Ⅰ 急需電影勇敢的心英文影評一篇100到200字就行，要簡單易懂的最好是先寫的，謝謝啦！
The Review of Braveheart
I am deeply impressed by William Wallace』s courage and the efforts that the Scottish created to resume soverienty.It reminds me of my dream.Dream,whatever it is,really should be pursued heart and soul.Compared to Wallace,I am so lazy and passive.I watched it,giving free outlet to my thoughts and tears.
There are two scenes over which I really feel melancholy.The initial is when Meilun is buried. The same point happened when Wallace was yong,weeping at the death of his father.Tiny Meilun sent him a purple thistle .to console his sorrow.Even so,Meilun is dead now,no a single would send him a purple thist any much more.He has only himself in this world following losing the two persons he loves most.The second one particular is the very first war against England in the battlefield.,in which they were much weaker in regard to weapons and numbers.Confronted with immense difficulties,they had been not afaid,thinking we would drop.Instead,they fighted bravely and confidently.
Life will not usually be what we want. Wallace』s father died when he was a small boy.He did not want this tragedy transpire but it did take place,so he had to accept it；when his uncle came and would part him with his hometown,he obeyed with reluctance；moreover,his heart was broken facing the death of Meilan,but he had to accept it and be strong.Adversity leads to prosperity on situation that we can turn sorrow into strength.
Much as what is stated above,courage alone won』t guarantee success.Wallace』s uncle informed him :」you have to find out to use your thoughts,then weapons.」Being flexiable and conscious is even more critical,that is to say ,you know how to obtain your goal prior to you take actions.Additionally,it is worth notifying that pals are also extremely important in the pursue of dream.A life devoid of a pal is a life with out a sun.Wallace has Hamiss,who accompanied him to the end.
以上為整篇影評，你可以按自己的要求摘取某段或某句，這里的單詞也不算很生
Ⅱ 拜託了，急啊！勇敢的心 英文觀後感
Hills, bagpipes, mist, the word 「Scotland」 written along the bottom of the screen – it can only be one place. That』s right, Wales. Nah, only joking – as if anyone would ever make a film about Wales.
Mel Gibson both directed and starred in this tartan-clad epic about William Wallace, the legendary Scottish freedom fighter/terrorist who, even way back in the 14th Century, had already had enough of the English going on about winning the World Cup in 1966. So, armed with just some rocks, a few hundred muck-dwellers and an extremely peculiar accent, he led a nation to fight for freedom from English tyranny. Or something along those lines.
It』s actually fairly appropriate to be so vague about all of this, because nobody really knows all that much about the real Wallace (and most of what we do know comes from a poem). You could spend a lifetime picking apart the historical inaccuracies in the flick, and there would still be those who』d disagree with what you found.
Because of that, how much enjoyment you can get from this 177-minute beast depends largely on your willingness to accept Wallace as a charmer with biting wit and a permanently clean-shaven chin. As the sort of bloke beautiful French princesses would hand over national secrets to simply because of the way he looks at them. Or even just as a guy who doesn』t smell like moss.
The most breath-taking, if gruesome, parts of the movie are the incredibly lifelike battle scenes. Putting them together must have been an immense project to undertake, but you』ve got to hand it to Gibbers – he does it very, very well. He also makes a likable hero figure, providing you can put to the back of your mind the fact that he』s basically playing the original ned.
Personally I find the movie far too long, particularly as parts of it play like a TV advert for the Scottish Tourist Board. In one scene, for example, Wallace sprints to the top of a mountain and just stands there, kilt billowing, for no apparent reason. Anyone who』s ever worn a kilt will of course know that the last place you』re likely to linger is a-top a windy Scottish mountain. Talk about 「freedom」!!
2
Long before The Passion of the Christ, Mel Gibson directed another cinematic masterpiece, Braveheart. Filmed against the backdrop of majestic mountains and rolling meadows, it tells the historically-based (yet not entirely accurate) story of William Wallace, a common man』s warrior who led the Scottish people in rebellion against King Edward I, also known as 「Longshanks」. Written by Randall Wallace, an American tourist fascinated with a Scottish statue of his namesake, the script collected st in Hollywood for over a decade before Gibson made the brilliant decision to put it on the big screen. Just like The Passion, it』s a decision he would not regret.
Set in the 11th Century, Braveheart catalogues the struggle of Scottish serfs who labor under the brutal oppression of English occupation forces. Amidst these terrible conditions, William Wallace (Mel Gibson) falls in love with Murron MacClannough (Catherine McCormack). Insistent on not sharing his wife (a proclamation by the king gives local rulers 「first-night rights」 to new brides) Wallace secretly marries Murron. Nevertheless, an English knight assaults her, sparking a fight with Wallace. Fleeing the village, Wallace believes Murron has escaped and will soon meet him at a secret rendezvous point. But Murron is captured and executed by the king』s emissaries.
Angered by his wife』s murder, Wallace instigates a local rebellion, slaughtering all the king』s loyalists in his village. As his rebellion grows, a distraught Longshanks (Patrick McGoohan) dispatches his fabled Northern Army to destroy it. But the heroic Wallace delivers a stirring speech to rouse his men, while deploying an ingenious battlefield trick to defeat the king』s cavalry.
With the power and legend of Wallace growing day by day, Longshanks relies on his daughter-in-law, Princess Isabelle (Sophie Marceau) to broker a truce. But Isabelle』s power is limited, and Wallace realizes his people can only win freedom if backed by the Scottish nobles. Their appointed leader is Robert the Bruce (Angus MacFadyen) who vacillates between his own idealistic views and his father』s pessimistic pragmatism. Will the nobles join with Wallace? Will the Scots win their freedom? Only history tells us the answer.
With elaborate costumes, vivid battle scenes, and a noble hero as its focal point, Braveheart is more than your typical run-of-the-mill action movie. Part history, part Hollywood heroism - its timeless idealism strikes a cord with every viewer. In fact, the movie itself led to a revival in nationalistic pride that fueled the successful Scottish independence movement of the 1990s. It』s a testament to the strength and character of the real life William Wallace. A thousand years later, his enring legacy continues to transform the European landscape, and Mel Gibson captures the noble warrior』s passion with an awe-inspiring Academy Award-winning masterpiece.
