『壹』 ！！！！急求英語電影的英語影評
簡愛
Kent
State
University's
school
of
theatre
and
dance
performed
a
rendition
of
the
classic,
Jane
Eyre
this
month.
The
show
was
a
musical
with
all
of
the
necessary
elements
to
lift
you
from
your
seat
and
submerse
youinto
a
society
in
nineteenth
century
England
from
the
time
the
cell
phone
shut-off
announcement
was
made
until
the
last
note
at
the
curtain
call.
The
recurring
arches,
darkened,
soft
lighting,
and
the
use
of
a
classic
chorus
to
go
along
with
them
alluded
that
a
sinister
underbelly
of
social
status
and
reputation
were
present
in
the
performance.
One
of
the
first
things
that
an
audience
member
noticed
was
the
grandeur
of
the
set.
It
was
composed
of
a
gothic-style
foreground
with
rustic
twigs
of
a
root-like
earthy
appearance.
There
were
grand
arches
for
windows
and
entries
as
well.
Also,
the
background
was
a
large
arch
with
the
silhouette
of
roots.
There
were
also
two
matching
greek-style
pillar
arches
on
either
side
of
the
stage.
They
added
a
lot
to
many
messages
of
the
show.
For
one,
they
were
grand
structures
that
were
barren
inside
which
is
much
like
Mr.
Rochester
himself.
He
was
a
man
of
high
social
stature
but
felt
enslaved
by
his
trick
of
a
marriage
and
his
grand
yet
incomplete
(without
a
true
love)
home.
The
arches
also
suggest
the
importance
of
reputation
with
the
same
sort
of
fundamental
grand
image
yet
emptiness.
The
way
that
people
are
enslaved
yet
scramble
to
ascertain
that
solid
image
amongst
their
peers.
The
arches
were
almost
inviting
the
audience
to
come
inside
to
reveal
their
secret,
the
thing
that
was
hidden
deep
inside
that
could
send
the
structure
crumbling
in
ruin.
『貳』 求經典外國電影影評---要英文版本的
珍珠港的影評
pearl harbour film review
Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.
Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?
If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.
Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions
『叄』 2012英文電影影評
007第一集，大反派諾博士是個中國人，這部電影上映於1962年的10月5日，之後15天，中印邊境沖突爆發，4年之後，文革中的中國進一步封閉了自己，謎一般的紅色風暴自東方而起，席捲了整個世界，而那些嘶喊吼叫著的左派學生們其實並不知道當時的中國在發生著什麼。
文革過去33年了，西方人眼中的中國是什麼樣子？這個問題始終挑動著所有中國人的心，我們就如同一個少年，有著讓人自豪的成績，也有著不可忽略的缺點，毛躁地期待著，期待著所有人都為那些成績喝彩，所有人都放過那些缺點。我們在每一部大片中尋找著中國的影子，在每一個應該有大國出現的大場面中尋找那紅色的旗幟，在每一次世界面臨奇思異想的滅頂之災時都期盼著中國的出現。我們等來的是什麼呢？是破舊野蠻如集中營一樣的監獄，是中國熊貓的美式減肥之旅，是舊式的軍服和冷酷的軍人，是揮金如土的黑幫富商，是質朴善良卻吃不飽的人民。我們是如此在意西方媒體對我們的看法，所以《參考消息》銷量甚高；我們是如此在意好萊塢鏡頭里的中國是怎麼樣的，所以在失望後我們憤怒，我們謾罵，我們沮喪。
好像一個少年，用穿著球鞋的腳踢著街邊的垃圾桶，發泄著他看似有理卻其實無關緊要的憤怒：這一切，都是成長的煩惱而已。
何必在意好萊塢鏡頭里的中國是什麼樣呢？不需要在隕石撞擊地球之前拉著中國也發射核彈，我們知道自己能毀滅世界；不需要讓蝙蝠俠在香港跳來跳去，我們知道自己有摩天大廈；不需要一個外國導演的感動，我們知道在2008年的5月，汶川、映秀、北川閃耀著怎樣的光輝，那光輝足以在人類不長的歷史上留下璀璨的一點。不需要，其實我們從來都不需要好萊塢的肯定和西方世界的贊賞，我們有《南方周末》，有簡光洲，有盧廣，有×××，有×××（請隨意填空，只要可能被豆瓣刪除的人名都符合條件），我們能夠發現自己的問題，我們也有有勇氣說出這些問題的勇敢同胞。
