⑴ 求英語電影論文
《Alexander》about it. ——《亞歷山大大帝》觀後感~
I am a student, study more onerous task to all immersed in a pile, thick book of other aspects of knowledge about nature also less. In order to broaden their horizons, when choosing courses, I usually choose some human science classes. Remember when a friend gave high school had a Greek mythology to me, that is, from the book, I see a god of the mind and I've also is the traditional Chinese religion in the image of god is completely different. Greek mythology of the gods of the people who have thoughts, feelings, and the joy of the people, sadness, jealous, have fear. But god is the Oriental religions in, or even omnipotent, is ordinary mortals cannot be achieved. But because those books and the names of the gods and long, sometimes make me confused, I eventually failed to read the book. Myth, of course, is part of the culture of the classical Greek, in order to understand with many Greek mythology, when he saw the ancient Greek culture, when elective without hesitation, I chose. Fortunately, I choose. Through a study of the semester, although no Greek culture and in-depth understanding of ancient Greece, but the experienced periods have probably know for certain period of development, the typical of the political system, cultural phenomenon also have certain knowledge, I think is good harvest. Of course, the teacher said to the final paper to write, I still feel a bit silly, I don't know what good, because although much knowledge of ancient Greece, but to really understand some of the problems one write an essay, I think my knowledge is not enough. Just recently saw "Alexander of Alexander's life", interest, but to know before Alexander, so you have to find some information, and some of the facts is mentioned below from these materials, not do annotation.
Video introction
Alexander the great was about the history of the world's first emperor Alexander conquered Eurasian of life. Alexander BC, in Macedonian king is 3.56 Philip ii, once studied Aristotle, 19 years old father was assassinated succession to the throne. He first, then pacify defeated the Persian empire, began 22,000 miles of conquest. 25 years old, Alexander had established including the Nile valley, dry peninsula and the Ins civilization across Europe in Asia, but the Alexander under age 33 because inexplicable disease die suddenly.
In this film, Alexander the great friend (Anthony Hopkins ptolemaic general) through memory, the emperor's will as life. Forty years ago, Hollywood has taken Alexander, but only about his hero. The new version, full of adventure and dream from the childhood, thrust his parents fight, then the sad for him by Aristotle and mapping lesson, graally to his invicible paving the way to conquer. This is the life of the vivid characterization.
The director of Alexander oliver stone said: "this is probably the biggest challenges in my life, hope can make it much objective." In order to do this, stone is hard. Rafer specially invited professor of the university of Oxford robin Ryan fox as the historical consultant. The fox is research of Alexander the great expert, once wrote biographies of Alexander, sales of more than 100 million copies. He accepted the invitation gladly, but a condition, is to them in the emperor's elite cavalry, and must stand in the front of the team, he "fight" for Alexander dream.
Stone has invited the ancient linguists, tries to make some of the lines to real effect. Language Fox watched the movie said after school and historical scholars should get there watching for discussion.
However, if the movie history book, it obviously lost as the value of the movie. "Alexander" in the context of history, the plot details on again. Films, Alexander's father told him: a woman more dangerous than men, as the king had hurt his lover, Mother kept his place before him, said his father. Without these details on the history, but the parents struggle was mentioned. Alexander, such as wedding night, the bride almost killed him, although not in the historical lee, but the bride was defeated by Alexander, daughter of darius, the plot and have confidence. Therefore, the writer's creation that is reasonable, no violation of history.In addition, the recent history of the new viewpoint about Alexander historiography, more and more absorbed some characters, appear very full.
A pursuit of dreams
Above has been mentioned in the film, and the understanding of Alexander before, so he is the first impression from the movie, here is to put the matter what facts. Admittedly, the film Alexander some arbitrary, even some cold, but sometimes think conversely, if no such a domineering, pride and resolute, he can become a history of Chinese strategists hoyywood hills? However, I want to discuss and not his military command art, but his pursuit of dreams and in the process which reflects personality, it is exciting and amazing. If someone was born, this man is the conqueror Alexander. As a great soldier son, Alexander had been instilled many heroism and high adventure stories. He can reel off in the early lead, read Homer in the shelter of personality and lyrics. Whether in the house or in the battlefield, he had a pillow YiLiYaTe "with him to sleep. He led his Greek soldiers and defeated the Persian empire, strong and continue to crusade. Along the way, he and his army met with human body is similar, but what we know, hair, it is a monkey. They rode on large and those of the east, the elephant who had never seen defeated the monster. Of course, though, Alexander the great personality charm, many of his soldiers to fight for Alexander has faith, but for a long time, the journey of hard driving, the warriors who still alive and tired, they obviously very to return to his country and so on the roster appeared, the army also appeared a mutiny. One section, I is very impressive, when he determined to continue to advance in India, unwilling to part soldiers, one of the important general said a touching, they finally wish is only in them to the soldiers who died superempirical essence and meet them before the meeting, the wife and children. Alexander said: "yes, you're right, I, Ross, negligence. Should I send you back as soon as possible, all pensions from me to send, respected and wealthy, love, in the rest of you will be his wife and son of a hero, finally died peacefully. But your dreams, Ross, you, the simple, early in your child's life with Persia, with gold and silver in your pockets stuffed with you when you love, because it can destroy everything in the life of a man!" , kelat rose that touching words some long, here I will not lead to, but when I'm hearing his words, I was really touched by it and feel a mortal ordinary and true feelings, in my opinion, that he was not too. Then, Alexander the retort that enthusiasm, yes, Alexander and their pursuit of something different, he pursues the sun rays, the pursuit of great, so the life of ease, money and enjoy attractive for him, he defeated the Persian empire, Babylon the great wealth, costly court life and can't baffel him to continue the expedition.
