它是一部愛國電影英文

⑴ 幾個關於愛國的電影用英語怎麼說

正確翻譯為：several films about patriotism
如果用several patriotic films，則容易被誤解成「電影本身是愛國的」，不妥。

⑵ 愛國電影觀後感 700字

愛國電影《南京！南京！》觀後感
1937年12月的南京，應該是絕大部分國人心口永遠的痛。而記錄這段痛的電影雖然不少卻乏善可陳。38歲的陸川，用他的方式詮釋了這段註定歷百年也難忘的痛。
出於對《可可西里》的欣賞，也出於對《新周刊》相關介紹篇幅的好奇，我沒有選擇購買DVD版的《南京！南京！》而是走進了久違的電影院。
一開始出現的那座城牆輕輕的雷了我一下。做為中國四大古都之一的南京的城牆，即便在太平天國時代，也沒那麼潦倒吧。
緊接下來的鏡頭則很有些主旋律的味道，大批身著國軍標准制服的殘兵欲從城門出逃，部分決意死守的身著類似八路軍灰布軍服的士兵執意不願放行，想離開者一臉無奈，要阻攔者滿腹心酸。
當高舉民族大義旗幟，力主死守聲稱要與首都共存亡的最高軍事長官棄城而去。我無法責怪那些不知所措的吶喊著「當官的都跑了，放我們出去！」的軍官和士兵。那一剎，國家和民族對他們而言或許已經只是一個抽象的概念。當由想離開的軍人組成的方陣和由執意不願放行的軍人組成的方陣開始互相用血肉之軀進行碰撞的時候，我想起了康洪雷作品《我的團長我的團》中虞嘯卿的那句台詞：「仗打到這份上，中國軍人再無無辜之人！」
耳邊傳來陣陣密集的槍聲，已經絕望的戰俘知道那是日軍正在有計劃有組織的屠殺自己的同袍同胞，不願再邁步走向死亡的刑場，槍聲響起，一個個麻木的被捆住雙手的軀體倒下。憤怒、失望和羞恥讓陸劍雄這個戰士無話可說，他不願坐著死去，為了保留作為一名軍人面對死亡時的最後一點尊嚴，他選擇了沉默著邁步走向刑場。身後，小豆子跟上去了，還活著的人們也跟上去了，當絕望的軍人們高喊著「中國不會亡」的口號紛紛倒下，陸劍雄一語不發，死不瞑目。
劉燁用很少的台詞和極精練的肢體語言把這個純爺們的角色演得很到位。個人覺得基本沒什麼可挑剔的。
日軍一個小隊推開教堂的大門，恐懼情緒在人數上百倍於日軍的人群中蔓延開來，不分男女不論老少都對著僅只一個小隊的日軍士兵高高舉起了屈辱的雙手。這一刻，什麼國家，什麼民族，什麼尊嚴，在人群的心中盪然無存。有的只是對死亡的恐懼。而日軍士兵內心的恐懼也不亞於他們所面對的人群，高度緊張下的角川正雄滿懷恐懼的對著懺悔室的門連開數槍後破門而出的卻是幾具女性屍體。透過屏幕，可以感受到那一刻作為一個人的角川內心的震撼、懺悔、掙扎。
作為一個日籍演員的中泉英雄能頂著日本右翼勢力的壓力和唾罵以一種正視歷史、揭露日軍罪行的心態來演繹角川正雄這樣一個角色，個人覺得真的很不容易。至少我本人很佩服。
當難民營中要求所有女性都要把頭發剪掉，換上男人的衣服時。妓女小江卻不願意剪掉自己的頭發，還說「仗打完後還要靠它吃飯」呢。此時妓女小江給人的感覺完全就是一副商女不知亡國恨的樣子。而當日軍向難民營要100名女性去充當慰安婦，姜老師泣不成聲的解釋說如果這樣做了可以為難民營換回需要的糧食、菜蔬和過冬的煤，不這樣做日軍將摧毀難民營時，還是這個風塵女子小江在長時間的沉寂後第一個舉起了手。在被帶走的時候，小江轉過頭來看姜老師，眼中滿含著淚水但同時也充滿了驕傲。她用一種我不入地獄誰入地獄的方式證明了自己的尊嚴，盡其所能的保護了那些曾經用充滿鄙夷的眼光打量她的同胞。
