我想你說的應該是麥考利庫爾金演的《威威闊少爺》，當然這是國內的翻譯啦。英文是Ri￠hieRi￠h
影片介紹如下：
中文名稱: 威威闊少爺
別名: 財神當家 / 里奇里奇
類型：家庭 / 喜劇
發行時間: 1994年12月21日
導演: 唐納德·佩特瑞 Donald Petrie
演員: John Larroquette,Mike Bacarella,Ben Stein
地區: 美國
語言: 英語 / 拉丁語
片長: 95 min / Finland:90 min
發行公司：Argentina Video Home (AVH)
內容簡介: 改編自美國的流行漫畫《哈威》，描寫一個全世界最富有的小孩，年僅十歲，因父母乘飛機意外失蹤，繼承了大筆家產和事業。為了排解寂寞生活，他在街頭找來一群小搗鬼回家作客，共亨家中各種豪華的玩樂設備。壞舅舅一心謀奪家產，小財神運用各種稀奇古怪的武器和神通的電腦科技來對付舅舅，危急關頭，父母親回來了。
Ⅱ 《平民窟的百萬富翁》電影英語觀後感 200字
This is a story about one path leading to the final success is people's enrance and resolution,of course, some certain good luck also count. Let's give some further explanation about this path. First of all, as an indispensible element resulting in success, enrance plays an important role in the course of people's life.Directly speaking, it's hard for people to get to his destination without it.As for the resolution,just like the hero performing in this movie, determines his final fate. He has dream in his deepest heart, and he has the resolution to make it come true, eventually, by means of it, his dream has been realized. Above these elements mentioned above, good luck is also important.Sometimes, it can help push things forward. In all,we can not be of successful without our hard work.
Ⅲ 電影《百萬富翁》英文名
The Millionairess 確切地應該是這個
Ⅳ 百萬富翁 老電影
這個不叫百萬富翁，你查百萬富翁是查不到的，這個其實是是美國的著名作家馬克·吐溫的一篇著名的短篇小說，名字叫做《百萬英鎊》，你查百萬英鎊很容易就能查到了，優酷等一些網站都有這些電影，小說網路也很容易找到。
Ⅳ 高中英語課本中百萬富翁的電影叫啥名
百萬英鎊 馬克吐溫的
Ⅵ 百萬富翁電影簡介
電影簡介：
劇名：百萬富翁
類型：喜劇 / 劇情
地區：英國
導演：安東尼
編劇：喬治 伯納德 肖
別名：百萬富翁,百萬富婆
上映日期：1960年12月22日
劇情：
九歲的安東尼和七歲的達米安是一對兄弟，和英國每一位孩子一樣，他們每天上課下課、出去玩耍，日子過得平淡無奇。某一天在路上，他們撿到了一隻帆布背包。這是在一場銀行搶劫槍戰中掉落的背包，裡面足足裝有237000英鎊，但問題是，當時正直英鎊統一換成歐元的特殊時期，所以這些英鎊必須在一個星期之內花完。兄弟倆很快意識到了這個包的價值，他們商定，在沒有決定怎麼處理這筆錢之前，絕對不能告訴父親。
達米安是一個教徒，曾經得到過聖人的指點，常常把時間花費在學習如何成為一個聖徒上。他覺得精神上的享受比物質上的受用更加有意義。而哥哥安東尼是一個現實主義的實踐派，像每一個熱血的資本家一樣，他甚至已經開始為這筆錢開始考慮匯率、通貨膨脹和成本方面的問題了，還學會了用金錢去買新同學的友誼。一個認為錢是上帝的恩惠，所以應該用它救濟有需要的人，而另一個希望用它來享受人生，兄弟倆懷著不同的目的，開始為說服對方而努力。
Ⅶ 電影《百萬富翁》的英語介紹
Released in the US as Man With a Million, The Million Pound Note is a satisfying adaptation of a satirical short story by Mark Twain. Gregory Peck plays Henry Adams, an impecunious American living by his wits in London. Henry becomes the object of a wager between millionaire brothers Oliver and Roderick Montpelier (Ronald Squire and Wilfred Hyde-White), who want to find out if a man with a million pound note in his bank account could live comfortably for one month on the strength of that note--without ever spending a penny of it. When Henry is given the note and lets it be known that he has it, every courtesy imaginable is extended to him by hoteliers, restauranteurs, etc. Trouble brews when Henry uses the note's reputation to speculate on the stock market. When his creditors demand that he proce the note as an act of faith, Henry is unable to do so, whereupon pandemonium reigns--and the audience's laughter cascades.