Just after the movie's feelings, then some literatures on Alexander's expedition, some of the objective a detailed analysis. According to the data, Alexander expedition, he himself has said the Persian, and had ravaged sanctuary in Greece was assassinated Philip ii, the purpose is the expedition, revenge against the Persian stronger. But the specific analysis, find the reason for the expedition is just an excuse. Firstly, the assassination of the killer waves Philip ii, paulson and no relationship with the Persian empire. O Nebuchadnezzar, paulson wave is a young aristocrat, he and Philip ii, the generals have personal in Dallas. Whatever wave, is of Nebuchadnezzar's, but he SiYuan what action, really have no direct connection with the Persian empire. Alexander said he was assassinated in Persia, Philip ii, historical records on no. Secondly, from the assassination of Nebuchadnezzar, wave, paulson to Philip ii, so the action in advance of horses prepared assassination scene, it shows that he really otherwise conspiracy. Third, revenge is only according to Greek long-standing extremely extensive mental state, as to stimulate the greeks into the slogan of the Persian.
Anyway, I think it is worth affirmation, Alexander the great dream, in order to realize its can not wealth, enjoy thier rance and courage to explore the unknown.
2 Tim HeFei and about Alexander, RON
Alexander the great films, especially sexual orientation private life a lot dispute. In fact, he HeFei and ask the relationship, and I was at the movies process has been very puzzled, why history so great a character is gay? Believe that many people have the same doubts.However, when I accidentally see teacher site of excellent assignments exploring ancient Greek young titled "love", I feel like a life. For the love of the young this phenomenon from different aspects. First is the ancient greeks aesthetic idea. Ancient Greece is extremely attractive appearance and the worship of strong and handsome figure, in this respect, they don't care, as long as the male sex "golden hair, jiongjiongweishen eyes, ruddy complexion, strong muscle, broad shoulders." He must be able to attract others' eyes and love. Beautiful young completely meet greeks aesthetic standards and, in some cases, the young beauty of man can be less attractive girl. Secondly, the ancient Greek culture condition is the root of young love. The ancient culture and modern culture and the fundamental difference between the ancients to men, women, children in the man's eyes is only the mother and the family business managers. The ancient greeks regarded the spirit of man is the center of activities, they think that the girl was not what ecation, this kind of situation is caused by a woman because ecation condition, the cultural resources, and the spirit world of ancient Greek men spirit grades. This kind of social status can appear a situation: men and women together only flirting with youth, and can be found in the heart. They are likely to rationally between the dialogue lies not only in the young, beautiful, because they have more abundant knowledge and talent. Therefore, in ancient Greece appeared a modern difficult to understand customs: every man have attracted a boy or a young man, and in close daily life as his tutor, guardian and friends, also encouraged him to study all noble character. If any man have deceived than his little boy, will be considered not perform ties of a man, No one can get to a young man of friendship is a shame for. This kind of social and cultural customs in promoting cultural and ideological progress in a little deeper, to help build social moral standards have contribution. We can not surprised to find that most firmly hold the view that homosexuality is the most important and the most influential cultural elite of ancient Greece. At this point, even the spirit of love, Socrates also no exception.
In addition, a professor of the university of Oxford robin Ryan fox in the privacy of Alexander is explained. He said, Alexander has three wives, and his mistress, four grow up together, carry the HeFei partners have homosexual relations, and the one who Persian royal eunuch very close. The fox said, many of these ancient historians recorded the plot, compared with these records could be understatement. While these sparked controversy, because of different age has different view. Ancient Greece, polygamy and homosexuality is normal, Christian Europe, strict monogamy was established, homosexuality was considered evil, so, if we use today's morality to request more than 2,000 years ago, the ancients are serious distortion.
Want to use words to summarize the feeling after see: "bravely to pursue their dreams!"
⑵ 高分 英語論文 電影
什麼意思？是關於英語電影的論文嗎？
我家倒有一份，是簡愛的。
本人感覺《肖申克的救贖》不怎麼樣，我聽過好多人對他的評論都不是很好，比如二樓推薦的像《阿甘正傳》那樣勵志的電影，就是比較有意義的，又好寫而且選材也不錯。像這樣的電影有好多（可以從名著上找）。
我當時選的是《簡愛》，因為我很喜歡這不作品。其實5000並不多，只要你肯認真讀下去，對作品有自己的簡介，再參考一些相關的資料，我相信你會寫好的，到那時你就覺得5000是小CASE了。你現在沒有讀，不去了解，就算別人怎麼給你啟發你也寫不出來。等你讀過後再向人請教就沒問題了。
⑶ 英語電影或小說觀後感（70字）
《哈利波特》英文讀後感I've just fininshed reading the first 4 Harry Potter books for about the 5th time through, and they're just as magical and affecting as they have ever been. Everything is in here: suspense, adventure, mystery, humour, danger. There's even some pretty satisfying paybacks. The characters are fantastic and fantastically realistic. There are bad people who turn out to be good guys and good people who turn out to be bad guys, just like life.