江一燕，這個年輕的八零後，把妓女小江這個中國版的「羊脂球」演繹得可謂淋漓盡致。贊一個先。
唐先生，那個膽小怕事、性格懦弱的唐先生，他一心想保全他的家人，甚至不惜為此去充當告密者。但當他失去了他願意為之付出一切努力去保護的家人後，面對那座已經淪為地獄的城市，在有機會可以走出南京的時候，他選擇了留下面對死亡，讓一個假扮成拉貝助手的軍官把自己懷孕的老婆帶出了城。他選擇了坦然的面對死亡來為自己之前做錯的事贖罪，臨刑前夕，他不無驕傲的告訴那個日軍大佐：「我的妻子懷孕了，我的妻子懷孕了」。槍聲響起的瞬間，他以死亡為代價找回了自己的尊嚴。
在走進影院之前我一直在懷疑范偉是否適合這樣一個角色。而當我走出影院的時候我已經完全相信范偉不僅僅只是個喜劇明星。
姜淑雲，這個難民營的一直的守護天使，當拉貝不得不奉召回國後，她用柔弱的肩膀擔起拉貝留下的擔子。當她冒著巨大的危險一次次的去以妻子的名義認領那些不是自己丈夫的丈夫而被日軍識破並抓住她准備帶走的那一刻。她向只有數面之緣的懂英語的角川說了一句：「Killme！」（殺了我）。那一刻，我原諒了她曾經的懦弱，原諒了她在日軍向難民營索要100名女性去做慰安婦時她不曾舉手的退縮。
姜淑雲知道她被抓去所面臨的命運：被強奸。為了能夠死得稍微有點尊嚴，所以她向只見過數面的懂英語日本軍人角川求助。最後，角川幫助她實現了這個願望，她終於可以有尊嚴的死去。這是個很好但也很有破綻的橋段，當時押解他的兩個日本士兵分別是一左一右的扭住她的胳膊在同一水平線上向前走的，而角川在聽到姜老師的那句話後經過短暫的思索，掏出手槍就是一槍爆頭。須知角川並非神槍手或者狙擊手啊，他就不怕打到他的戰友嗎？並且他的上級在他開槍後並未做出任何異議。這實在是有些說不過去的。
有人說高圓圓的表演痕跡過於明顯了，但我沒這種感覺。我只覺得陸川的確很會挑演員，仔細想來，氣質比高圓圓更純凈的角兒在當今的演藝圈也實在是為數不多。
小豆子在這部黑白影片中幾乎經歷了所有事件。影片結束，屏幕上打出「小豆子，還活著」。影片中的小豆子和現實中的小豆子們對那段歷史的回憶必將永遠的將日本軍國主義釘在恥辱柱上。
與被網路熱炒的奧運童星林妙可相比較，我更喜歡這部電影中的那個見證和承載了那段歷史的小豆子！
這部電影還有個英文名字：《City of Life and Death》，「生死之城」的意思。相比之下，我更喜歡這個名字。畢竟，這是一部商業電影，而不是一部記錄片。我也希望看完這個帖子後有可能對我破口大罵的同學們先抱著一種看電影的心態再看一遍這部影片再來罵。
陸川38歲了，不算年輕了，但畢竟比斯皮爾伯格還是年輕了點。所以不指望《南京！南京！》能達到《辛德勒的名單》的高度。
一千多萬美元的投資對於國產電影來說不算少了，但相比《辛德勒的名單》的投資，還是少了點。也正因為如此，我理解了《南京！南京！》中雷人的城牆和那反復重復出現的背景。