但是——是的——沒錯，如同那個少年一樣，我們希望那肥大的校服能夠襯出自己一下子躥高了8公分的身材；我們希望那千篇一律的、人人一樣的發型能夠有點變化；我們希望自己成為同齡人中最有魅力的那一個——尤其是和西南角那個黑乎乎的表弟相比；當然，我們最希望的是那些前輩們能夠說一句：小夥子，不錯！
哪怕那些前輩們雖然有的富可敵國，有的學富五車，卻已老眼昏花，跟不上時代，也泡不到美眉了。
少年中國啊，少年中國，當我坐在電影院中，不可免俗地費力尋找你的身影時；當你的名字出現在那張地圖上，我驚呼出聲心中暗爽時；當我和所有觀眾一樣，看到直升機上那八一星徽會心一笑時，我們都是你的一部分——你的少年心性，你的故作深沉，你的不成熟，你的早熟，你的活力，你的不完美，你的沖勁，你的不自信，你的勇敢。
好萊塢的鏡頭里永遠不會有我們眼中的中國，我們眼中的中國只會出現在中國電影的鏡頭里。西方媒體的筆下永遠不會有真正的中國史，中國歷史的記錄者永遠使用漢字，那漢字從前存在於史官懷中的竹簡和市井小民的傳說中，今日則被坐在電腦前的每一個你和我敲擊，那些西方記者們漏掉的每一個歡笑和每一場苦難，都被我們忠實的記錄。
所以，無需費盡去尋找「中國方舟」了，無需為那一句「只有中國能在短時間內做到」而受用無窮，梁啟超在《少年中國說》中說中國「壯麗濃郁、翩翩絕世」，不是嗎？在那些白皮膚的老朽們已經爬到山頂的時候，等待著他們的只有下山的路，而攀爬未半的少年中國，抬起頭，前方是久違300年的絕頂風景。
好萊塢，不如遺忘中國吧，不當大反派，也無意成為救世主，更不想如你們鏡頭中俄羅斯的寡頭、沙特的王儲、印度的科學怪才那般臉譜化。如何編排你們的配角由你們自己高興，但真正的中國，存在在中國人當主角的電影里。
好吧，善良的中國人民都同意了，以後俺們的災難片里，也給你們美國人留一艘船。要減肥哦。
007 first episode, big villain Dr John Ure is a Chinese, the film released in 1962, October 5, after 15 days, the Sino-Indian border conflict broke out, four years after the Cultural Revolution in China to further its own closed, mystery The Red Storm from the East in general into the sky, swept the entire world, and those rages hoarsely roaring of the leftist students in fact did not know then what is taking place in China.
The Cultural Revolution in the past 33 years, the eyes of Westerners, China is like? This question has always been stirring up the hearts of all Chinese people, we would like a teenager, with people proud of the achievements, but also has shortcomings can not be ignored, edgy look forward, looking forward to all those who applaud achievements, and everyone put than those deficiencies. We look forward to every large in China's shadow, in every country there should be a big scene to find that a large red banner, and every wild notion of the disaster facing the world when they are looking forward to China's appears. We waited for the past what is it? Is worn the same brutal, such as concentration camps, prisons, the American-style Chinese panda journey to lose weight is a old-style military uniforms and the cold is a wealthy high-rolling gangsters, is simple but good enough to eat people. We are so concerned about the Western media's views on us, so "Reference News" sales of very high; we are so concerned about the lens inside the Hollywood kind of how China is, so we are angry after disappointing that we abuse, we are dismayed.
Like a teenager, wearing shoes with feet kicked street trash, vent plausible but in fact his anger does not matter: all these are just growing pains.