I think the thing I like best about these books is the message that it's okay to be different - to be not "normal." I would love for everyone in school to have hear that message. It would probably rece the bullying around the school.
These books value real thoughts. Much has been made of Harry's rule breaking, but only once in the series so far does he break a rule for arbitrary personal gain. Most of the time he makes a decision that what's right is more important than what's written. And you know what? Life's like that sometimes. I think it's great that kids are getting an example of how to do what's right even when it involves breaking rules. The Potter books also show that there are consequences for rule breaking. If not getting caught and getting a detention, then a spell going wrong and someone getting turned into a cat. This shows that when you make a decision to go against the rules that things may not go as you expected and you have to take responsibility for the outcome.
⑷ 求一篇英國著名小說的英文鑒賞論文，400字左右。在線等。急用。
《呼嘯山莊》英文讀後感
Published in 1847, WUTHERING HEIGHTS was not well received by the reading public, many of whom condemned it as sordid, vulgar, and unnatural--and author Emily Bronte went to her grave in 1848 believing that her only novel was a failure. It was not until 1850, when WUTHERING HEIGHTS received a second printing with an introction by Emily's sister Charlotte, that it attracted a wide readership. And from that point the reputation of the book has never looked back. Today it is widely recognized as one of the great novels of English literature.
Even so, WUTHERING HEIGHTS continues to divide readers. It is not a pretty love story; rather, it is swirling tale of largely unlikeable people caught up in obsessive love that turns to dark madness. It is cruel, violent, dark and brooding, and many people find it extremely unpleasant. And yet--it possesses a grandeur of language and design, a sense of tremendous pity and great loss that sets it apart from virtually every other novel written.
The novel is told in the form of an extended flashback. After a visit to his strange landlord, a newcomer to the area desires to know the history of the family--which he receives from Nelly Deans, a servant who introces us to the Earnshaw family who once resided in the house known as Wuthering Heights. It was once a cheerful place, but Old Earnshaw adopted a "Gipsy" child who he named Heathcliff. And Catherine, daughter of the house, found in him the perfect companion: wild, rude, and as proud and cruel as she. But although Catherine loves him, even recognizes him as her soulmate, she cannot lower herself to marry so far below her social station. She instead marries another, and in so doing sets in motion an obsession that will destroy them all.
WUTHERING HEIGHTS is a bit difficult to "get into;" the opening chapters are so dark in their portrait of the end result of this obsessive love that they are somewhat off-putting. But they feed into the flow of the work in a remarkable way, setting the stage for one of the most remarkable structures in all of literature, a story that circles upon itself in a series of repetitions as it plays out across two generations. Catherine and Heathcliff are equally remarkable, both vicious and cruel, and yet never able to shed their impossible love no matter how brutally one may wound the other.
As the novel coils further into alcoholism, section, and one of the most elaborately imagined plans of revenge it gathers into a ghostly tone: Heathcliff, driven to madness by a woman who is not there but who seems reflected in every part of his world--dragging her corpse from the grave, hearing her calling to him from the moors, escalating his brutality not for the sake of brutality but so that her memory will never fade, so that she may never leave his mind until death itself. Yes, this is madness, insanity, and there is no peace this side of the grave or even beyond.
It is a stunning novel, frightening, inexorable, unsettling, filled with unbridled passion that makes one cringe. Even if you do not like it, you should read it at least once--and those who do like it will return to it again and again
⑸ 【緊急求助】誰能幫忙提供一篇關於《了不起的蓋茨比》電影與小說比較的論文的外文文獻，謝謝~
郵箱在哪裡？
Adaptations in the Classroom: Using Film to "Read" The Great Gatsby
Dennis Cutchins - 2003
⑹ 任何一篇英美短篇小說的英語論文
《呼嘯山莊》人物關系結構
Title：
Catherine's dilemma between love and marriage in Wuthering Heights
——The Psychoanalysis of love triangle relationship with Freud』s theory of personality
Abstract：
Wuthering Heights tells a story of superhuman love and revenge enacted on the English moors. In this thesis, an attempt is made to analyze the love triangle relationship which leads to Catherine's dilemma between love and marriage in Wuthering Heights by virtue of Freud』s theory of personality.
Key words：
Wuthering Heights Freud』s theory of personality love triangle relationship
In Catherine's heart she knows what is right, but chooses what is wrong. It is her wrong decision that pushes her into the inextricable [LunWenJia.Com]dilemma between her love and marriage; it is her wrong choice that plunges the two families into chaos. In the mind, she is truly out of her way.
According to Sigmund Freud(1856—1939), the structure of the mind or personality consists three portions: the id, the ego, and the superego.「The id, which is the reservoir of biological impulses, constitutes the entire personality of the infant at birth. Its principle of operation, to guard the person from painful tension, is termed the pleasure principle. Inevitable frustrations of the id, together with what the child learns from his encounters with external reality, generate the ego, which is essentially a mechanism to minimize frustrations of the biological drives in the long run. It operates according to the reality principle … [LunWenNet.Com]The superego comprises the conscience, a partly conscious system of introjected moral inhibitions, and the ego-ideal, the source of the indivial's standards for his own behavior. Like external reality, from which it derives, the superego often presents obstacles to the satisfaction of biological drives.」「In the mentally healthy person, these three systems form a unified and harmon
ious organization. Conversely, when the three systems of personality are at odds with one another the person is said to be maladjusted.」 Here Catherine's tragic psychological process may be well illustrated by Freudian psychoanalysis.