3
BRAVEHEART is set in Scotland in the 1200s. It tells the true story of William Wallace who was a famous commoner who led his people in a rebellion against the English. The movie is of epic proportions, length and grandeur. We learn the entire history of William Wallace from the age of 8 until his death.
Mel Gibson, in what I found to be his best role ever, plays the grown up Wallace. Gibson directs the movie as well. The story is full of fascinating history of which I knew little. I have a good English history background but was surprised at what little early Scottish history I knew. Wallace wants to live in peace and ignore the English atrocities he has witnessed, but circumstances force his hand, and he declares war on the English. His battle cry is freedom and many poor people follow him in his quest. The story itself is quite compelling, and the script is excellent.
The political intrigue among the Scottish nobles makes you wonder whose side they are on. As the story unfolds, you come to realize that they are only interested in enriching themselves and do not care about their own people. They constantly counsel Wallace to compromise his ideas in order to achieve some lesser, but more practical solution. His vision is a singular one of freedom for his people. I found myself thinking of Gary Cooper in THE FOUNTAINHEAD and the similarity between his role and that of Gibson's. All of the leaders who were the "wisest" urged constant compromise on their rising young stars in both movies.
Actually, the movie most like BRAVEHEART is GETTYSBURG for both had huge and realistic battle scenes with wave after wave of humans charging each other and dying. Of course, many people will compare BRAVEHEART with ROB ROY. They are both about old Scottish heroes, and in my book, BRAVEHEART wins hands down. Finally, you may find yourself thinking of the Judas story from the Bible except here the movie has a plethora of Judases.
One example of the quality of the script is that the writer manages to introce a very funny character without it seeming like merely a plot device, which of course it is. This character is a mad Irishman who steals every scene he is in with his dialog. I laughed out loud many times. Although there was little humor in this serious tale, there was just enough to keep me from ever tiring even though I had to stay seated for three hours.
Too often period pieces seem like merely exercises in style. I found QUEEN MARGOT to be one such movie. Here the wonderful costumes and set decoration feel totally authentic but in a natural way. I felt like I was actually in the thirteenth century where people's faces were frequently dirty and in general personal hygiene was minimal. When they made their kills in battle or in revenge, I could sense how close they were to animals then. The blood would splat on their faces, and they could just as easy have been wolves.
I have been to Scotland many times and it is gorgeous. In a low key but quite impressive way, the cinematography makes one feel the beauty and the isolation of countryside. The music with the recurring and haunting melody of the lone Scottish bagpipe sets a sad and yet serene tone and mood.
BRAVEHEART runs a long, but well worth it, 2:52. I would not want it shorten. It is rated R, but NC-17 would be more appropriate. It is THE goriest movie I have ever seen and that too I would not change because it allows one to vicariously live through what actual battles in that period would be like. Please be warned that you will see almost every part of the human body being chopped off or stabbed in one scene or another. Imagine any physical horror, and there is probably a scene of it in BRAVEHEART. Nevertheless, there was not one scene where I thought the violence was gratuitous. I would let older teenagers see the movie, but would be careful with impressionable younger ones.
4
When pagan Saxons invaded Britain pushing the native Celtic tribes back in the mountains of the west and the north of the country they couldn't have known what difficulties they leave to future generations. One of the difficulties were Scots, though they weren't much affected by the pagan invasion.
Throughout the history, Scots (as a tribe from Ireland was in 360 mentioned by Romans) had a changing luck in battles, whoever they fought. They had had many various allies and fought against many various enemies, including their former or future allies (politics).
Originally based in Ireland, the Scottish tribe later established their kingdom on the west coast and isles of today's Scotland (between years 501 and 503). Generally, they were never good friends with tribes which lived on the isle, called Britannia by the Romans, before them; perhaps because they came from Ivernia, today's Ireland...
The intolerance between the two sides resulted in many battles and rebellions. In 600, 300 Edinburgh horseman were killed by the English, in 1014 king Malcom II defeated the Danes, four years later another victory was won on the river Tweed, at Carham, against the army of Anglo-Saxons (particularly Northumbrians). On the other hand, king Duncan was defeated by the English and killed by famous character of the Scottish history, MacBeth, who is defeated in 1057 by Malcolm Canmore in the battle of Lumphanan etcetera etcetera.
Then, in the year of approximately 1272, William Walace is born in Ellerslie. He is fated to become one of the most important characters of the history of Scots. In age of twenty-five years, he kills sheriff (originally shire-reeve) of Lanark and a revolt is unleashed. Perhaps many Scots were waiting for a leader to emerge, because the same year Wallace defeats the English at Stirling Bridge.
His luck changed when he was defeated at Falkirk in 1298. In 1305, he is betrayed and executed brutally, his head being mounted on London Bridge.
That is a very rough outline of a life so very important, of the life of William Wallace, a thorough Scot, exactly the William Wallace about whom this movie is. His father was killed by the English, his wife was murdered by the sheriff of Lanark (which is a reason why the sheriff ended up equally) - no mercy could have been awaited from a man that had never seen mercy on the side of his enemies.
Braveheart is a heroic epic told compactly and relatively objectively, noticing everything important that most probably happened in the life of William Wallace. After all, it doesn't have to be historically exact - it is a legend and even if it was "only" a legend, it would be a most impressive one.
5
Back in 1995 when I first saw this movie I was wowed, it was a cinematic epic and one which I thoroughly enjoyed.... a few years later when I met my future spouse I was subjected to this movie on a weekly basis and now I cannot bare to watch it.
Anyway back to the movie, if you have been living under a rock and haven't seen it here's the basic story Mel Gibson plays William Wallace a Scottish highlander who leads his people in a uprising against the English monarch.
Now just so you know this film however "based" on historical events is completely inaccurate, Wallace was in actual fact a Scottish Noble (his family was rich), Wallace never had a wife, and the French princess Mel gets jiggy with would've been around 8 years old at the time, the only real truth in the movie was that he was hung drawn and quartered and he lead an uprising...the rest is Hollywood bullsh*t.
I'm giving the film 4 stars because if you are unaware of the historical inaccuracies and you haven't seen it 100 times you will be entertained, its a good movie.