Why care about Hollywood lens, China is like? Do not need to pull before the meteorite hit the Earth in China also launched a nuclear bomb, we know that he can destroy the world; do not need to make Batman jumping in Hong Kong, we know that they have skyscrapers; do not need a foreign director moved, we know that in 2008 in May, Wenchuan, Yingxiu, Beichuan how brilliant shining, it is not bright enough to a long history in the human left bright point. No, in fact, we never need Hollywood's recognition and appreciation of the Western world, we have, "Southern Weekend", with Jane Kwangju, there is Lu Guang, there is × × ×, there is × × × (please feel free to fill in the blank, as long as may be 豆瓣remove the names are in line with conditions), we can find their own problems, we also have the courage to tell these brave fellow.
But - yes - yes, like that young, we hope that the hypertrophy of Chen Chu their uniforms to a sudden jump high 8 cm tall; we hope that the monotony, and everyone can be a bit like hair changes; We hope to become the most attractive peers of that one - especially with the southwest corner compared to that dark and cousin;, of course, our best hope is that those predecessors were able to say: boy, yes!
Even though some of those predecessors extremely wealthy, and some Xuefu five cars, already Laoyanhunhua, keep up with the times, it can not crush the foam.
Young China ah, young Chinese, when I was sitting in the cinema can not escape convention to effortlessly find your shadow pm; when your name appears on the chart, I exclaimed out loud when the heart Anshuang; when I, like all the audience and saw the helicopter was 81 when the star emblem of a knowing smile, we are all a part of you - your young minds, you Guzuoshenchen, your immaturity, your precocious, your energy, you do not perfect, you have momentum, you are not confident, you are courageous.
Hollywood's lens will never have our eyes China, we are in the eyes of China will only appear in the Chinese film lens. Western media's pen will never have a real Chinese history, Chinese history, the record will always use the Chinese characters, which used to exist in the Chinese historian bosom of the bamboo and the ordinary people of the legend, today was sitting in front of the computer for each one You and I tap those Western journalists who miss each and every one laugh a misery, have been our loyal records.
So, no need to expend a tremendous amount to look for "China's Ark", and no need for that one, "Only China can do in a short time" and is good enough for infinity, Liang in "Young China, said that" that China "magnificent full-bodied, Innocent Steps masterpiece", is not it? In those white-skinned decrepit are already Pashanding time, waiting for their only down the road, but climbing is not half of the Young China, raised his head, the front is a long-hoped-300 years of utterly scenery.
Hollywood might as well forget the Chinese bar, improper major opponent, but also not intended to be a savior, even if you do not want the lens in the Russian oligarchs, Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince, India's science geeks be as profiling. How to schele your supporting by your own happy, but the real China, there is the Chinese people when the main character of the movie.
Well, kind-hearted Chinese people have agreed, after the film was a disaster An Men, but also give you the Americans stay in a boat. Oh, to lose weight.
『肆』 電影英文影評
極地特快：
Rarely does a movie let you forget who you are and become the main character. This is one of those rare movies.
The movie starts out with a story that every Santa believer experienced. On Christmas eve a boy in Grand Rapids Michigan has reached the age where the statistical impossibility in the Santa story ( the size and speed of Santa's sleigh, the north pole being a barren wasteland) are causing him to doubt the big mans existence. Not knowing for sure the boy drifts into a deep sleep. At 11:55 PM the boy is awakened by the arrival of the Polar Express literally outside his front door. Going to investigate what is going on the boy meets the witty conctor of the Christmas eve train. (Tom Hanks)who informs him that the train is headed to the north pole so the kids can meet Santa Clause. Not totally sure that the train is going to the north pole but to curious to let it go the boy climbs on board. The adventure puts the boy in contact with a girl who is a natural born leader and who's belief in the Christmas magic couldn't be stronger. Other characters include a know it all socially awkward boy, a young underprivileged loner who has never experienced the magic of Christmas and a cast of other more mysterious characters such a a hobo ghost. Through the adventure the combination of great music, flawless animation and fantastic dialog really make you believe you are there and let you relive those days when you thought Santa Clause just might exist. The story ends on Christmas day with a line (narrated by Tom Hanks) about belief that brings back those kid on Christmas eve chills all over again. The themes of belief and friendship are a strong theme in the movie and part of the magic that brings you back to a time when you did believe.Its a great movie for children and alts alike and rekindles the Christmas magic that us alts lost many years ago.
『伍』 豆瓣排行前十的英文電影
2012,我是傳奇,初戀的回憶,冰上公主,人生搖控器,暮光之城,歌舞青春系列,當幸福來敲門,海神號.