「I cannot express it; but surely you and everybody have a notion that there is, or should be, an existence of yours beyond you. What were the use of my creation, if I were entirely contained here？」 Catherine's strange words reflect that the intelligent Emily Bronte had been earlier pondering over a same question in her work. What on earth is「the existence of Catherine's beyond Catherine」？
Here we may believe that Heathcliff stands for Catherine's instinctual nature and the strongest desire—her 「id」 in the depths of her soul; Edgar, her ideal 「superego」, represents another part of her personality: the well-bred gracefulness and the superiority of a wealthy family; and she, herself is the 「ego」 tortured by the friction between the two in the disharmonious situation.
In the light of Freud's theory of personality, 「the superego is the representation in the personality of the traditional values and ideals of society as they are handed down from parents to children.」 Catherine's choice of Edgar as her husband is to satisfy her ideal 「superego」 to get wealth and high social position, which are the symbol of her class, on the basis of the ecation by her family and reality from her early childhood. She is a Miss of a noble family with a long history of about three hundred years. Only the marriage well-matched in social and economic status could be a satisfaction for all: her family, the society and even her practical self. 「It would degrade me to many Heathcliff now ... if Heathcliff and I married, we should be beggars？」 This is her actual worry for her future. Catherine yields to the pressure from her brother, and alike, in truth, she is yielding to the moral rules of society, without the approval and identification of which, she could not live a better life or even exist i
n it at all.
However, Catherine underestimates what her other more intrinsic self would have effect on her. The most remarkable claim by Catherine herself may be the best convincing evidence to distinguish the different roles of Heathcliff and Edgar—her 「id」 and her 「superego」:
「My great miseries in this world have been Heathcliff's miseries, and I watched and felt each from the beginning: my great thought in living is himself. If all else perished, and he remained, I should still continue to be; and if all else perished, and he was annihilated, the universe would turn to a mighty stranger: I should not seem a part of it. My love for Linton is like foliage in the woods: time will change it. I'm well aware, as winter changes the trees. My love for Heathcliff resembles the eternal rocks beneath: a source of little visible delight, but necessary. Nelly, I'm Heathcliff! He's always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure and more than I am always a pleasure to me, but as my own being. So don't talk of our separation again: it is impracticable.」
It was a happy thought to make her love the kind, wealthy, weak, elegant Edgar, yet in submission to her superego to oppose against her id, she would fall into a loss of the self. Since the id is the most primitive basis of personality, and the ego is formed out of the id, Catherine's life depends wholly on Heathcliff， as the whole connotation and truth of her life in the cosmic world, for its existence and further more for the significance of her existence. Heathcliff is the most necessary part of her being. She marries Edgar, but Heathcliff still clutches her soul in his passionate embrace. Although she is a bit ashamed of her early playmate, she loves him with a passionate abandonment that sets culture, ecation, the world at defiance. Catherine's wrong choice for marriage violates her inner desires. The choice is a victory for self-inlgence—a sacrifice of primary to secondary things. And she pays for it.
On one hand, Catherine doesn't find the heavenly happiness she was longing for. Though as a girl 「full of ambition」and 「to be the greatest woman of the neighborhood」 would be her pride, the enviable marriage could only flatter her vanity for a second. After her marriage, the comfortable and peaceful life in the Grange was just a monotonous and lifeless confinement of her soul. She feels chocked by the artificial and unnatural conditions in the closed Thrushcross Grange— a world in which the mind has hardened and become unalterable.「If I were in heaven, Nelly, I should be extremely miserable. 」 Catherine eventually knows that the Lintons' heaven is not her ideal heaven. She and Heathcliff really possess their common heaven. Just as Catherine says,「Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same; and Linton's is as different as a moonbeam from lightning, or frost from fire.」
Catherine doesn't want to live in the Lintons' heaven; on the other hand, she has lost her own paradise that she ever had with Heathcliff on the bare hard moor in their childhood. The deepest bent of her nature announces her destiny—a wanderer between the two worlds. When she is alive, she occupies a position midway between the two. She belongs in a sense to both and is constantly drawn first in Heathcliff's direction, then in Edgar's, and then in Heathcliff's again and at last she loses herself completely. Her childish illusion to use her husband's money to aid Heatllcliff to rise out of her brother's power has vanished in thin air. And her constant struggle to reconcile two irreconcilable ways of life is in vain too, which only caused more disorder in the two worlds and in herself as well.