Ⅲ 求勇敢的心觀後感一篇，英文的，300字左右
華萊士，終其一生都是一個鬥士，一個為了愛情而斗的鬥士，一個為了自由而斗的鬥士，一個為了國家和命運而斗的鬥士。他是一個讓人尊敬的英雄。
首先是華萊士他的成長，對他而言，真正的成長是在失去了父親以後。之前他只不過是一個單純的小孩而已。當他看到那個小屋裡被人弔死的同胞，他只是一種震嚇，一般小孩一樣驚嚇而已。但他父親哥哥死後，他變得勇敢，敢於直面死亡了，面對他父親和哥哥的遺體，他變得如此平靜。再後來，他叔叔把他帶走，說是人要先學會用他的腦袋才能真正的戰斗，把他帶去接受教育，這個是他的故事的開端，也是他生命意義上的長大了。
其次是他的愛情，這部片他的愛情分成了兩部分。一個就是和小時候的梅倫，一個美麗的蘇格蘭姑娘，一個在他父親的葬禮後送了一枝花安慰他的人。華萊士求學有成後回來向他求婚。因為當時貴族享有初夜權的原因，他們在森林裡偷偷的結婚了，這里可以體現出他的一種反抗的精神，一種本能的叛逆。但他們的愛情沒有維系多久，因為梅倫的美麗太耀眼了，貴族殺了梅倫，這是蘇格蘭和英格蘭的戰斗的導火線，因為這引發了華萊士的爆發，揭竿而起，各地響應。第二段是與皇後的感情。皇後丈夫本來就是個同性戀，包辦的婚姻讓她感覺不到愛情的存在，根本沒有感情可言。缺乏了愛情的滋潤，讓為愛情而起的華萊士走進了她的心靈，她自然為華萊士的豪情傾倒了。而華萊士則是在為了自由而奮身博殺，因為失去了梅倫，他一直在為了他的信念作戰，皇後的美麗和善良感動了他，兩顆乾枯的心就這樣融在了一起。
Ⅳ 請問誰有《勇敢的心》英文簡介，要短，30個單詞就好，
What kind of man would defy a king?
Every man dies, not every man really lives.
His passion captivated a woman. His courage inspired a nation. His heart defied a king.
He who fought, fought for freedom.
一部具有深刻民族主義和政治內涵的史詩巨片
一段纏綿而令人盪氣回腸的鐵血柔情
一部悲壯的血淚傳奇
《勇敢的心》（Braveheart），是1995年上映的美國影片，情節根據蘇格蘭民族英雄威廉·華萊士的事跡改編，梅爾·吉布森擔任該片的導演、主演和製片人。
《勇敢的心》獲得了1995年度奧斯卡獎的「最佳影片」、「最佳導演」、「最佳攝影」、「最佳化妝」、「最佳音效剪輯」5項大獎。
由於《勇敢的心》的成功，在日後對於同類型的史詩戰爭片有不少的啟迪，包括《神鬼戰士》、《亞歷山大大帝》、《特洛伊：木馬屠城》、《300壯士》等皆有受其影響。
Braveheart is a 1995 Academy-award winning historical action-drama film proced and directed by Mel Gibson, who also starred in the title role. The film was written for screen and then novelized by Randall Wallace. Gibson portrays a legendary Scot, William Wallace, who gained recognition when he came to the forefront of the First War of Scottish Independence by opposing Edward I of England (portrayed by Patrick McGoohan) and subsequently abetted by Edward's daughter-in-law Princess Isabelle (played by Sophie Marceau) and a claimant to the Scottish throne, Robert the Bruce (played by Angus Macfadyen).
The film won five Academy Awards at the 68th Academy Awards, including the Academy Award for Best Picture and Best Director, and had been nominated for an additional five. The film was proced by Icon Proctions for Paramount Pictures and 20th Century Fox.
Ⅳ 《勇敢的心》觀後感(3)
《勇敢的心》觀後感（精選10篇）
Wallace終究是死了，曾經兩度失信的Bruce在陣前對著蘇格蘭人，深吸一口氣，喊道：「你們曾經和華萊士一起流血!」他抽出長劍，「現在，請你們跟我一起流血吧!」蘇格蘭人振奮了，他們發出了震天動地的叫喊聲：「Wallace——Wallace——」於是，他們打得如詩一般美麗，打得一點都不失蘇格蘭人的面子，為自己贏得了Wallace同樣信仰和追求的自由和勝利。
那把無數次在Wallace手中出現的劍插在一大片綠地上，劍柄上紅色的綢帶一直飄揚到影片的最後，就像是勝利者的墓誌銘。
勇敢的心，勇敢地活著。
《勇敢的心》一直被視為一部悲壯的、融合血淚傳奇的史詩片，在影片中，人們常常為蘇格蘭那綿延的山脈、凄婉的風笛和蘇格蘭人民在貧困痛苦中發出的凄厲呼號所感動，也為華萊士一往無前的精神所鼓舞。威廉?華萊士的精神就如同一面旗幟，指引著蘇格蘭人民爭取到了最後的自由。他做到了，他沒有白白犧牲。整部影片圍繞的主題是「自由」