⑶ 電影愛國者英文簡介

The movie takes place in South Carolina in 1776. Benjamin Martin, a French-Indian war hero who is haunted by his past, is a patriot who wants no part in a war with Britian. Meanwhile, his two eldest sons, Gabriel and Thomas, can't wait to go out and kill some Redcoats. When South Carolina decides to go to war with Britain, Gabriel immediatly signs up to fight...without his father's permission. But soon, Colonel Tavington, British solder infamous for his brutal tactiks, captures Gabriel and sentences him to be hanged. As Gabriel is taken away, Thomas tries to free him, only to be killed by Tavington, in front of Benjamin. Now, seeking revenge for his son's death, Benjamin leaves behind his 5 other children to bring independence to the 13 colonies.


Benjamin Martin is a South Carolina planter who is still haunted by his notoriously brutal past as a soldier in the French and Indian War. When the American Revolution comes, he chooses not to fight for the Continental Army because he wants to protect his family. But when the British Colonel Tavington threatens their welfare and kills one of his sons, he chooses to enlist. Martin becomes the leader of a makeshift militia, which consists of peasants, slaves, a minister, and assorted other irregulars. During the war Martin and his men discover that they will pay a steep personal price for their rebellion. But thanks to their courage and bravery, they are also destined to pay a pivotal role in turning the tide against the Redcoats.

兩種都是,請挑選.

⑷ 它就像是看一部電影。 英文翻譯

It just see a film. just是僅僅的意思，It just see a film則翻譯為只是看電影。。

⑸ 電影愛國者的英文觀後感

THE PATRIOT Roland Emmerich, USA, 2000

Mel Gibson is a movie star. A really big one, even. He's got charisma and presence and lights up the screen and is pleasingly handsome in a rugged, non-pretty-boy kind of way. He's funny and charming on talkshows and makes lots of money for all of the above. This much we know. What remains a bit of a mystery is how he maintains such status. His star-power is firmly rooted in the seemingly ancient Lethal Weapon series and the quip-throwing, fast drawing, scene-chewing character he plays in it seems to have overtaken his public persona as well. Does anyone actually know anyone who even saw Lethal Weapon 4? The more appropriate question perhaps being: does anybody remember it? Does anybody care?

Since Mel Gibson is a movie star by trade, he is also tangentially an actor. And in his new film, The Patriot, he has a listless taciturnity that one could diplomatically describe as "understated" or, if so inclined, "Gary Cooper-ish." Ultimately, though, Gibson's performance just seems false -- hollow in an utterly competent, completely professional way. In the age of Jim Carrey and Fight Club, Being John Malkovich and Ben Stiller, Gibson's style of acting doesn't seem so much old school as plain inadequate. This is not to run roughshod over classical notions of subtlety or interiority, but merely to say that if he was once emblematic of his time, Gibson's moment has passed. Perhaps he is simply inching towards some exclusive hideaway of insignificance, where he can commiserate over the rising price of jet fuel with Kevin Costner and Harrison Ford.

It's not all his fault, either, The Patriot. And it's not even that it's a bad movie, it's just not good either; it just is. Created by the director/procer team of Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin, The Patriot is caught in the double bind of wanting to be two semi-incompatible things at once. On the one hand, the project has the air of an important, high-style heritage picture about a simple farmer trying to escape his past sins and keep his family together ring trying times. But set against the backdrop of the Revolutionary War, the movie continually feels an alternate pull towards being a blood-and-guts actioner. Over the course of its 2 1/2 hours, the film often seems at war with itself -- every time it starts to move with a steady flow, building momentum, it suddenly finds itself in a little narrative eddy, taking time out for a funeral, or a wedding, or to reiterate how bad the bad guys are (as in not good) and how the good guys are simple folk just trying to get along and colonially do their thing.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1069/is_4_36/ai_63973804

這里還有
http://www.popmatters.com/film/reviews/p/patriot.shtml

http://www.splicedonline.com/00reviews/patriot.html

http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/p/patriot.html

這個是別人的答案，拿過來借花獻佛了……

⑹ 問題:跪求幾部具有教育意義的英語電影，特別是愛國、搞笑的！！急！

《辛德勒的名單》《當幸福來敲門》《八月迷情》 《忠犬八公》
《返老還童》又名：本傑明·巴頓奇事 《遺願清單》
《阿甘正傳》《綠里奇跡》《海上鋼琴師》《重返十七歲》
這些都是非常有教育意義的
希望樓主喜歡
望採納~~~~~~