Ⅷ 求《百萬富翁》電影，中文和英文字幕都有的種，我要下載地址，謝謝
是那個貧民窟的百萬富翁嗎
Ⅸ 有一部叫《百萬富翁》的電影嗎 急急急！！
外文名稱 The Millionairess (1960)
導演：Anthony Asquith
主演：
維托里奧·德·西卡Vittorio De Sica
彼得·塞勒斯Peter Sellers
Miriam Karlin
類型：愛情 / 劇情 / 喜劇
片長：90 min
國家/地區：英國
對白語言：英語
發行公司：20世紀福克斯電影公司
上映日期：1961年2月9日 美國
劇情：
富豪之家的兩兄弟，從銀行取出面額為一百萬英鎊的鈔票，籍以此驗證各自的理論。一個認為，這樣一張鈔票對窮人毫無價值；另一個認為，僅擁有這樣一張鈔票（不兌現），就可以過上上等人的生活。他們選中了一個身無分文的年輕人作為試驗品。於是，這個小夥子經濟上的突變，引起了生活方式的改變。他人...
Ⅹ 高分求《貧民窟的百萬富翁》的英文影評和中文翻譯
《貧民窟的百萬富翁》的得與失
《貧民窟的百萬富翁》很容易就抓住觀眾的心，靠「開心辭典」似的樣式去揭露印度的生活，確實新穎不少。當然，答題只是外套，所有的題目其實就是根據故事情節來編造，就像先射擊後畫靶心一樣，套用電影里的一句話：一切都是命中註定。只不過主宰者不是主持人，而是導演。
我聽聞印度貧富差距明顯、宗教矛盾沖突，也對其臟、亂、差略有了解，只是電影里毫無掩飾的展示出來時還是頗為震驚。我不知道其中描述是否是印度生活的真實情況，導演作為外國人，究竟是對印度文化不了解還是因為沒有顧慮而缺少限制，最終呈現的人生百態，使我們看到生活在底層的人們，遭受地位的下賤、生活的困窘和生命的威脅，人生的拼搏方向也就有了不同，最終導致命運殊途。這樣的題材其實已經不新鮮，但電影又有多少新鮮的題材可以挖掘？換一種方式、換一個背景描述，依然具有巨大的震撼力。
然而我們不得不承認，電影里所呈現的一些惡劣現象即使是在中國也並不鮮見：警察審判隨意毆打、流氓橫行無忌、歧視打工仔和窮人……所以我們沒有理由也沒有資格去鄙視一個超級大國的內部矛盾，只是我們或許是並不嚴重，或許是控製得好，僅此而已。從這部電影里讓我們看到了一個發展中國家在發展中的重重矛盾，對我們自己也是有啟發意義的吧！
電影的一大亮點是演員找得准，特別是三個主角，從小時到成年各是三個人扮演，卻給人感覺不出有何脫節。三個人長得很像，同時演技也能出色發揮，能夠讓人沉浸在劇中不致突然間的不適應，過度自然可見導演功力深厚。
"Slums millionaire" the gains and losses
"Slums millionaire" it's easy to seize the audience's heart, and relying on "Happy Dictionary"-like style to expose Indian life, and indeed many novel. Of course, the answer is only jackets, in fact all of the topics is on the basis to fabricate the story, just draw the bull's-eye after the first shooting, like, to borrow a word in the movie: Everything is predestined. Is not only to dominate the host, but the director.