，為自由而戰，為自由而勇敢，「勇敢的心」指的還有勇於面對自己，絕不背叛自己的真意，那就是真正地活過了，在肉體的死亡中也能得到精神上的永生。我們經常會問自己什麼對自己最為重要，我認為華萊士用他最後一句話告訴了我們答案：「Freedom」。
濃郁的色調，時急時緩的音樂，血腥的打鬥，堅定的眼神，這便是由梅爾吉普森自導自演的電影《勇敢的心》。電影以英格蘭和蘇格蘭的矛盾為大歷史背景，從而向人們講述了一個主由人公威廉姆。華萊士領導蘇格蘭人民反對英格蘭貴族統治爭取自由的扣人心弦的故事。電影將英雄華萊士的形象塑造得很成功，並將其勇敢的心路歷程展現得淋漓盡致，讓我真正體味到了什麼是真正的勇敢。
在影片的開頭，我們看到的小華萊士雖然置身於英格蘭貴族的奴役之下，但在他的眼裡我們看到更多的是純真，童趣，直到當他第一次看到被懸掛在谷倉里的同伴和鄉民屍體時，我們才看到在他單純的眼裡流露出了對死亡的驚恐。緊接著死亡便叩響了他們家的大門，面對父親和哥哥的死亡。本在開心等著父親和哥哥歸來的小華萊士等來的卻是一輛載著他們屍體的馬車，他不敢面對，繼續做著自己的事來掩飾內心的痛苦，甚至不敢相信這是事實，最終還是在父親戰友的召喚下來到父親哥哥屍體的旁邊，撫摸著父親那冷冰冰的屍體，任憑淚水噙滿眼眶卻絲毫沒有復仇的躁動。
他必須勇敢的接受這一事實，必須學會面對死亡，讓內心強大起來。很多年後當他再次回到這片土地時，他勇敢的追求屬於自己的愛情，追求在父親葬禮上送自己花朵的女孩美倫，並與美倫秘密結婚，出於對英格蘭貴族享有少女初夜權的無聲的反抗。然而幸福很短暫，美倫的美貌遭來貴族的垂涎，在反抗中被貴族殘忍的殺害。這便激起了華萊士內心復仇的火花，開始武力反抗英格蘭貴族。隨後各地雲集響應，勢如破竹。與前兩次不同的是，在妻子美倫的葬禮上，華萊士沒再掉眼淚。因為他明白他是一個男人，可以勇敢的去面對並且對此不再無奈。因此美倫的死讓他放棄了回家過安穩日子的初衷，而是勇敢的去追求屬於自己屬於民族的自由。故事發展到這里，華萊士一直備受親人愛人離去的煎熬，似乎註定孤苦一人的遭遇讓我們深感同情。但我們又看到，華萊士已在痛苦的剝離中正慢慢的成長，一顆勇敢的心開始真正地被歷練。
華萊士的勇敢並非是莽撞而是夾有智慧的，這充分體現在兩次戰役中。面對在英格蘭強大的軍隊，無論是武器裝備還是人數，華萊士領導的蘇格蘭軍隊都是無法與之相抗衡的，但是華萊士並沒有因此而退卻而誠服於英格蘭國王，相反他讓戰士准備長矛，在戰場上又激勵戰士大增軍隊士氣，採取分戰術，在與敵人浴血奮戰後終取得第一次戰爭的勝利。
第二次戰爭在華萊士的精心准備之下，利用柏油箭火燃燒敵人側後方，眼看戰爭勝負已分，就在觀眾大快人心之時，故事突然發生了轉變，華萊士的同盟者莫納叛變了，他沒有率軍加入已殺入重圍的華萊士，致使華萊士軍隊損失慘重，華萊士自己也在戰爭中負傷，在他沖出重圍去刺殺國王時，被一個騎兵攔住，在和騎兵廝打中發現騎兵竟是莫納，他本可以輕而義舉的殺掉莫納但他沒有而是痛苦的躺下了，不為別的只為這種同族間的背叛而痛心，但是這一切並未阻礙他繼續反抗英格蘭貴族的步伐，接下來便是勇敢的去復仇，去殺掉這次反叛背後的始作俑者，這是對背叛民族行為的懲罰，也是對死去同胞們的交待，這一切雖然有血腥，有殘忍，但絲毫沒有減退華萊士在觀眾心中的英雄形象，在觀眾眼中華萊士反而成為一個集智慧勇氣於一身的具有傳奇色彩人物。
影片的結局是出人意料但卻又在情理之中的，讓人意外的是華萊士這個充滿神奇色彩的英雄不是犧牲在戰場，而是落入英格蘭手中被英格蘭當局處死。情理之中則是他又一次相信莫納一夥一提出的聯合並單刀赴會，結果他再次被他們出賣，並被押往英格蘭法庭被定為叛國罪。這次華萊士表現得很從容，雖然他知道等待他的將是酷刑和死亡。在服刑場上，華萊士面對的是麻木愚鈍的民眾們對他的不理解和嗤之以鼻，聽到的是民眾們對行刑者的大聲附和，可華萊士似乎並不在乎，此刻在他眼裡只看到一個小孩子的笑臉，透過笑臉他似乎看到了希望。在身體受到酷刑的摧殘後，他依然不卑不亢，就在最後關頭他依然用盡全身力量大聲喊出自由二字，似乎是在提醒所有的人，去勇敢的追求自由。
看完整部影片，我想到了我國古代的神話故事《誇父追日》，誇父一生都在追求溫暖結果卻因此而死，電影的主人公華萊士也因自己的追求而死，但不同的是誇父死後為後人留下的是一片鄧林，隱蔽後人。而華萊士死後留下的卻是一顆鼓勵後人為自由不斷去追求的'勇敢的心，激勵著他那個時代的人去繼承他的遺志而繼續努力，同時也激勵著我們觀眾，去勇敢的追求自己想要的一切，正如華萊士父親夢中對他說「你的心是自由的，去勇敢的追求自由」
華萊士，終其一生都是一個鬥士，一個為了愛情而斗的鬥士，一個為了自由而斗的鬥士，一個為了國家和命運而斗的鬥士，是一個讓人尊敬的英雄。
首先是華萊士他的成長，對他而言，真正的成長是在失去了父親以後。之前他只不過是一個單純的小孩而已。當他看到那個小屋裡被人弔死的同胞，他只是一種震嚇，一般小孩一樣驚嚇而已。但他父親哥哥死後，他變得勇敢，敢於直面死亡了，面對他父親和哥哥的遺體，他變得如此平靜。再後來，他叔叔把他帶走，說是人要先學會用他的腦袋才能真正的戰斗，把他帶去接受教育，這個是他的故事的開端，也是他生命意義上的長大了。