⑺ 《長津湖》是愛國電影嗎

是。

《長津湖》是一部在壯烈犧牲層面上、演繹了愛國主義激情的影片作品。志願軍的犧牲，是我們不願意看到的，同時又是讓我們崇敬與稱贊的行為。因為，他們換來了我們今天的和平歲月與山河無恙。

抗戰電影《長津湖》是一部富含愛國主義激情的影視作品。它猶如一首洋溢著愛國主義激情的頌歌那般，走進觀眾的內心深處、久久回響。整部電影以信念堅定、壯烈犧牲以及扭轉局面等場景，為觀眾送去了濃烈的愛國主義情愫。它，是一部傳遞了愛國主義精神的佳作影片。

人物介紹：

1、伍千里

七連連長，編號162，哥哥伍百里的陣亡，是他內心最大的傷痛。伍千里經歷過無數戰斗以及生死考驗。他是一個連長，更像一個兄長，要照顧整個連里的157名戰士。

2、伍萬里

七連新兵，編號677。他叛逆倔強，嫉惡如仇。從一開始完全不會打槍，甚至有幾分混不吝的農村孩子，到成長為一個時刻緊握著鋼槍的戰斗英雄。

⑻ 寫一篇介紹電影的英語作文

寫作思路：從文章的寫作目的、中心主旨入手，以使文章中心思想鮮明、深刻地表現出來。

正文：

Going to the movie is an affair of recreation， I like in the movie theater to go to the movie， because movie theater in of that kind of the atmosphere is what home can＇t own

看電影是一件消遣的事情，我喜歡在電影院里去看電影，因為電影院里的那種氛圍是家裡不能擁有的。

but the condition of now， we usually will go to the movie in the home， few go to movie theater

但是現在的情況，我們通常會在家裡看電影，很少有人去電影院。

usually see foreign movie at ordinary times， the really local movie still has a certain margin， the movie of now comes close the modern living method more， the thinking of now

平時通常看外國電影，真正的本土電影還有一定的差距，現在的電影更接近現代生活方式，現在的思考。

classic movie many meeting bodies now traditional pleasant impression， however as long as is a good movie， I will like

經典電影很多會體現現在傳統的美感，不過只要是好電影，我都會喜歡。

If is a book change of movie， I feel this have no intentional viewpoint， if the movie draws on a person enough， I think the original book that may see the bottom movie， if is a good book

如果是一本書換電影，我覺得這是沒有目的的觀點，如果電影足夠吸引人，我想可以看底層電影的原著，如果是一本好書．

I certainly think it can clap movie， see the oneself like of the person image move a screen up， can the better comprehension appreciate

我當然認為它可以拍電影，看到自己喜歡的人形象搬上屏幕，能更好的理解欣賞嗎?

⑼ 關於電影《THE PATRIOT》愛國者的理解 幫忙回答下啊 感激不盡 答案請發到郵箱[email protected]

SUMMARY

In this dramatization of the American Revolution, an ex-war hero (Gibson) is forced to fight and kill again when his family and home are threatened by the British.

THE SUDDEN RUNDOWN

The Patriot lacks originality and is mired by movie conventions, but still manages to be a well crafted film that is thoroughly entertaining.

WHAT'S GOOD

Going into this movie, I knew I was in for a long, historical epic--and I generally hate long, drawn out dramas. I have also seen Mel Gibson fight for freedom in Braveheart and Chicken Run, so the prospect of him battling for independence yet again didn't seem all that interesting. But despite these early strikes against it, I have to admit that The Patriot was a solid movie that will easily be amongst the top films of the year.

The Patriot is a historical drama focused on the American Revolution. Mel Gibson plays legendary war veteran Benjamin Martin, a single father with a large family. He is tormented daily by the memories of what he did to the French ring the war, praying for forgiveness and trying to avoid conflict. But his intentions to lay down the sword are dashed when the British march through his hometown and kill members of the local militia who are fighting for freedom. In the process, the redcoats, led by the cruel and merciless Colonel Tavington (played with perfect villainy by Jason Isaacs), destroy his house and kill one of his sons.