In Freudian principles, should the ego continually fail in its task of satisfying the demands of the id, these three factors together—the painful repression of the id's instinctual desires, the guilt conscience of revolt against the superego's wishes, and the frustration of failure in finding outlets in the external world- would contribute to ever-increasing anxiety. The anxiety piles up and finally overwhelms the person. When this happens, the person is said to leave hallucinatory wish-fulfillment, then a nervous radical breakdown, and in the end may finish the person off. Catherine is destroyed into psychic fragmentation by the friction between the two. At the height of her Edgan-Heathcliff torment, Catherine lies delirious on the floor at the Grange. She dreams that she is back in her own old bed at Wuthering Heights 「enclosed in the oak-paneled bed at home, and my heart ached with some great grief…my misery arose from the separation that Hindley had ordered between me and Heathcliff.」Still dreaming, she t
ries to push back the panels of the oak bed, only to find herself touching the table and the carpet at the Grange:「My late anguish was swallowed in a paroxysm of despair. I cannot say why I was so wildly wretched ... and my all in all, as Heathcliff was at that time, and been converted at a stroke into Mrs. Linton...the wife of a stranger: an exile, and outcast.」 She attempts to forget the lengthy days of years of life without her soul even in her temporary derangement.「Most strangely, the whole last seven years of my life grew a blank! I did not recall that they had been at all.」 Her mental and physical decay rapidly leads to the body's mortal end. She dies and seems to have none into perfect peace.
But even after her death, she is still a wandering ghost. In Chapter 3, Lockwood, the lodger in Catherine's oak-paneled bed at Wuthering Heights dreams about the little wailing ghost:
「The intense horror of nightmare came over me: I tried to draw back my arm, but the hand clung to it, and a most melancholy voice sobbed, 『Let me in-Let me in』.『 Who are you?』…『Catherine Linton』, it replied, shiveringly…『I'm come home: I'd lost my way on the moor!』…Terror made me cruel; and finding it useless to attempt shaking the creature off, I pulled its wrist on to the broken pane, and rubbed it to and fro till then blood ran down and soaked the bedclothes: still it wailed, 『Let me in!』…it is twenty years, twenty years. I've been a waif for twenty years!」
Catherine aspires to be back in her heaven even being a spirit. But leer self-deceptive decision has made her fall from her and Heathcliff's heaven full of demonic love and her never docile or submissive nature has drawn her out of her and Edgar's heaven filled with civilized emptiness in the meantime. She pushes herself into her tragedy, the endless dilemma between her love and marriage, which won't end up with her death.
Bibliography：
1.Bronte Emily，Wuthering Heights，Beijing：Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press，London：Oxford University Press 1995
2.Freud Sigmund，Interpretation of Dreams，Beijing：Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press 2001
3.Travis Trysh，Heathcliff and Cathy，the Dysfunctional Couple，The Chronicle of Higher Ecation，Washington，2001
4.Steinitz Rebecca，Diaries and Displacement in Wuthering Heights，Studies in the Novel，Denton，2000
http://www.lunwennet.com/thesis/List_21.html 裡面有你需要的英語論文，我載老一篇，不合適切看下嘛，呵呵！！！
⑺ 觀看兩部英文電影或閱讀兩本英文小說,寫100字左右觀後感或讀後感。
Pride and Prejudice,one of Jane Austen』s greatest works,was published in 1813.It talks about trivial matters of love,marriage and family life between country squires and fair ladies in Britain in the 18th century.The novel that attracts reader most is the wonderful vivid presentation of characters,especially through their witty and bright conversations.In Pride and Prejudice,people with different characters have different attitudes to love which leads to their various marriages.The three couples,varied in their characters,presented us with three different distinct marriages.
我的論文的一部分哈,貢獻給你了.
是英語原聲電影觀後感,傲慢與偏見
⑻ 英語作文 幫我寫一篇看完一部英文原版電影或英文小說後的觀後感的英語文章.
Last " receive by Buddhist nun legend inferior " for the first time,from sighing over with feeling to: Only fill childlike innocence, could take so wonderful and strange a film; Only full of childlike innocence, could appreciate that there is not evil and simple world so. First of all, this piece about magic magnificent story of country, background but cruel fierce World War II, therefore much motives of the author's, it be able to be in the happy and auspicious, quiet countryside atmosphere to hope, the flames of war far away from real world, military service, wandering about as a refugee and launching air raids. Certainly, magic country there is evilness too, fight too, this is realistic reflection and refraction too.
Secondly,open fairy tale the worlds door, protagonist in hide-and-seek game at unintentionally inside wardrobe find, such a plot very apt cater to we childhood memory,too suffused with have in mind have in childhood about fairy tale imagination of the world, it is novel to be full of, is full of yearning for. Who have fantasies of, pass beautiful fairyland never? Who never wants to have animal's friend? Who have fantasies of oneself become and save the world hero never? We can say, so pure Meng Tong, owned by everyone.
Moreover, the plot of the story establishes and fully reveals much motives written and directed too. It is likewise magic slice, the darker and uncannier " Harry and Potter " becomes more and more; And theme and content of " lord of rings ", have, suited to epic property that alt appreciate. " receive Buddhist nun inferior legend ", plot it is prominent and evil to set against for development to have, the theme is to help justice to overcome evilness, accord with children world of eyes, have only a simple one good and broken to distinguish the fact. This children inmature lovely at the same time. On the visual effect, the more outstanding one lies in the specially good effect scene that the computer makes, shake regret and stimulate at the conspicuous battle field, accord with to appreciate interesting child too.
Pat" receive Buddhist nun's inferior legend ", need childlike innocence; See " receive Buddhist nun's inferior legend ", need a childlike innocence too. Because,all of us once have dream -like child.