其次是他的愛情，這部片他的愛情分成了兩部分。一個就是和小時候的梅倫，一個美麗的蘇格蘭姑娘，一個在他父親的葬禮後送了一枝花安慰他的人。華萊士求學有成後回來向他求婚。因為當時貴族享有初夜權的原因，他們在森林裡偷偷的結婚了，這里可以體現出他的一種反抗的精神，一種本能的叛逆，但他們的愛情沒有維系多久，因為梅倫的美麗太耀眼了，貴族殺了梅倫，這是蘇格蘭和英格蘭的戰斗的導火線，因為這引發了華萊士的爆發，揭竿而起，各地響應。第二段是與皇後的感情。皇後丈夫本來就是個同性戀，包辦的婚姻讓她感覺不到愛情的存在，根本沒有感情可言。缺乏了愛情的滋潤，讓為愛情而起的華萊士走進了她的心靈，她自然為華萊士的豪情傾倒了。而華萊士則是在為了自由而奮身博殺，因為失去了梅倫，他一直在為了他的信念作戰，皇後的美麗和善良感動了他，兩顆乾枯的心就這樣融在了一起。
再說說他的戰斗，華萊士開始戰斗的時候，是因為貴族殺了他的妻子梅倫，可以說是一個簡單的復仇行動，但事情一開始就不能再受到控制的，尤其是領導權掌握在一個聰明人的手裡。後來，他們起義得到了各地不斷的支持，這讓人看到了蘇格蘭的自由希望。一個方面是因為他們蘇格蘭的人受迫壓太久了，再加上華萊士所學的智慧，他們勢如破竹，這就很讓人，特別是愛德華心慌了。想盡辦法招安華萊士，最後還是利用了一個騙局把華萊士抓了。
最後，在砍頭台。這里是這部片的一個精華了，思想就是在這里的。行刑前，兩個小丑在那裡舞盡丑態，讓人發笑，但也是說明了英國人的行為恰恰就是兩個小丑所為。華萊士就刑，行人對這位英雄扔雞蛋、爛菜，恰恰說明了國民的麻木和愚昧。後來在刑台上，華萊士受盡了各樣殘酷的折磨，下面則是一片歡呼聲。華萊士就刑前，看到那個小孩在笑，可能這里也是一個希望的延續，把希望寄託給了後人。那聲振饋發聾的「freedom」讓人久久不能放下思想，激人不斷前進。可以說，在刑台這段，是鮮明的對比讓這個自由的精神體現的淋漓盡致的。一邊是鬥士、英雄，一邊是愚昧的國民；一邊是前進中的先鋒，一邊是止步不前的落伍者。差距就在這里體現了，代溝在這里產生。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因為這里有可貴的思想——自由。沒有自由了你們還能幹什麼？也許是真的，我們也該好好思量思量。
《勇敢的心》是由導演梅爾·吉布森執導，片長177分鍾，1995年5月18日在美國上映。
威廉華萊士童年時，其父、蘇格蘭民族英雄馬索華萊士在與英軍的斗爭中犧牲，他開始接受父親好友的指導，學習蘇格蘭文化和武術。青年華萊士（梅爾吉布森）學成回到故鄉，向美麗的少女梅倫求婚，不想梅倫被英軍搶去且遭殺害。在廣大村民「英雄之後」的呼聲中，華萊士率眾揭竿起義，並與蘇格蘭貴族羅伯結成聯盟，但不久他發現，蘇格蘭貴族考慮的只是自身的利益。
英王為緩和局勢，派伊莎貝拉（蘇菲瑪索）前去和華萊士談判，由於英王只想收買華萊士，根本不顧蘇格蘭人民的自由和平等，談判失敗，但這一切並不為伊莎貝拉所知。伊莎貝拉歸國後發現事情真相，且知曉英王正策劃陰招，忙送信給華萊士，而兩人的愛情，也在戰爭與陰謀中悄然滋生。
這是一部經典的影片，曾經觀賞過，本次算是經典回顧了。雖然影片的名字叫做勇敢的心，我覺得叫自由更契合主題。當主人公不斷強化自由的觀念時，我不禁想起那首著名的詩句：生命誠可貴，愛情價更高。若為自由故，兩者皆可拋。還想起國學大家陳寅恪給王國維著名那句的墓誌銘：獨立之精神，自由之思想。
當蘇菲瑪索出場的時候，我特別後悔前些天對阿佳妮的評價，看完《羅丹的情人》我覺得阿佳妮比蘇菲瑪索還要驚艷。可能是太久沒有看蘇菲瑪索，印象有些模糊。但是，我錯了，再見蘇菲瑪索，那張臉那雙眼，無法超越，永遠的女神。
保持那份渴望自由的心。
歷史像深夜裡浩瀚無際的天空一樣，那樣純潔、美麗，使人充滿無限的遐思，你看那點點的繁星，裝飾著那深藍色的「幕布」，一閃一閃的，充滿著生命的活力。愛我看來，人類幾千年的歷史就像那浩瀚的藍天，而那充滿活力的繁星，一閃一閃的，它們就是歷史長河中無數的英雄，他們那高潔的品格，崇高的人格魅力，偉大的奉獻和如傳奇一般的人生深深地吸引，感動著我們，使我們久久不能忘懷。
在我看來，英雄註定有著傳奇般的一生和令人遺憾的逝去。而威廉也正是一個這樣的人。他擁有一個如水晶般透明的心，小心地珍藏著他孩童時期的愛情，他對他的妻子的愛有如火一般熱烈，彼此間簡單單純而又熱烈地愛著對方。然而他又擁有一顆岩石般堅定的心。當他看到自己的妻子慘死在英格蘭人的刀下，他毅然決然地踏上了一條漫長而又艱辛的反抗之路。盡管在一些人看來，那是無稽之談，盡管在一些人看來，那是一條不歸路，但堅定而又勇敢的他還是選擇了勇往直前，堅定自己的選擇，完成自己勇敢者的游戲。
「英雄」之所以是英雄，那不尋常的，超出世人的一點是有一顆勇敢的心，也許每個人都會堅定地認為自己是一個勇敢的人，但當你直面死亡時，你會怎樣呢?或是當你直面受盡折磨而死時，你會直面樣呢?擁有一顆「勇敢的心」的威廉在兩中截然不同的死法面前，毅然放棄了弱者的選擇-服毒而死，堅持直面敵人殘忍的蹂躪，只為向兇殘的英格蘭人證明，蘇格蘭人是不畏懼死亡的。蘇格蘭人最終會得到自由的，他那最後的一聲呼喊「FREEDOM」為英格蘭人喚起了戰爭的鬥志和勝利的希望。
也許，真正的英雄不一定被所有的人所銘記，真正的英雄不一定被所有的人認可，真正的英雄不一定擁有金子般閃耀的一生和一個快樂的絕句，但我相信，真正的英雄一定有一顆勇敢的心。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因為這里有可貴的思想——自由。沒有自由了你們還能幹什麼？也許是真的，我們也該好好思量思量。
信仰是需要代言人的，就像宗教信仰中需要耶穌像和人間的發言人教皇一樣，自由需要的是精神領袖。華萊士的出現是一種必然更是一種結果。他死後曾經用過的那把大劍更是繼承這種精神上的傳揚，就像「神像」，有了他每個人就有了希望，有了他就能集結更多的自由人，有了他就象徵了勝利。在最後漢密斯擲出華萊士的那把大劍在天空中劃出完美的曲線最後穩穩的插在地上時，勝利已經被預示了。其實不需要後面的旁白我們也能猜得到結局——蘇格蘭贏得了自由。當你追尋一種事物的信念成為一種執著時，那麼他已經成為了一種信仰。
