① 經典電影《人工智慧》插曲 For Always 中文歌詞
For Always
Lara:
I close my eyes 我閉上眼
And there in the shadows I see your light 朦朧中我看到了你帶來的光明
You come to me out of my dreams across
The night 你穿越黑夜從夢境中向我走來
Josh:
You take my hand 你抓住我的手
Though you may be so many stars away 雖然你遠在天邊
I know that our spirits and souls are one 我知道我們的精神和靈魂已合二為一
Lara:
We've circled the moon and we've touched the sun 我們繞著月亮來到了太陽身邊
Both:
So here we'll stay 我們在此停留
For always 一直這樣
Forever 直到永遠
Beyond here and on to eternity 飛越這里直至永恆
For always 一直這樣
Forever 直到永遠
For us there's no time and no space 對我們而言 沒有時間和空間的概念
Josh:
No barrier love won't erase 愛可以跨越一切障礙
Lara:
Wherever you go 不管你身在何方
I still know in my heart you'll be here 我依然知道你的心與我同在
Both:
With me 和我一起
Josh:
From this day on (day on) 從今天起
I'm certain that I'll never be alone 我確信我不再孤獨
Lara:
I know what my heart must have always known 我知道我心所想
(known what my heart must have known)
Both:
That love has a power that's all its own 愛有種獨特的力量
And for always 一直會有
Forever 直到永遠
Now we can fly 現在我們可以飛翔
And for always 一直得飛啊
and always 飛啊
Lara:
We will go on (we will go on) 我們將繼續
Both:
Beyond goodbye 告別孤單
Lara:
For Always 一直這樣
Josh:
Forever 直到永遠
Lara:
Beyond here and on to eternity 飛越這里直至永恆
Josh:
For Always 一直這樣
Lara:
And ever 直到永遠
Both:
You'll be a part (you'll be apart) of me 你是我的一部分
Both:
And for always 一直這樣
Forever 直到永遠
A thousand tomorrows may cross the sky 一千個明天跨越了天際
And for always 一直這樣
And always 一直這樣
We will go on (we will go on) beyond goodbye 我們將繼續 不再孤單
② 求電影:我,機器人(英文)的十句經典的話
Detective Del Spooner: What if I'm right?
戴爾·史普納警探：如果我說對了會怎樣？
Lt. John Bergin: [sighs] Well, then I guess we're gonna miss the good old days.
約翰·伯金少尉：【嘆息】那，我想我們會開始懷念過去那些好日子了。
Detective Del Spooner: What good old days?
戴爾·史普納警探：什麼好日子？
Lt. John Bergin: When people were killed by *other people*.
約翰·伯金少尉：那時候人還是被"其他人"殺死的。
________________________________________
Detective Del Spooner: Human beings have dreams. Even dogs have dreams, but not you, you are just a machine. An imitation of
life. Can a robot write a symphony? Can a robot turn a... canvas into a beautiful masterpiece?
戴爾·史普納警探：人類有夢想，甚至狗都有夢想，但你沒有，你只是個機器，一個冒充生命的贗品。一個機器人能寫交響樂么？一個機器人
能把一個，嗯，帆布變成一幅美麗的傑作么？
Sonny: Can *you*?
桑尼："你"能么？
________________________________________
Detective Del Spooner: I think you murdered him because he was teaching you to simulate emotions and things got out of
control.
戴爾·史普納警探：我認為是你殺了他，因為當時他正在訓練你模擬感情，然後事情就失去了控制。
Sonny: I did not murder him.
桑尼：我真的沒殺他。
Detective Del Spooner: But emotions don't seem like a very useful simulation for a robot.
戴爾·史普納警探：但是對一個機器人來說，感情不像是個有用的模擬物品。
Sonny: [getting angry] I did not murder him.
桑尼：【開始生氣了】我真的沒殺他。
Detective Del Spooner: Hell, I don't want my toaster or my vacuum cleaner appearing emotional...
戴爾·史普納警探：該死，我可不想讓我的烤箱或者吸塵器顯得充滿感情……
Sonny: [Hitting table with his fists] I did not murder him!