⑼ 急求英美電影欣賞論文（英文的）
Men of Honor
《斯蒂文森小說精華》下卷收錄《黑箭》及《綁架》，這兩部長篇都是非常引人入勝的歷史小說。在介紹二書各自的時代背景以前，不妨讓我們先來鳥瞰一下英國歷史，它的大脈絡，那是很有趣的。
提起英國，人們只知道是個老牌帝國主義，十九世紀首先就是這匹惡狼闖進我們的家園。但是，在不列顛（聯合王國除開北愛爾蘭）那片土地（約略相當於我國湖南省）上，曾經多少次遭受外族血與火的蹂躪？多少次山河變色、國破家亡？一代又一代，有多少個入侵者、殺人兇犯，又有多少個英奸、賣國賊，最後都成了他們民族英雄和歷史偉人，我們中有幾位能夠說瞭然於胸呢？一筆一筆血淋淋的陳年舊帳，整個的英國歷史我們可以大體上概括為：三次種族大換血，三次淪為殖民地（即文化大換血或輸血），三次開門揖盜，引狼入室，認賊作父——其中兩回全國都成了我們中國的吳三桂。這就是一部英國史！
大約距今九千年以前，不列顛諸島與歐洲大陸還是連成一體的，那裡居住著中石器時代的地中海人和阿爾卑斯人。約五千年前，伊比利亞人自地中海地區西遷，是首批從大陸渡海過來的，征服了原有的居民。這次征服必定十分野蠻悲慘，使我們已經找不到任何中石器人的痕跡了。著名文化古跡索爾茲伯里平原上的怪石圈，就是伊比利亞人留下來的。是為第一次換血。
到了約兩千五百年以前，有凱爾特人自今天德國南部一路砍殺過來，先後佔領了今日法蘭西、西班牙、葡萄牙、義大利等地，接著又越海占據了不列顛諸島，殘酷屠戮伊比利亞人。是為第二次換血。
自公元一世紀中葉，羅馬帝國對不列顛進行了長達四百年的殖民統治。政府、法律和商業都使用拉丁語，只剩下鄉下人才說凱爾特話。鋪石的公路自此四通八達，繁榮城鎮星羅棋布，羅馬人還帶來了基督教，其文化、習俗、生活用品也大量滲入，整個社會生活都羅馬化了。直到五世紀初老家起火，他們才開始撤離。這是第一次被殖民地化。[ 轉自鐵血社區 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]
前門去狼，後門進虎。緊接著於五世紀中葉，原居住在西北歐的三個日耳曼野蠻部族——盎格魯、撒克遜和朱特人橫渡北海，所謂「條頓人的征服」，（嚴格地講，可以說是四次引狼入室。因為羅馬軍團撤離以後，軟弱的不列顛暴露於北方野蠻蘇格蘭人同皮克人的侵擾之下。據說首先是一位凱爾特部族領袖，主動邀請朱特人前來協辦國防的；而朱特人見有隙可乘，後來才反客為主，並引發盎格魯及撒克遜人也來大舉入侵。）耗時一百五十年。秦始皇焚書坑儒？小菜一碟！日耳曼人把凱爾特整個一個民族的成年男子幾乎打殺干凈啦（第三次換血）！他們這些劊子手構成了今天英吉利民族的主體。自然，殘留的婦孺免不了繁衍生息，於是一代又一代的混血種橫空出世。
金庸歷史小說非常有趣，其耐看不亞於斯蒂文森。然而，若按照小說中那些仁人志士伸張正義、替天行道的血性脾氣，非得要報伊比利亞人同凱爾特人，還有中石器人的血海深仇，將那些屠夫的孽種——今日的英國人，殺個精光不可！
歷三四百年七國並存（類春秋戰國）的局面，遲到九世紀初，延伸至十一世紀初，日耳曼野蠻人終於從自身各個部族紛亂稱雄之中名義上得到統一，演繹出英國統治世系的第一個朝代——撒克遜系。
就在撒克遜系統御國家的同時，九至十一世紀，來自北歐的維京海盜——其中主要是丹麥人，大規模入侵英國。他們除了在英格蘭東北部建立「丹麥區」，進行直接赤裸裸的統治之外，以後又向南方擴張。到十一世紀上半葉，雖說不斷受到盎格魯撒克遜人的反抗，仍有三十年之久，整個英格蘭都已置於了丹麥國王卡紐特統治之下 ——此三十年即英國朝廷的第二系，丹麥系。前後歷三百年，語言、文化、司法、度量衡……無不受到深深的影響。屈辱的殖民地史，居然列入了國祚的正統。
十一世紀中葉卡紐特帝國瓦解以後，政權重歸撒克遜人的手中，是謂西撒克遜系。但是新王愛德華之母卻是個諾曼底人（所謂諾曼底人本來也不是諾曼底的人，而是原居住於北歐的諾曼人，於九世紀南徙至今法國西北部、由於他們到來才稱做諾曼底的地方，安頓了下來。操法語，與法國同化了。當時受封於國王的公爵，其領地叫公國，伯爵的叫伯國。十世紀初建立了諾曼底公國，為法國封建諸侯中最強大的；名份上為法王屬下，實際有相當的獨立性），國王本人是個半撒克遜半諾曼底的雜種，他自幼在諾曼底長大，長期流亡於茲，三十八歲才回國。即位以後便大量起用諾曼底人，還跟其表弟諾曼底公爵結為聯盟，以抗衡國內的貴族，並使法語成為社會上層主要的交流工具。可謂里通外國、引狼入室之先聲。