At this point, some 30 minutes into the story, the single greatest action moment of the whole movie occurs. Mel Gibson, enraged by the death of his son, goes completely Mad Max. He salvages all the weapons from his house, takes two of his surviving sons, and tracks down the British squad responsible for the carnage. While he has his two kids lay down cover fire for him, he sneaks up on the soldiers and slaughters them all one by one. Watching Gibson's character take out twenty men is truly a sight to behold: he shoots them, he smashes them with the barrel of his gun, and he hacks them to bits with a tomahawk. It's absolutely grizzly, and may very well be the most graphically violent scene in mainstream movies this year.

For the action enthusiast, The Patriot has an abundance of fighting scenes that have an unnerving sense of realism attached, thanks to the primitive depiction of war. Guns of this era are short range weapons that must be reloaded after every shot, allowing for God-knows-what to happen before you can squeeze off a second blast. Cannonballs smash into people with brutal consequences, breaking off heads and limbs in the most gruesome manner.

The story, while hardly original, is engaging from beginning to end. Benjamin Martin is a man who doesn't want to go back to killing. He is an idealist who wants to resolve America's grievances with England through politics. He refuses to fight, and because of this, some of his sons believe him to be cowardly. His oldest son, Gabriel (Heath Ledger), enlists in the local militia, gung-ho at the prospect of shedding blood for his country. Benjamin knows the harsh realities of war, and doesn't want his son to follow in his footsteps, but despite all his pleas, Gabriel goes off to war. Eventually, the battle comes to their home and affects them firsthand, and it's at that point that Benjamin realizes he must take action. He joins the militia and fights alongside his oldest son.

Jason Isaacs turns in an excellent performance as the central villain: the ruthless English Colonel Tavington. To the dismay of his military superior, he violates the rules of warfare in favor of getting the job done. He shoots children without remorse, he has a church burned to the ground, and he revels in extreme cruelty. He is therefore an excellent on-screen villain--twisted, intimidating, and perfectly evil.

The "buxom wench" look (see also Sleepy Hollow) appears to be in fashion ring this era, as evidenced by Joely Richardson's cumbersome, never changing wardrobe.

By bringing the battles onto American soil in the midst of simple townfolk, The Patriot casts the birth of our nation into a harsh perspective, driving home the fact that America was not always the pristine sanctuary we sometimes think it to be. But in spite of its mission to recreate the American Revolution, history is not the movie's strong point. Instead, its strengths are the well-paced action sequences, the father-son relationships found throughout, the ghosts in Benjamin's past, and the examination of vengeance as a virtue. For these elements, this is a movie not to be missed. And even though it clocks in at two and a half hours, it never gives you the chance to get bored.

WHAT'S BAD

The Patriot shamelessly embraces every movie trick in the book to elicit emotions. For example, Mel Gibson has a little girl who refuses to speak throughout most of the movie. But when he is about to leave for war again and the story requires a tearjerker, the little girl starts crying, "Daddy, daddy, don't go, I'll say anything you want." Damn, if that isn't the cheapest shot! It felt like they were only one step away from drowning puppy dogs or shooting crippled orphans. Still, the scene was well done, so instead of appearing cliche and cheesy, it was only transparent and unoriginal.

Other attempts to milk sympathy didn't fly so well. Soon after the oldest son Gabriel gets married, Tavington has the wife and all her fellow townspeople killed. I understand that it's supposed to give Gabriel an additional reason to want to kill Tavington, but it struck me as unnecessary. After all, Tavington had killed Gabriel's younger brother in the beginning of the movie, and so had already given him a reason for vengeance early on. Another reason it didn't really work was because the wife--despite being "the prettiest girl in all of town"--wasn't a very interesting character. In fact, the scene in which she lays peer pressure and guilt on the town in order to get the men to sign up for the militia struck me as the most shallow moment of the entire story.