I heard that obvious gap between rich and poor in India, religious contradictions and conflicts, but also their dirty, chaotic, know a little bad, but the movie is no cover up or when the display is quite shocking. I do not know whether the description of one of India are the real conditions of life, and the director as a foreigner, what is the Indian culture does not understand or because there is no worry about the lack of restrictions, finally showed life attitudes so that we can see at the bottom of people's livelihood, subjected to the low status of life and the lives of the threat of embarrassment, the fight of life and will have a different direction, which eventually led to the fate of no passers-by. In fact, this kind of subject matter is not fresh, but how many movies can be excavated fresh material? For a way for a background description, still has enormous power.
However, we have to admit, the movie presents some of the poor even if the situation is not uncommon in China: the police beating trial at random, lawless hooligans, discrimination against wage earners and the poor ... ... so we have no reason to go are not eligible for contempt internal conflicts of a superpower, but perhaps we are not serious, may be controlled well, and nothing more. From this movie we can see a developing countries in the development of the many contradictions of our own sense is it has inspired!
One highlight of the movie are the actors find a prospective, especially the three protagonists, from hours to alt indivials of all three are playing, but not what people feel out of touch. Three indivials looked like, at the same time acting can exert excellent, can not be immersed in the drama of not meet all of a sudden, over-the director of natural ability can be seen deep.
但這部電影結尾處理落入俗套，結尾被輕易猜出。整部電影缺乏對哥哥舍利姆性格的細致描述，以致他多次轉折稍顯突兀，特別是最後放走卡提來更是缺乏說服力。可以說，舍利姆死在一堆鈔票的浴缸里就是為了整部電影的「和諧」而做出的犧牲。另外，傑瑪和卡提來的愛情也沒有過多闡述，僅僅兩個人小時候在一起過一段時間，也沒見當中醞釀了多麼深厚的感情，成年後相見就情不自禁抱在一起，一句「我愛你」就可以私定終身，直接沖淡了圓滿結尾的感染力。這部電影可以再深刻的，但很可惜，導演為求得團圓而放棄了努力。
既然是一個圓滿的結尾，好好享受也未嘗不可，可電影結束後的一段歌舞，徹底把我從劇情中拉了出來。看著「傑瑪」和「卡提拉」隨著音樂狂放跳舞，讓我明白這一切不過是一場戲，他們不過是演員而已，所有的表達未必是真，所有的感情未必發自內心。可以說，最後畫蛇添足來了這么一段舞絕對是電影最大的敗筆，被寶萊塢固有模式完全糟蹋。
我突然想起反映中國一段歷史的《黃石的孩子》，導演同樣是外國人。平心而論，這部電影製作精巧，水準很高，可惜太過冗長最後讓人看得失去了耐心。然而，電影結束後，現實中當年那些孩子的倖存者講述電影主人公的真實形象，卻起到了很好的作用，甚至又能夠將觀眾拉回劇情之中。現實與虛構的平衡，真的需要好好把握才能夠令人認同。
But at the end of this movie fall into the conventional treatment, at the end was easy to guess. Seselj brother整部電影lack of detailed description of al the character, which he repeatedly turning slightly awkward, especially in the final release to more Mikati are unpersuasive. It can be said that Seselj al die at a pile of money for the bathtub is整部電影"harmonious" and make sacrifices. In addition, Gemma and Katy's love did not elaborate too much, just two young people together over time, but also not seen among the brewing for how deep the feelings of each other on an alt can not help but hold together, saying, "I love you "can be set for life private, direct to dilute the influence of a complete end. The film can be profound, but it is a pity that the director was seeking to abandon efforts to reunite.
Now that is a satisfactory end, enjoy it is not a bad idea can be a period after the end of movie songs and dances, from the story completely put me out of China and Latin America. Watching "Gemma" and "卡提拉" With the wild dance music, so I see all this is a drama, but they are just actors, all the expression is not necessarily true, not all of the feelings of his heart. It can be said that the final has come such a superfluous dance movies are the absolute biggest failure was inherent in Bollywood completely ruined.
I suddenly think of Chinese history to reflect the "Yellowstone of the child", the director is a foreigner same. In all fairness, the film proction of compact, high quality, but too long and the last people to see lost patience. However, after the movie, when in reality the child survivors of those movies about the true image of the heroine, but has played a good role, and even then will the audience be able to back into the story. The balance of reality and fiction, really need to make good use of it can only agree.