一○六六年，那位表弟諾曼底公爵威廉，根據表哥生前有讓他繼位之願望，率兵五千乘艦隊入侵英國，打敗並殺死了新王哈羅德。英國大主教於西敏寺為之加冕，憑著聖經將英格蘭交付與之，不久他便攜著一批歸順的大主教、王孫貴族，返回諾曼底去也。勝利的法國人幾年以內不斷焚毀村莊，殺戮平民，掠奪英國貴族的土地以犒賞親屬及隨從，統治上層換成了諾曼人的天下，新貴族取代了盎格魯撒克遜的老貴族，諾曼底——法蘭西語和諾曼——法蘭西法律成了英格蘭宮廷、英格蘭貴族的語言和法律。教會也由法國來的義大利籍大主教接管了。然而，正是這位建立了諾曼底王朝的外國殖民君主同他的世子（繼位者）們，於司法制度、興建教堂乃至形成上議院、文化……等等方面諸多建樹，即是說從世俗（硬體）同靈魂（軟體）兩個方面，為社會公正奠定了基礎，開創了不朽的盛世基業，很有一點漢武帝的氣象哩！原先盎格魯撒克遜時期每個人只有一個單名，現今這樣名字後邊尾以姓氏，也是模仿他們法國貴族來的，這便是第三次殖民地化。自此以後，再也沒有外族跨海入侵、成立霸業的情事了。君主世襲制度也是從威廉肇始，故被英國人大捧特捧為「征服者威廉」，幾乎被當成我們的堯舜禹湯（真是一群厚顏無恥的亡國奴）！[ 轉自鐵血社區 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]
說起堯舜禹湯，要提一下英國朝代遞嬗的歷史，那是遲到九世紀之初，自撒克遜國王埃格伯特開端的；較之我國西周共和，要晚上一千六百多年。一千二百年以來劃為三個系、九代王朝，九朝當中還夾著一個共和政體。三系前邊已經交代過了，第一代王朝便是這位威廉一世所建立。近一百年以後，安茹（法國地名）伯爵亨利二世（威廉一世的重外孫，又是一個外國人）跑到英國來，創建了安茹（又名金雀花）王朝——試設想一下，中國歷史上若在北京建立一個約克（英地名）王朝或普瓦提埃（法地名）王朝，敝國上邦的文人們會不出來文飾一番，聽由它赤裸裸洋名字刺激自己的自尊心嗎？兩朝共歷三個半世紀之久，其中很長一段時間英國都是在法國國王的指揮棒下，讓法國人或其後裔黃袍加身，君臨英土。他們既是英國的一國之主，又在法國享有大片封地，作為法國藩鎮，法王的附庸，其實心裡只把英國當成一塊殖民地，諾曼底才是他們的老巢，他們的根。一世以下有七位帝君，他們對英國只是遙領而已，大部分時間仍舊都呆在諾曼底的，其第六位在位十年，居留英國還不及一年哩。你看清兵入關，滿人主宰天下以後，表現比他們還要好一些。盡管如此，英國人不去卧薪嘗膽，不去做伯夷叔齊，偏還要把亨利二世這個法國拐子，也看作他們歷史上最偉大的君王之一！直到十三世紀初法王將諾曼底收了回去，英國的君主這才慢慢地，開始一心一意作個名副其實的英國國王了。又過了將近兩百年，朝廷重行回復到英國血統手中，開始了蘭開斯特王朝。不過這一回殖民地亡國奴的滋味還要有得嘗，又經歷了大半個世紀，下一個約克王朝的第一任國王開始，才可以娶英國女子——而非法國女子，為王後；再又到建立都鐸王朝的國王手上，英語才取代法語成為官方語言。到十八世紀的三十年代在法庭上才廢止法語使用英語。
剩下來還有兩次值得一提。第一回在一六八九年，中國的吳三桂剛剛於十年前閉上眼睛，英國大多數宗教徒出於強烈反對天主教國王掌政，不顧不久前荷蘭海軍駛入泰晤士河奇襲英皇家艦艇的國恥（1666年6月，荷蘭海軍迅雷不及掩耳沖入泰晤士河，炮毀英國艦只無數，王家船塢付諸一炬，尤為奇恥大辱者海軍旗艦「皇家查爾斯號」竟被虜走。炮聲隆隆，倫敦震撼，實實在在預演了一場珍珠港事變），請求國王的女兒瑪麗同她的丈夫、荷蘭統治者威廉（威廉不僅是國王的女婿，還是他的親外甥）前來承繼王位。於是女兒偕同女婿率軍登陸英國，打得老豆跟老岳丈落荒而逃（當時瑪麗的胞妹安，以及她的丹麥丈夫，倒向姐姐、姐夫一邊，也背叛了老爹及泰山。後來安繼威廉三世為女王，這個忤逆不孝的女人惡有善報，極富政聲）。群臣請命：「瑪麗女王，威廉攝政，如何？」「不幹！」於是這位既有德國也有英國血統的荷蘭雜種威廉三世，英國話都說不好的，堂而皇之地坐上了龍椅（瑪麗為王後）。中國人要質問：倫理焉在，仁義何存？簡直豈有此理！可是，沿襲至今虛君實相的民主政治體制——議會高於國王、平民院高於貴族院 ——正是此時確立，兩黨制格局也自茲形成；還有大敗法王路易十四、成就英第一帝國等等功業。因此，英國人把這次不怎麼流血的外戚入侵、大家都當亡國奴，十分自豪地稱之為「光榮革命」，看得比中國人心目中的唐宗宋祖，還要高出許多頭哩。