什麼是勇敢？是源於自己面對困境，以智慧與毅力為戰斗的武器，再把原先狹隘的個人追求，升華為為有著共同遭遇的人的利益而斗爭。這樣，即便是源於私心，也能為別人所接受，得到別人的幫助，最終喚醒我們沉睡的勇氣。原本華萊士只是想回家娶妻生子，過平凡安定的生活，但是他終究被逼上了追求自由的道路。他沉睡的心靈蘇醒了過來，也讓曾經搖擺不定的貴族ROBERT覺醒，放棄了英格蘭的加冕，拔出利劍，帶領著蘇格蘭的平明軍隊，咆哮著向英軍沖殺過去。
閑著無聊，又重溫了下勇敢的心這部電影。悠揚的風笛聲伴著蘇格蘭的美景，讓人神往。
被結尾華萊士那句「freedom」深深的震撼了，蘇格蘭確實是一個屢遭磨難的民族。英國的原始居民是凱爾特人；由於英國很早被羅馬政府殖民，所以凱爾特人的文明程度很長時間高於歐洲大陸。凱爾特人一開始就被羅馬人奴役，隨著歐洲蠻族勢力的入侵，羅馬帝國實力的衰退，羅馬人退出了英倫小島。傳說中亞瑟王的原型就是羅馬當時在英格蘭的駐軍軍官，因為不願離去而帶領自己曾經的敵人凱爾特人和羅馬戍邊軍團的後裔與入侵的野蠻人盎格魯和薩克森人作戰。在公元七世紀左右，在目前德法一帶的盎格魯人和薩克森人開始入侵英國（他們應該也算日耳曼人的一支），並將凱爾特人逐漸驅逐到愛爾蘭和蘇格蘭一帶；直到11世紀的諾曼征服，來自北歐的海盜佔領了法國的諾曼並被法王所承認，後來諾曼人佔領了英格蘭，但由於諾曼人人數太少，所以盎格魯「薩格森人仍然保存著大量的貴族地主。
所以，在蘇格蘭廣大的老百姓實際是凱爾特人，在勇敢的心裡描述的戰爭就是是早來的征服者蘇格蘭的盎格魯」薩克森貴族和新來的征服者諾曼人的戰爭。蘇格蘭人經歷過3個外來民族的統治和奴役，甚至諾曼人為了吸引更多的英格蘭貴族去蘇格蘭，而頒布了初夜權的法令，令人發指。
蘇格蘭人從來沒有間斷過自己對外來入侵者的反抗，但是蘇格蘭長期以來形成了多個氏族部落，一直沒有一個強有力的中央集權統治國家。很容易被入侵者分而制之或以利分化。蘇格蘭和英格蘭的統一，也是貴族間的妥協（蘇格蘭貴族很多都有兩國的封號，牆頭草兩頭倒）民眾仍然對英格蘭人很仇視，及時是今天也是如此。
雖然威廉「華萊士被認為是蘇格蘭歷史上最偉大的民族英雄之一；但蘇格蘭人心目中真正的英雄實際是片中那個最後悔悟的叛徒羅伯特。布魯斯！羅伯特。布魯斯歷史上不僅沒有叛變過，而且一直堅持與英格蘭斗爭；也許有人讀過一篇英文課外讀物，裡面講一名蘇格蘭王子屢次被敵人打敗；最後逃到一個城堡，在絕望之際看到一支蜘蛛結網，每次都失敗直到第七次終於把網結成了；王子受到了鼓舞，重整旗鼓再次戰斗終於贏得了勝利。 這里講的就是在最後為蘇格蘭贏得獨立（也就是片子的結尾）的班諾克本之戰之前的傳說。
羅伯特。布魯斯後來成為蘇格蘭國王，在他死後一名蘇格蘭騎士帶著他的心臟想要埋葬到耶路撒冷；路上經過西班牙遇到和摩爾人的戰爭，這名騎士在沖鋒前舉起羅伯特。布魯斯的心臟高喊」勇敢的心呀，帶領我沖鋒吧！「 ，最後這名騎士還是犧牲了；第二天一名倖存的蘇格蘭騎士在屍體堆里找到了羅伯特。布魯斯的心臟並帶回蘇格蘭喪於一個修道院里；這才是真正的勇敢的心，有個蘇格蘭的詩人還寫了一篇詩來歌頌布魯斯，其中有一句就是A noble heart cannot be at peace if freedom is lacking 勇敢的心 其實更大程度上應該說的是布魯斯而不是華萊士，看來國外的電影和國內的也有的拼 ，也喜歡戲說。
;Ⅵ 跪求一偏《勇敢的心》英語作文觀後感，要求原創，200詞以上帶翻譯，重謝……
Braveheart was a huge deal when it first came out. I never really watched the film properly until recently. As a frequent cinema-goer since my youth I was not a part of the mid-nineties cultural phenomenon that was Braveheart's release in Scotland. I did turn up at the the cinema, the old Odeon in Edinburgh, but the queue went round the block (the literal term for a blockbuster) and there was no way in hell I was prepared to wait for three hours on a gray September afternoon (a choice I came to regret). Every subsequent attempt since then was blocked. I never rented the video as I didn't want to watch in pan-and-scan. The fact that every single living Scottish person had seen it apart from myself really got on my nerves, and I was quite bitter about it. And then, as the fever died down, I just kind of forgot about it and moved on.