Still other subplots are just outright bad: there's the stereotypical black guy who has to prove himself worthy in the eyes of his stereotypically racist white colleagues (and of course, he does). In fact, when it comes to race relations, The Patriot is painfully self-aware that it's a year 2000 movie in how it apologizes for slavery--it depicts the Martins as having a whole plantation full of black servants, but forces the caveat that "they're not really slaves, because that would be wrong." Mel Gibson and his family are made out to be "good masters" for the sole purpose of avoiding a confrontation with the audience. Just because we don't agree with slavery today doesn't mean it didn't happen, and I think the writers would have done well to spare us the convoluted fairy tale cleanliness.

For the most part, though, The Patriot succeeds even when it's being formulaic. And that, perhaps, is the reason why so many people enjoy it--it is a movie that is easily liked, with a solid story and a good cast.

⑽ 看英語電影愛國者2000的觀後感

看了《愛國者》，很受感動。影片講述的是一段美國獨立戰爭的歷史。主人公是一位議員和一群孩子的父親。一家人過得還算和-諧。作為父親，他在家裡有著相當的威嚴，而一群孩子也不是吃素的，他們的頑皮讓這位父親吃盡苦頭卻又無可奈何。但因其反對對英國作戰而被孩子們誤解，他們都有著自己的參軍夢，甚至遠遠聽到槍炮聲，他們也會熟練搬出槍以備不時之需。然而英軍的的到來改變了一切。在家園被毀又即將失去第二個兒子時父親終於爆發了，和兩個小兒子一起殲滅了一股二十一人的英軍，這讓人聯想到他當年的英姿，也讓他找回了自己潛藏的勇氣。在復仇和追求自由這兩條主線的引導下，主人公帶領著國民軍逐步走向勝利。
影片花了很大的手筆來闡述美國對自由的嚮往和因此付出的沉重代價，從激烈的議會討論，人們參軍的熱情，到家園的被毀，戰場上的慘烈犧牲。相信看過該片的決不會忘記那些古老而又獨特的戰爭場面，兩軍(正規軍)對壘都是以人員和武器作為籌碼，而這往往是英軍占優，美軍是即輸場面又輸戰爭，這看上去有點幽默的味道，完全是對現代戰爭的顛覆，看不到現代戰爭中的謀軍布局。而國民軍卻也會玩游擊戰，有一段時間竟被英軍稱之為「幽靈」，很有點中國特色的味道。但這確實是一支雜牌軍，就連教堂里的牧師也披裝上陣，只是不知道他在殺人之前會不會念上一句「上帝保佑」，其最後的犧牲卻也充滿了悲劇色彩。
雖然這是一部戰爭片，但是導演在戰爭之外的細節上有很好的把握，除了宏大的戰爭場面外，也不失暖暖的溫情，真實而感人。其中身為國民軍上校的父親與剛剛會說話的女兒的告別一段，導演處理得別具匠心，將主角在軍隊與家庭角色的矛盾和女兒對父親的理解盡融於女兒的呼喚和轉身的深情一抱之中，可謂感人至深。導演對種族矛盾的解構也是該片的亮點之一，最初白人對黑奴的歧視，通過戰爭的隱含功能最終達成了和解，「與你並肩作戰是我的榮幸。」將這對不大不小的矛盾融於對自由不懈追求的主題之中，也是對黑人在美國獨立戰爭中所做的貢獻的一種認同，他們也是美國歷史的創造者。
不能不說這是一部成功的影片，無論你對美國有如何的偏見，看了該片你卻不由的對那些為自由而戰的勇士們產生由衷的敬意，這確實是一個非凡的國度，這樣的民族沒有理由不屹立於世界強者之林。
然而相比之下，小時侯很喜歡的國產戰爭片，現在看來實在很少有深層次的東西，導演的思維極其狹隘，創作的影片只是對歷史的一種簡單重復。比如電影藝術大師斯皮爾伯格就將幾條命救一條命的價值問題帶入到影片〈〈拯救大兵瑞恩〉〉中，充滿了對人性的深入思考，從而使影片脫離了戰爭本身而得以實現主題的升華，像這樣的東西在中國的戰爭片里很難找到，不得不引起我們的反思。在根本上還得在思維的形式內涵上下一番工夫。