems to follow the footsteps of
other great recent animated films. The result is, it's not getting
there yet but it's still as delightful as it's suppose to be. It's one
of those films that it's so crazy, you'll instantly like it. Most of
the gags are clever and ridiculous. Overall, it's an endless fun
entertainment.
Though, the film sometimes feels like a mediocre animated kids film.
Generic family film elements are there but they are used in a different
way. There is often slapstick and toilet humor but the gags are best
when it's outrageously absurd. Every set pieces are swift, quirky, and
exciting. The voices of the characters sound silly at glance but the
actors made them pretty likable.
When the craziness slows down, there's a sweet bit of Dracula's
relationship between Mavis and Jonathan, and some brooding. The drama
is a little effective. It's not as strong as most recent animated
films. It's more focused at being fun and hilarious. It's great when it
stays to the roots of a cartoon like showing peculiar looking
characters acting like lunatics. The best laughs are when the monsters
are expressing their misanthropy in a ludicrously paranoid way, and
when they're just making fun of each other. Mainstream pop culture song
numbers kind of tone things down, but the song number at the end didn't
affect the breathtaking and emotional climax.
Hotel Transylvania is good enough for the whole family even though it's
raucous. Fans of the animation genre would enjoy this a lot more. Since
it's directed by a cartoon expert, it contains a lot of absurd and
exciting scenes that is similar to his shows. Although, some might
expect something more since many animated films these days are deeper
and powerful, leaving the old habits behind. Hotel Transylvania still
has the heart but it's just not as compelling as the others. If you're
in for the joys then this will give you a good time.
㈧ 我急急急急急急急急急急急需四篇100字的英语观后感，啥英语电影都可以
速度与激情6影评
This movie started off really well, however, it was set off course after the action started. I have to warn those that watched the trailers on television, because they spoiled every exciting scene from the movie. I would not consider myself an avid fan, but I have followed the series ever since the first movie and I would be the first one to tell you that this movie is a major disappointment. After Tokyo drift, the director relied heavily on action and random fillers to please the audience while leaving the fans frustrated and confused. And since when did the acronym "F&F" turn from fast and furious to fast and fighting? This series has started it's roots from racing and formed into another predictable action movie.
Now, to the ridiculous part of the review. The last scene with the cargo jet is beyond unrealistic. This scene was around 15 minutes long and I would like to point out that the take-off speed of a vast jet like that is around 150-200 mph (not to mention they had to increase speed in order to take-off e to the added weight). The runway must been around 50 miles long because they were on there for literally 15 minutes traveling at an average speed of 150mph+. And don't even get me started with the whole Gisele dying scene. The director got rid of her faster than all those V-8 powered engines put together!
I pointed out a bit of information what the reviewer "carl-walster" missed. He did an amazing job to point out how really ridiculous the movie really was. I have a great imagination, but this movie was too difficult to comprehend. And how could some of these other reviewers say this was the best of fast and furious? That's blasphemous!
㈨ 两篇英文读后感
Jane Eyre — A Beautiful Soul（简爱）
Jane Eyre, is a poor but aspiring, small in body but huge in soul, obscure but self-respecting girl. After we close the covers of the book, after having a long journey of the spirit, Jane Eyre, a marvelous figure, has left us so much to recall and to think:
We remember her goodness: for someone who lost arms and blinded in eyes, for someone who despised her for her ordinariness, and even for someone who had hurt her deeply in the past.
We remember her pursuit of justice. It’s like a companion with the goodness. But still, a virtuous person should promote the goodness on one side and must check the badness on the other side.
We remember her self-respect and the clear situation on equality. In her opinion, everyone is the same at the God’s feet. Though there are differences in status、in property and also in appearance, but all the human being are equal in personality.
We also remember her striving for life, her toughness and her confidence…
When we think of this girl, what she gave us was not a pretty face or a transcendent temperament that make us admire deeply, but a huge charm of her personality.
Her story makes us thinking about life and we learn much from her experience, at least, that is a fresh new recognition of the real beauty.
Learn to love and care（雾都孤儿）
Here I am sitting on a couch alone, thinking about what I have just finished reading with tears of sadness filling my eyes and fire of indignation filling my heart, which revived my exhausted soul that has already been covered by the cruelty and the selfishness of the secular world for a long time. It is truly what I felt after reading Oliver Twist, written by the prominent British author Charles Dickens.
The resonance between me and the book makes me feel not only the kindness and the wickedness of all the characters in the novel, but what this aloof society lacks, and what I lack deep inside. These supreme resources I’m talking about right now are somewhat different from minerals, oil that we usually mention. They’re abstract like feelings, and some kinds of spiritual stimulation that all of us desire anxiously from one another —— love and care.
Those charitable figures whom Dickens created in the novel are really what we need in life. They showed love and care to others, just as the gentle rain from the sky fell upon the earth, which was carved into my heart deeply.
Mr. Brownlow is one such person.