桑尼：【用拳頭敲桌子】我真的沒殺他！
Detective Del Spooner: [as Sonny observes the inflicted damage to the interrogation table]
That one's called anger. Ever simulate anger before?
戴爾·史普納警探：【當桑尼在觀察審問桌的破壞情況時】這就叫"憤怒"，以前模仿過"憤怒"沒有？
________________________________________
Detective Del Spooner: [Entering Calvin's office room] In the lab, before Sonny jumped us...
戴爾·史普納警探：【進入加爾文的辦公室】在這個實驗室，在桑尼從我們這兒跑開以前……
Susan Calvin: [Interrupts] Sonny?
蘇珊.加爾文：【打斷他】桑尼？
Detective Del Spooner: The robot.
戴爾·史普納警探：那個機器人。
Susan Calvin: You're calling the robot Sonny?
蘇珊.加爾文：你叫那個機器人桑尼？
Detective Del Spooner: No, it did. The robot did. I didn't care, the robot said it was Sonny. In the lab, there was a cott.
I'm asking you, did you see the cott?
戴爾·史普納警探：不，它叫的。那個機器人叫的。我才不管呢，那個機器人說它是桑尼。這實驗室原來有個床。我在問你那，你原來有沒有
見過那個床？
Susan Calvin: I slept in my office.
蘇珊.加爾文：我睡在自己的辦公室。
________________________________________
Sonny: [Looking around at the robots while he is about to be "killed"] They all look like me. But none of them are me.
桑尼：【環視周圍的機器人，他馬上要被"處死"了】他們看起來都像我，但是沒有一個是我。
Susan Calvin: That's right. You are unique.
蘇珊.加爾文：是，你是獨一無二的。
Sonny: [pause] Will it hurt?
桑尼：【停頓】會疼么？
③ 急需電影《人工智慧》和《勇敢的心》的英文劇情介紹
勇敢的心 braveheart
資料一：
Unfortunately, I have yet to find a film of quite this caliber again. Braveheart contains elements of Romance (several heart- wrenching and warming instances), Epic/Action (spectacular scenes), Mystery (can take a few viewings to put it all together), History (albeit romanticised) and of course Drama (perfectly unravelled). This level of uncompromised multi-tasking allows the film to move you to laugh and cry, love and hate or even to think and be taught. I'm trying to avoid the clichés of glowing reviews (almost as bad as entirely negative ones) - but this is one of the few movies that I feel deserves one.
The witty banter between friends/foes/lovers/relatives is, in my opinion, flawless and aids the film's claim as a true classic. The soundtrack is similarly top-notch and encapsulates and refracts the patriotic theme ring several key moments. The political sub-plot and gorgeous scenery also serve as refreshers ring otherwise heavy areas of the story. Perhaps Braveheart's only flaw (but if you share my sentiments it's actually a bonus) is its length so you'll want to prepare a comfy seat and maybe even two pots of tea (complete with cosies!).
I suppose it's also relevant to touch on the historic inaccuracies as I expect this is what people might dislike most about this film. However, "History is written by those who have hanged heroes"; also, the overall sketchiness of such periods coupled with the right of artistic license are enough for me to personally dismiss such thoughts. On that note, I hope you also enjoy what, to me, is the greatest film created (so far).