『陸』 求英語電影英語的影評。
簡愛
Kent State University's school of theatre and dance performed a rendition of the classic, Jane Eyre this month. The show was a musical with all of the necessary elements to lift you from your seat and submerse youinto a society in nineteenth century England from the time the cell phone shut-off announcement was made until the last note at the curtain call. The recurring arches, darkened, soft lighting, and the use of a classic chorus to go along with them alluded that a sinister underbelly of social status and reputation were present in the performance.
One of the first things that an audience member noticed was the grandeur of the set. It was composed of a gothic-style foreground with rustic twigs of a root-like earthy appearance. There were grand arches for windows and entries as well. Also, the background was a large arch with the silhouette of roots. There were also two matching greek-style pillar arches on either side of the stage. They added a lot to many messages of the show. For one, they were grand structures that were barren inside which is much like Mr. Rochester himself. He was a man of high social stature but felt enslaved by his trick of a marriage and his grand yet incomplete (without a true love) home. The arches also suggest the importance of reputation with the same sort of fundamental grand image yet emptiness. The way that people are enslaved yet scramble to ascertain that solid image amongst their peers. The arches were almost inviting the audience to come inside to reveal their secret, the thing that was hidden deep inside that could send the structure crumbling in ruin.
『柒』 求一篇 電影 英文影評！
If you've ever been poor, this movie may be hard to watch. It depicts poverty in America in gut wrenchingly accurate ways. I've been as poor as Chris Gardner, and, like him, I've been poor among very rich people in the Bay Area while trying to work my way up.
Chris Gardner is a loving father and failing businessman. He is chosen for a competitive internship at Dean Witter, a stock brokerage. The internship, which offers Chris a very long shot at a better life, doesn't pay any salary. Chris has to live without a salary for six months while risking just about everything for that long shot gamble.
Chris is really smart. He can solve a Rubrik's cube in minutes. But, he's poor. Poverty, like an octopus, keeps trying to suck him down to the bottom, and make him stay there.
His car is towed. His wife walks out on him, leaving him with a five year old son. He is arrested for unpaid traffic tickets. He becomes homeless. He has to rely on a homeless shelter.
All this while, he must appear for work in the morning in a suit and tie, and be ready to charm some of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the Bay Area. These people take wealth so much for granted that two of them stiff him for cab fare.
Having lived through similar experiences, I cringed throughout this movie. My stomach hurt. I winced. I cried. I hugged my knees to my chest.
The movie is very accurate, but painful to watch. I hope a lot of rich people, who think that they understand poverty, see it.
This movie will be politically controversial. First of all, it doesn't touch the race issue with a ten foot pole. For example, when Chris appears to stiff a taxi driver for fare (it was really the rich white guy who failed to pay), the taxi driver never uses the "n" word. In real life, I think he probably would have.
Is the movie afraid to talk about race, or does it not want to? I don't know, but I know that some will protest the movie's not shoving race in the movie goer's face. I'm not one of those people. The movie's approach to race -- treating it as almost incidental -- worked for me. As a poor white person, I can tell you that poor white people face the same obstacles Chris did.
Second, does the movie sell the message that if you work hard, you will succeed, no matter what, and does that message tell the truth about success in America? I think that the movie is open to interpretation. Some will see it as an indictment of poverty in America. The scene of carefree rich people driving past the line to get into a homeless shelter is pretty devastating. Other people will become angry because they believe that the movie's depiction of hard work leading to rewards, in some cases, is too facile. I disagree, but that's what you'll hear.
Third, is this movie meant to chastise black men who abandon their children? Chris is a role model exactly because he moves heaven and earth to be a good father to his son. This will be debated back and forth.
The movie has a big philosophical statement to make, that has been lost on many reviewers, for example, Richard Schickel in TIME.
Chris is shown running throughout the movie. Remember the title of the movie: "The PURSUIT of Happiness." Chris places emphasis on "pursuit." Jefferson, when he penned the Declaration of Independence, did not promise Americans happiness, but only the right to pursue it. Chris says, at one point in the movie, paraphrase, "I am happy right now. It is a fleeting moment." We experience happiness in eyeblinks. The rest of the time we, like Chris, are chasing after it.