Watching it fully as an alt I think I probably enjoy it more now that I would have done as a teenager. It's certainly a huge epic right up there with the best of them. Mel Gibson captures the pretty side of Scotland wonderfully with his scope photography accompanied by James Horner's bittersweet score. The film never really feels three hours long, the time just disappears.
Nearly every notable Scottish actor (apart from Connery and Connelly) appears at some point. From the brilliant (Brian Cox) to the dreary and pretentious (Peter Mullan). Keep a lookout for Tommy Flanagan too, in one of his earlier roles.
The battle scenes are impressive, but I wish there were more gory. Gibson's first cut of the film was apparently bloodier, I wish it had remained intact. But despite the grim satisfaction of seeing the English aggressors getting splattered the fact that Scotland IS still ruled by England kind renders Wallace's bravery irrelevant. It may have been 700 years ago, but I hate the fact that he ultimately died for nothing. We DON'T have a country of our own, plain and si-mp-le.
華萊士，終其一生都是一個鬥士，一個為了愛情而斗的鬥士，一個為了自由而斗的鬥士，一個為了國家和命運而斗的鬥士。他是一個讓人尊敬的英雄。
首先是華萊士他的成長，對他而言，真正的成長是在失去了父親以後。之前他只不過是一個單純的小孩而已。當他看到那個小屋裡被人弔死的同胞，他只是一種震嚇，一般小孩一樣驚嚇而已。但他父親哥哥死後，他變得勇敢，敢於直面死亡了，面對他父親和哥哥的遺體，他變得如此平靜。再後來，他叔叔把他帶走，說是人要先學會用他的腦袋才能真正的戰斗，把他帶去接受教育，這個是他的故事的開端，也是他生命意義上的長大了。
其次是他的愛情，這部片他的愛情分成了兩部分。一個就是和小時候的梅倫，一個美麗的蘇格蘭姑娘，一個在他父親的葬禮後送了一枝花安慰他的人。華萊士求學有成後回來向他求婚。因為當時貴族享有初夜權的原因，他們在森林裡偷偷的結婚了，這里可以體現出他的一種反抗的精神，一種本能的叛逆。但他們的愛情沒有維系多久，因為梅倫的美麗太耀眼了，貴族殺了梅倫，這是蘇格蘭和英格蘭的戰斗的導火線，因為這引發了華萊士的爆發，揭竿而起，各地響應。第二段是與皇後的感情。皇後丈夫本來就是個同性戀，包辦的婚姻讓她感覺不到愛情的存在，根本沒有感情可言。缺乏了愛情的滋潤，讓為愛情而起的華萊士走進了她的心靈，她自然為華萊士的豪情傾倒了。而華萊士則是在為了自由而奮身博殺，因為失去了梅倫，他一直在為了他的信念作戰，皇後的美麗和善良感動了他，兩顆乾枯的心就這樣融在了一起。
再說說他的戰斗，華萊士開始戰斗的時候，是因為貴族殺了他的妻子梅倫，可以說是一個簡單的復仇行動，但事情一開始就不能再受到控制的，尤其是領導權掌握在一個聰明人的手裡。後來，他們起義得到了各地不斷的支持，這讓人看到了蘇格蘭的自由希望。一個方面是因為他們蘇格蘭的人受迫壓太久了，再加上華萊士所學的智慧，他們勢如破竹，這就很讓人，特別是愛德華心慌了。想盡辦法招安華萊士，最後還是利用了一個騙局把華萊士抓了。
最後，在砍頭台。這里是這部片的一個精華了，思想就是在這里的。行刑前，兩個小丑在那裡舞盡丑態，讓人發笑，但也是說明了英國人的行為恰恰就是兩個小丑所為。華萊士就刑，行人對這位英雄扔雞蛋、爛菜，恰恰說明了國民的麻木和愚昧。後來在刑台上，華萊士受盡了各樣殘酷的折磨，下面則是一片歡呼聲。華萊士就刑前，看到那個小孩在笑，可能這里也是一個希望的延續，把希望寄託給了後人。那聲振饋發聾的「freedom」讓人久久不能放下思想，激人不斷前進。可以說，在刑台這段，是鮮明的對比讓這個自由的精神體現的淋漓盡致的。一邊是鬥士、英雄，一邊是愚昧的國民;一邊是前進中的先鋒，一邊是止步不前的落伍者。差距就在這里體現了，代溝在這里產生。
勇敢的心是震撼人心的，因為這里有可貴的思想——自由。沒有自由了你們還能幹什麼?也許是真的，我們也該好好思量思量。
望採納！~~
Ⅶ 誰能用英文介紹下電影《勇敢的心》
《Braveheart》（勇敢的心）
（下面是劇情介紹，我不寫觀後感）In the middle ages around thirteenth Century, King England" legs" Edward I ruled Scotland for Scotland, as he forced a group of Scotland people against the tyranny of the uprising, result of a young William Wallace lost his father and brother, he is in after the funeral by his uncle and adopted, and as uncle left hometown.
Years later, Wallace alt returned to his hometown of Scotland at this time, still in Edward's cruel tyrant legs under the rule of. The Wallace home is hoping to calm day, farmers living, family, parenthood, and he said of boys and girls Mo Lun ( Murron ) the development of love, and in order to escape the king gave England nobles enjoy female virginity rights unequal treatment, in a secret wedding day night. The next day, Mo Lun was British soldiers and rebel, the local governor to lead Wallace appeared and killed her, who was bereaved of his beloved wife Wallace rose up, and other Scotland people are responding to his wife, Wallace finally killed the chief way revenge.
Soon, Wallace and the villagers formed the uprising army, and have recruited in response to the righteous. They first entered the nobles of England castle, and the castle burned. Along with Wallace's deeds spread, more and more people respond to revolt, and Wallace's army also carry all before one, has won several battles, including the battle of stringer bridge break infantry conquer cavalry superstition and captured England city York city. King Edward I, aware of the seriousness of the situation, personally led a stronger army against Wallace, both in terms of Foucault ( Falkirk ) in battle, however Wallace has been united Scotland noble betrayed, at the battle of Foucault.