The other day he had one of his elaborate watches stolen by two skilled teenage thieves, Artful Dodger and Charley Bates, and thought naturally it was Oliver, who was an orphan and forced to live with a gang of thieves, that had done it because he was the only one near by after the theft had taken place. Being wrathful, he caught Oliver, and sent him to the police station where the ill-tempered, unfair magistrates worked. Fortunately for him, Oliver was proved innocent by one onlooker afterwards. With sympathy, Mr. Brownlow took the injured, poor Oliver to his own home. There Oliver lived freely and gleefully for some months as if he were Mr. Brownlow’s own son. One day, however, Mr. Brownlow asked Oliver to return some books to the bookseller and to send some money for the new books that he had already collected. The thief Oliver once stayed with kidnapped him. After that he disappeared in Mr. Brownlow’s life. Searching for a while, Mr. Brownlow had to believe the fact that he had run away with his money. But dramatically, they came across each other again a few years later. Without hesitation, Mr. Brownlow took Oliver home for the second time not caring if he had done something evil.
Perhaps most of us would feel confused about Mr. Brownlow’s reaction. But as a matter of fact, this is just the lesson we should learn from him. Jesus said in the Bible. “Forgive not seven times, but seventy-times seven.” Why is that? Because forgiveness is our ability to remove negative thoughts and neutralize them so our energy may be spent on doing what we came here for. We cannot move forward in our future if past issues cloud our thinking. Stop put Mr. Brownlow into the list of your models. Always give people a second chance no matter what they might have done. That’s also a substantial part of loving and caring others.
Charles Dickens said:“Love makes the world go around.” These immortal words have inspired and will keep on inspiring us to chant the melody of love and to say the prayer of care forevermore. Let us, therefore, enjoy life and treat other people lovingly. These principles are the roots and foundations of beliefs supporting this article and our mission together.
Pride and Prejudice （傲慢与偏见）
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters.
The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant.) Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
Leave Dead Man Island（亡灵岛）
Carol was once a happy and sunshiny girl. But after her father died in a plane crash, she became bad and took drugs. She had secrets in her heart and didn’t want others to know them. When Carol went to an island, she found the host had a bigger secret than hers: he had killed a girl in a car crash. So he needed an island to hide himself.
This is the story in Dead Man’s Island.
I think everybody has done something wrong and wants to keep the secrets in his or her heart. But do you know, even if we can escape from others’ eyes, we can’t escape from our own hearts.
I had been told a story like this: A woman felt ill and she went to see a doctor. The doctor examined her carefully and told the woman, ‘There is a tumor in your uterus. You’d better take an operation immediately.’ The woman agreed.
When the doctor cut open the woman’s abdomen, he got such a big surprise—there was a baby in the uterus, not a tumor. The doctor was sweating all over.
‘What to do? Take out the baby, or told the woman’s husband that it was just a tumor?’ ‘But … I am a doctor!’ He thought.
At last, the doctor sewed up the woman’s abdomen. When he told the woman’s husband the truth, the man didn’t move for a while. But then, the man jumped to the doctor, shouting at him. He was so angry and wanted to hit the doctor.
After the accident, a friend of the doctor’s asked him ‘Why did you do so? If you took out the baby, no one knows.’
‘But I know!’ said the doctor.
I have a very similar experience. That was a Monday, I was cleaning the classroom after school. John, my friend came up to me. He was looking for my maths teacher. But the teacher had been after work. So I told John to come again the next day. I said to myself, if I met the maths teacher, I would tell him that John had been looking for him.
When I was on my way home, I just looked at the ground, thinking about something. At that moment, my maths teacher came towards me and passed by. When I realized that, it was too late. The teacher had gone far away.
At night, when I was lying on the bed, my brain was full of the thing happened in the afternoon. The next day, John would find the maths teacher and not think about me, just as nothing happened. But I felt sorry for John. I wanted to do something for him, but I didn’t. Nobody knew what my idea was, but I knew.
Many things like the dead man on the island. After the crash, he made himself ‘dead’ and hid on the island. Maybe, he made others forget the crash, forget himself, but he couldn’t forget. He always felt remorseful and locked himself in his heart house.
What others think is not important, we should listen to ourselves.
I think every one may face sad things, like relatives’ death, missing the good high school, losing your best friends. Sometimes we feel cross and often ask ‘Why does the God do this to me?’
To let oneself feel better, we maybe do more wrong things. But happy and free time is transient. After that, we will have ourselves, hate life, hate everybody.
We want to forget, but can’t. more and more secrets are hidden in hearts. We close our window, and it is dark inside. Old days follow us forever, how we wanted the ‘man’ in the past can die. Nothing matters. Sadness is filled in our body. We live just like a dead man.
Escaping can do nothing. Beginning a new life is the most important, take sadness but live strongly.
When Carol left Dead Man island, I think she knew this all. The host influenced her. Don’t be remorseful any more, face new life, no hiding, no giving up the beautiful life, show the world a real self.
Leave Dead Man’s Island, let a bunch of sunshine get into your heart house.
Hamlet（哈姆雷特）
Shakspere (wrong spelling) created Hamlet--a man with wisdom and courage .In order to revenge on his uncle for killing his father, he pretented (spelling mistake) to be mad and suffered a series of misery. On the contrary, we can also say that Hamlet is rude and selfish for he did not think twice before his revenge . if (Capitalize "If" since it is the beginning word of the sentence.) a country has no king, how can a country keep alive (You need a question mark here since it is a question.) So, every thing has two sides, the bright side and ambral side. Every time we make a decision we have to think twice.
Comment:
Be careful with your spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Too many uncessary mistakes.
It is good that you looked at both the dark and bright sides of Hamlet. Thats quite objective and convincing.