『捌』 英文電影影評
Julie & Julia is a 2009 American comedy-drama film written and directed by Nora Ephron starring Meryl Streep, Stanley Tucci, Amy Adams, and Chris Messina. The film contrasts the life of chef Julia Child in the early years of her culinary career with the life of young New Yorker Julie Powell, who aspires to cook all 524 recipes in Child's cookbook in 365 days, a challenge she described on her popular blog that would make her a published author.
Ephron's screenplay is adapted from two books: My Life in France, Child's autobiography written with Alex Prud'homme, and a memoir by Julie Powell documenting online her daily experiences cooking each of the 524 recipes in Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking, and she later began reworking that blog, The Julie/Julia Project。 Both of these books were written and published in the same time frame (2004–06). The film is the first major motion picture based on a blog。這是我最喜歡的一部電影之一，我在維基網路上找的資料，你根據那裡的資料改一改，至於觀點，你可以寫堅持自己的興趣和愛好這一方面，寫興趣是最好的老師什麼的，給你個鏈接
『玖』 幾部電影的英文影評
1.火柴人
Ridley Scott did an amazing job transfering this movie from the novel and delivers a wonderfully entertaining and enjoyable film.
Nicholas Cage's performance of a man riddled with tics and phobias deserves high praise as does Alison Lohman for being able to pull off being a 14 yr old despite actually being 10 years older. Sam Rockwell adds the finishing touches in what was most definitely an entertaining and mouth-dropping film.
Both Cage's and Lohman's on-screen chemistry fittingly akward for the film as Cage plays a con artist reunited for the first time with his daughter Lohman. Soon after, finding that raising a daughter and being a con artist are both too demanding on their own, he decides to integrate the two and teach his daughter some tricks of the trade. Rockwell rounds out the cast as Cage's con partner, delivering just the amount of comedic acting to balance out Cage's entertainingly interesting tics and movements on camera.
The film itself was very well done, providing a sound and believable story between father and daughter all through out the film and makes this film a delightful watch. By the end, Ridley Scott ties up all the loose strings and finishes up his film "Matchstick Men" with an ending that is sure to surprise and amaze.
Well delivered, well performed and highly pleasing, this is a film for anyone who enjoyed "The Sixth Sense" or "The Usual Suspects" but with a lighter and more comedic approach.
2.聞香識女人
Directed by Martin Brest Scent Of A Woman is a touching and at times very funny tale about friendship and the choices we have to make about what's right and wrong.
Young scholarship student Charlie Simms(Chris O'Donnell)is an honest and hardworking student at a private school,who takes up a summer job to pay for his plane fare home for Christmas.He becomes the helper over Thanksgiving Break to a blind retired Army officer.The tough and embittered Lt.Colonel Frank Slade(Al Pacino).
At first the two are at odds,then after arriving in New York (for what Charlie presumes is just a break they become friends and Charlie learns the real reason for the trip.The suicidal Colonel has come to the Big Apple to stay in a top hotel,have a great meal,drive a Ferrari meet a beautiful woman,see his brother and then shoot himself.
The heart of this film is the relationship between these two and the sheer desperation and despair of Slade(directed towards his blindness the result of a demonstration gone wrong).At times the films very funny especially ring the scenes featuring some very colourful language courtesy of the Colonel.There's fine support from a young Phillp Seymour Hoffman as a school friend of Charlie and James Rebhorn as Charlies hated headmaster.
Slightly cheesy at times this is still highly enjoyable and should have you laughing and crying in equal measure,Al won a long overe Oscar for best actor for his performance and who of us hasn't wanted to dance the Tango with the Colonel? This is well worth watching.
『拾』 適合寫影評的英文電影（推薦5個吧）
推薦電影復仇者聯盟，和恐怖電影死神來了，都是大片，最近有一部電影也很不錯，推薦你看，名叫無名之輩，好看的不得了。
該片圍繞一把丟失的老槍，講述了一對低配版的劫匪，一個落魄的保安，一個身體殘疾卻性格彪悍的毒舌女，這些「無名之輩」身上發生的一系列荒誕故事。
總之是一部優秀電影。