In Foucault the battle failed, Wallace began taking hide guerrilla tactics against the British, and the betrayal of the two Scotland noble act of revenge. At the same time, King Edward's wife Princess Isabella was sent as envoy met with Wallace on many occasions to assist, Princess Wallace resistance risk, but also the development of a relationship between two people, the princess even pregnant with Wallace. Subsequently, Scotland noble requirements met with Wallace, Wallace believes Robert Bruce so aristocratic leaders meeting alone, but only to be the father of Bruce and other nobles betrayed, Wallace was captured, and Bruce also officially and father break.
Wallace received the England administration official trials, as long as Wallace admitted treason could be mitigated punishment, but not from Wallace, claims that he never committed to long leg Edward. In a London trial on the square, Wallace suffered various torture still refused to surrender, and even London people have been moved by the courage of Wallace, have cried out the presiding judge for mercy. Wallace uses only the last breath shouted:" free!" ( Freedom! ). In before decapitation, he also trance to see his wife in the crowd to smile at him, and then, in Wallace's hands clenched tokens also loose.
William Wallace was beheaded by his courage, the impact of the Scotland aristocrat Robert Bruce once again led the Wallace men against England, this time they cry out the name of Wallace, and in the end won eagerly looked forward to for a long time free.
希望我的回答可以幫到你（·-·）
Ⅷ 勇敢的心英文觀後感
[勇敢的心英文觀後感]Let us recall again the side to see the long process of history, how to create heroes, you will find from our own side, a life .There is a direct their shadow. First, the inheritance of childhood Wallace is not natural endowment from the hero, at best, is the future generations of civilians, although his father had led a The small protest, as compared to his later, many of immature, unsuccessful factor. His father was then the representative of the civilian population, he uprising, power lies not in its own class on free awareness and evaluation. Some Sense, he is in the conspiracy of hate and who are loyal to the feudal lords of the country against the conviction, not even defeat Opponents of intent, only to let him know that tyrant, civilians also have the courage to fight. England foot-long expansion annexation to the Scottish territorial ambitions, cloth snared all participants in the peace negotiation of the assassination of the Scottish your People, young retainers were not spared. With tears in his eyes. He finally knows what death is, it is meant losing familiar with the cordial, no longer has sufficient warmth. The film, his uncle put on his chin, said the sentence: "You truth your mother." The meaning of this statement is not as simple as literally, is only the appearance he sighs, only the sense of loneliness and fear Steep The Wallace declare: We are a, you still have to rely on close relatives.It was at that time Wallace explanation: He is one of the sentimental and weak heart.His uncle was a wise man, his brother died more than understanding the purpose and significance of protest. He has to learn Latin Wallace, Tell Wallace, learn how to use weapons, must first learn how to use the brain is more important to God through Latin understand where -- The truth was given to the people free. Young Wallace, of course, not completely understand this, he also constantly immersed in the native land of lost loved ones and seek grief Lane. In the dream his father and dialogue, his father said to him: "Heart is not detention, have the courage to pursue!" This undoubtedly is Health The earliest meaning of life Enlightenment. Wallace\'s uncle with his travels in Europe, he grew up in the maturity only after it will inherit from two ancestors on the Po Your legacy: good sense and courage, with his search for life from the free.Second, the aspirations of lifeOthers audience to participate in the wedding and let him do not realize that, in his country under the rule of the transient beauty, never impossible Emerging from the shadow of torn. No girl could escape long legs invention of the power with the intention of attracting domestic and nobles in Scotland reassuring presence on the land development. Such a person may be deprived of Road privileges, no doubt makes a deeper civilians heavy oppression. White bride no time to put her husband\'s embrace, it was rushed to the suppression of the British aristocracy. The groom in anger in the anti-intent Anti immediately by the sword on the neck-coercive. Bride inner scales choose his life, it Fukai swords hand, The ears of language, the wife finally let the vicious power by force, was forced to enre the pain of killing beloved cutter cut. At such times, the personal anger and resistance are so insignificant.
Ⅸ 電影勇敢的心，英文觀後感
I
remember seeing this movie for the first time in late 2003, and I was
impressed. I saw it again last night, and I was even more impressed. The
acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant. For me, all my guesses
were incorrect. Everything that happens in this movie in unpredicted.
The last half hour itself was highly unpredictable, and it had a
powerful message. When a scene was meant to be dramatic, they did a
great job at it. I don't know about everybody else, but the ending did
make me cry. The message the movie sent kept me thinking for a while.
The amount of courage and bravery was inconceivable, there was barely
any faults or anything wrong with the movie. For a movie of 1995, they
did a great job.
I absolutely guarantee this movie to anybody who
enjoys action and war with a bit of drama mixed in. One of the best, or
maybe even the best movie of the 20th century.
19 November 2005 | by Sheldon Eyzenga
(Canada)
Ⅹ 求《勇敢的心》英文觀後感
Fighting? What's fighting?!What for? Every man in the world may go to fight,for peace,for freedom,or just for rage. These days I watched some excellent movies which received many awards in their times. Yesterday,I just finished watching Brave Heart.The excellent movie did gain tremendous achievements in those days .For instance,it was awarded Best Cinematography,Best Director,Best Effects, Sound Effects Editing,Best Makeup,Best Picture in Oscar (奧斯卡最佳影片、最佳導演、最佳攝影、最佳音樂、最佳化裝五項大獎) and so on. The acting is amazing, and the ending was brilliant.Everything that happens in this movie is unpredicted,such as Murron's death,William's participation in the battle,the reneging of Robert which caused by his father actually,and so on. The amount of courage and bravery was inconceivable.I do respect for those heroes's courage very much.However, I was shocked by their unjustice death.They did not deserve so miserable a way of dying!! I hate Robert's father.The old man is really rascal! He broke his son's promise to William not only once,and it's he who brought William to death! Fortunately,the young leader,Robert the Bruce,was able to lead the fight for the scots freedom at last.Thanks for his bravery and justice. In addition,I respect the courage of other captains as well,such as Hamish.They fight for their sire,their grate William Wallace,the macaulish! Furthermore,when Iooked deep into their eyes, it remind me of the fight between Naruto and carra.I was surprised to find the same meaning in the eyes of these brave fighters! I admire them! I am so aflame in my heart after watching the movie that I hardly calm down,let alone to go to sleep... Brave Heart,as valiant as heroes! I will treasure the precious movies up.