第二回是在二十五年以後，安女王仙逝無嗣，同樣出於英國國教對天主教的排斥，遵照國會法案，舉國迎接女王的表兄弟、德國番佬、漢諾威公爵喬治登基，稱喬治一世。根本不會說英語，又在德國土生土長的他（其太子，後來繼位的國王也一樣），開始了史書上倒數第二個王朝，那又是一個以外國地名命名的王朝！此王朝繁演了一百多年，傳到了維多利亞。嘩，這位十八歲少女直到白發蒼蒼八十二歲老太太，金鑾殿上龍椅一坐就是六十四年，比咱們康熙老皇帝還要長哇！可這個維多利亞不也是個雜種嗎，原來她的母親本是德意志一個小公國的寡婦，後來嫁到了英國王室。女王從小就在日耳曼人的教養下長大，母語說德語，英語一輩子也說得不地道。登基三年後又嫁給她所狂熱崇拜的一位母系的表弟——不消說，那是個純種日耳曼，狼子野心、非我族類無疑的嘍！此後更加封親王，倚之為左右手，批閱公文，干預朝政，（嗚呼，大權旁落，一至於斯！）然而天哪，正是這一對野夫婦，文治武功，創造出英國歷史上最輝煌的黃金時代！中國的中山路、中山堂、中山大、中山醫科大……已經夠多的啦，而以她維多利亞命名的，更遍及英、加、澳、亞、非諸多地域，還要多得多啊。英國人拿勝利、勇氣、恆心、真理、母性、正義、科學與文藝、和平與進步……幾乎所有想得到的頌辭，都奉獻給了她，親王也同樣地世世代代倍受尊崇。你們瞧這個國民有多賤！其實，維多利亞的意義不僅限於英國。十八世紀，世界文明的重心在巴黎；十九世紀三十年代以後，即進入維多利亞時代，世界文明的重心到了倫敦。
以上這一類故事並不僅限於英國。我們知道古代日耳曼本是一個游牧民族，精壯男子去外邊打仗，不斷奪取新的土地，然後整個部落，男女老少，不斷地易地遷居。他們極其重視榮譽，而這種榮譽是建立在比狠斗勇上邊，認為掠奪、流血得來的財物，遠比誠實勞動——流汗得來的光榮。所以打仗——掠奪，便成了生活的至高目的。為了搶劫不惜殺身成仁，捨生取義，血流成河，何等的悲壯！公元前一○二年，二十萬條頓人於今法國馬賽附近幾乎全數被殲，死屍之多，居民不得不用白骨去砌葡萄園的藩籬。次年另一支日耳曼人在義大利北部犧牲更為慘烈，不單男人個個戰死不屈，婦女們也成群先殺死自己的孩子，然後自刎。而歐洲人脈管中涌動著的，正是古羅馬人（也是好戰的種族）和古日耳曼人的血液！由此我們得知，如同漢民族這樣死守著東亞一大片腹地，老子說「夫唯兵者不詳之器」，墨子主張「非攻」，勤勤懇懇地從事農耕；三千年來各種民族成份無太大變動地延續了下來，雖足堪自豪，卻並非世界人類史的唯一模式。
固然，王室皇族之間跨國互通嫁娶在歐洲的歷史中據有特殊的地位，甚至曾經與民族國家之逐步形成同步進行，這一點本來同中國不大相同。即便是如此，從以上我們仍然可以得知，英國人是把宗教信仰、經濟、政治的現實利益，以及實際政績，看得高於抽象的民族感情的。所以像漢族這樣，將對民族的忠貞當作超乎一切最高的價值標准，不惜擲頭顱灑熱血，赴湯蹈火；譬如從明末無數忠義之士壯烈殉國，清初到處反清復明，直鬧到秋瑾，乃至孫中山還要靠黑社會排滿起家，並不是人類文明史惟一的模式。
中國村只是地球上的一個角落，行善的人喜歡說「將心比心」，將心比心無疑是非常之好的；但是若認為鄰村的善惡標准、價值取向，也應當同自己的一模一樣，那便要謬誤千里了。今天，跨在廿一世紀門檻上的我國青少年理應知己知彼，對這個多元的世界，對其他各個國家不同的歷史，有更多的了解，具更博大的眼光，更寬闊的胸懷，以便當一個不至於丟人現眼的地球公民。愛國主義源於普遍的人性，民族沙文主義則要不得。
歷史家皮名舉有言「不學本國史不知道中國的偉大，不學西洋史不知道中國的落後」。信哉！
⑽ 關於「小說和電影」的比較,寫一篇對比類的英文作文
ThewholemovieisalittleSimba'sgrowthhistory,thinkofwatchingthemoviemyself,reallylike,,,hairtemper,Ireallydonotshould,LionKingmovieFeedback.hohelpedme,sincerelysay---thankyou,,alotofworry.Iliketheinsideofthecharacters,likethisfunstoryfullofjoy,.,,althoughnotinthemovie,butitisnoteasy.,