資料二：
The movie begins in the small town of Elerslie, Scotland. William lives with his father, who is not named in the film, and his older brother Malcolm. William's father and older brother are called to a meeting a few miles from their home where they find the entire nobility of Scotland hanging. Malcolm and his father then go to a battle between the British and their clan, both die tragically. At the funeral William meets his uncle Argyle who fought in the battle with Malcolm and his father. He takes him away to live with him. The scene then cuts to an alt William on his horse. William later runs into a girl he knew before he went to live with Argyle, her name, Murron, we discover that Lords have the right to sleep with brides on their wedding night, so William marries Murron in secret. Murron is the assaulted by a British guard, the guard is killed by William, a fight ensues, and eventually Murron is killed by the lord. This enrages Wallace who then build himself a fine army entering city's and killing all Englishman within. Wallace prepares to move on to Sterling where he prepared for his greatest battle yet, in the forest he realises that he must find a way to beat the heavy cavalry from the ground, he decided to create spears twice as long as men. These were used in the battle to kill the entire heavy cavalry raised at the last minute to kill the on coming horses. Eventually Wallace reaches York, the most important military city he gains control. Williams final battle at Falkirk ends in his betrayal by two nobles, whom he later kills. William is betrayed by the leper father of Robert the Bruce, is captured and refuses to bow down as a loyal subject of the king Edward I, Longshanks. Therefore, instead of mere beheading William Wallace is subject to being Hung, hung within an inch of death. Drawn, being stretched by his ankles and wrists and then having his insides shown to him before he died. Then Quartered, he was beheaded and his head was put on the London Bridge his body was torn into for pieces one sent to each corner of Britain as a warning to the citizens. After Wallace's death we see Robert the Bruce led the battle of Bannockburn the last battle for Scotland's freedom.
資料三：
In 14th Century Scotland, William Wallace leads his people in a rebellion against the tyranny of the English King, who has given English nobility the 'Prima Nocta'.. a right to take all new brides for the first night. The Scots are none too pleased with the brutal English invaders, but they lack leadership to fight back. Wallace creates a legend of himself, with his courageous defence of his people and attacks on the English.
——————————————————————
人工智慧 artificial intelligence A.I
資料一：
In the not-so-far future the polar ice caps have melted and the resulting raise of the ocean waters has drowned all the coastal cities of the world. Withdrawn to the interior of the continents, the human race keeps advancing, reaching to the point of creating realistic robots (called mechas) to serve him. One of the mecha-procing companies builds David, an artificial kid which is the first to have real feelings, especially a never-ending love for his "mother", Monica. Monica is the woman who adopted him as a substitute for her real son, who remains in cryo-stasis, stricken by an incurable disease. David is living happily with Monica and her husband, but when their real son returns home after a cure is discovered, his life changes dramatically. A futuristic adaptation of the tale of Pinocchio, with David being the "fake" boy who desperately wants to become "real".
資料二：
The "literalists" are clearly not happy with A.I. So now is a good time to recall that "2001: A Space Odyssey" was greeted upon release with derision, confusion, dismissive reviews, public consternation, and, oh yeah, some thought it was an absolute masterpiece. Beyond the monolithic influence of that film (think of Han Solo's jump to lightspeed, etc.), the symbols of "2001" -- TO THIS VERY DAY -- cannot be decoded using anything but the most personal, interpretive language. The obelisks, the message of the obelisks, the Star Child, Cosmonaut Dave's "room", HAL-9000's true motivation – all these things remain in our collective subconscious as indelible images that refuse to be concretely defined between or among viewers. WHAT CAUSES THIS CONFLICT OF PERCEPTION? IS IT INTENTIONAL? Again and again, Kubrick's films take us to a No-Man's Land of narrative and moral ambiguity, stranding us, forcing us to make decisions, demanding interpretation (or we can judge the surface, walk away, hate the film). To my perception, Kubrick is the only, true "Brechtian" film director. The device Brecht proposed is "Alienation Effect", or put simply, Leading the audience down two, divergent paths at once. My favorite example is "Barry Lyndon". Being the adventures of a young man, handsome, virtuous, well-meaning, ambitious, full of promise. Yet in every scene, the camera "pulls-back" revealing Barry (but never to himself) to be womanizing, self-absorbed, criminally inclined, socially inept, not very bright, morally bankrupt, and at last, a broken shell of a man. Or let's consider "Strangelove": Did Kubrick really create a headbanger, slapstick comedy about nuclear proliferation, mass destruction, and military/political incompetence? The real question is "Who else could have?" Well, that's my take on Kubrick's artistic sensibility, and, without daring to presume Spielberg's motivation, it's what drew them both to "A.I." Pinocchio, the Blue Fairy, cuddly Teddy Bears on one hand, but on the other hand – social institutions are faltering forever -- parenthood, childhood, science, instry, sexuality -- all distorted beyond repair. And Humans, the ultimate A.I. protagonist, seem blissed-out, in denial, more interested in creating "Davids", "Darlenes" and "Gigolo Joes" than in rising water levels and the imminent threat of extinction. Therefore, I believe A.I. is getting precisely the response all Kubrick films "INITIALLY" get. Spielberg's reputation and career can withstand anything that public perception might bring to his films, but I keep thinking that A.I. is the riskiest moment of his artistic life.
④ 跪求~~!關於機器人的電影的英文簡介
Bicentennial Man
Rating:
Genre: Comedy
Movie Type: Domestic Comedy， Sci-Fi Comedy
Themes: Journey of Self-Discovery， Opposites Attract， Robots and Androids
Director: Chris Columbus
Main Cast: Robin Williams， Sam Neill， Wendy Crewson， Embeth Davidtz， Oliver Platt
Release Year: 1999
Country: US
Run Time: 131 minutes
MPAA Rating: PG
Plot
If a robot spends enough time around humans， can he learn to become one of them？ The Martin family purchases a domestic android as a servant and names him Andrew (Robin Williams). Andrew comes to know the man of the house as Sir (Sam Neill)， his wife as Ma'am Wendy Crewson， and their daughter as Portia (Embeth Davidtz)； before long， the Martins suspect that they do not have an ordinary robot on their hands. Andrew seems capable of expressing emotion and generating original thoughts， and the longer he stays with the Martins， the more strongly these human traits manifest themselves. Over the next 200 years， Andrew becomes less a machine and more a member of the family， until a mechanic (Oliver Platt) tells Andrew that he might be able to turn him into a human being. Based on a short story by renowned science fiction author Isaac Asimov (surprisingly， it's only the second Asimov story to be brought to the screen)， Bicentennial Man was directed by Chris Columbus， who previously worked with Robin Williams on Mrs. Doubtfire. ~ Mark Deming， All Movie Guide.
機器管家/變人 Bicentennial Man (1999)
導 演:克里斯·哥倫布 Chris Columbus
主 演:羅賓·威廉斯 Robin Williams 山姆·內爾 Sam Neill 艾伯斯·戴維斯 Embeth Davidtz 奧利弗·普萊特 Oliver Platt 海麗·凱特·艾森伯格 Hallie Kate Eisenberg Kevin Tiny Ancell Joe Bellan Merridee Book
上 映:1999年12月13日 ( 美國 )更多地區
地 區:美國 德國 ( 拍攝地 )
對 白:英語
評 分:6.1/10( 7330票 ) 詳細
顏 色:彩色
聲 音:DTS Dolby Digital SDDS
時 長:132 分鍾
類 型:劇情 科幻 愛情
分 級:瑞典:Btl 澳大利亞:PG 英國:PG 阿根廷:13 德國:0 美國:PG 紐西蘭:PG 法國:U
劇情簡介:
這部影片追隨一個機器人的「生活」進行。羅賓·威廉姆斯飾演的機器人安德魯被馬丁一家作為家務機器人購買，他的程序只設置為完成僕人的任務。但沒過幾天他們發現安德魯並不是一個尋常的機器人，因為他開始體驗情感和創造思維。在一個跨越了兩百年的故事裡，安德魯在阻止那些製造他的人銷毀自己的過程中領會了人性的錯綜復雜。
這個機器人，是好萊塢喜劇天王、羅賓威廉斯最新的嘗試。 擅長以溫馨喜感演出取勝的、好萊塢影星，羅賓威廉斯，在新片《機器人》中，飾演的機器人，在經歷兩百年後，終於透過先進科技，變成真正人類的故事。
片中雖然大量使用電腦科技，強化視覺效果，不過影片的賣點，還是集中在人性情感的探討上。羅賓威廉斯在影片中，將再度以感性的內心戲打動觀眾。羅賓威廉斯表示科幻片向來是他喜歡的.
PS:中文介紹並非原英文介紹翻譯。