法律電影觀後感英文

A. 電影《肖申克的救贖》的英文觀後感

Atonement,是救贖之義。at one,指的是由一人所帶來的救贖，在基督教中指的是耶穌基督的犠牲，為人類帶來的救恩。而在肖申克的電影之中，主角最後的成功逃獄之前，為獄友帶來了各種恩惠，而他的逃獄也來自於多人的幫助，彼此為彼此在一群有罪之人聚集之地，成為了彼此的救贖。

事實上，主角Andy一開始是被陷害入獄的，所以救贖這個名詞，同時也帶有諷刺之義。無罪之人何來救贖。

B. 肖申克的救贖觀後感英文

肖申克的救贖觀後感英文：

I have always heard that "The Shawshank Redemption" is a very good film, when I have watched it; I thought the film is very successful.

In Shawshank prison, there was a man called Andy. He was innocent .So he was always looking for opportunities to jail. He and Reed were good friends. One day, he asked Reed to give him a small hammer. In the night, he began to burrow in the wall, trying to escape from the prison.

After nineteen years, he finally escaped.Later, Reed was released from the prison, and they lived a life of freedom.

In the film, Andy was free finally in 19 years because of maintaining a persistent heart. Andy told us what the hope of life was. As what was said in the film: Everyone has their own God, if you have to give up yourself, who will save you!

This film gave me a lot of touch and enlightenment, in real life, everyone will encounter many setbacks, at this time, what should we do? We need to be looking for hope, overcome difficulties and continue to move forward. In conclusion: As long as there is hope, we should expand the bright wings, flying in the vast sky.

譯文

當我看過《肖申克的救贖》時，我總是聽說它是一部非常好的電影；我認為這部電影很成功。

肖申克監獄里有一個叫安迪的人，他是無辜的，他一直在尋找出獄的機會。他和里德是好朋友。一天，他讓里德給他一把小錘子。到了晚上，他開始在牆上挖洞，試圖逃離監獄。

十九年後，他終於逃脫了。後來，里德從監獄獲釋，他們過著自由的生活。

在影片中，安迪在19年後終於自由了，因為他保持了一顆堅毅的心。安迪告訴我們生命的希望是什麼。正如電影中所說：每個人都有自己的上帝，如果你不得不放棄自己，誰會拯救你！

這部電影給了我很多感觸和啟示，在現實生活中，每個人都會遇到很多挫折，在這個時候，我們該怎麼辦？我們需要尋找希望，克服困難，繼續前進。總結：只要有希望，我們就應該展開明亮的翅膀，在浩瀚的天空中飛翔。

C. 電影守法公民的觀後感

關於電影守法公民的觀後感

用反正義的手段向司法制度挑戰——評電影《守法公民》

克萊德·謝爾頓是居住在費城某小鎮的一名研發人員，他有著美麗的妻子和可愛的女兒，生活幸福美滿。但這一切都被突如其來的災難所摧毀。某晚，兩個暴徒闖入他的家中，妻子和女兒都受到殘害。然而雖然證據確鑿，但由於司法程序的迂腐和尼克·瑞斯（傑米·福克斯 Jamie Foxx 飾）助理執行官的墮落，最終讓首犯克拉倫斯·多比（克里斯蒂安·斯多特 Christian Stolte 飾）因證據不足只得到10年徒刑。

本以為一切歸於沉寂，但10年後當年未了的風波再起。懷著巨大仇恨的克萊德開始籌劃展開報復，先是幹掉了當年的從犯阿米，接著他很快找到了邪惡無恥的多比，並對其進行殘酷的折磨與虐殺。克萊德的仇恨得到巨大的宣洩，但是他的復仇還未就此停止。他所針對的不只是那兩個暴徒，而是整個腐朽墮落的司法系統……

當今世界上主要有歐美法系和大陸法系，這兩大法系都存在漏洞，只是美國的歐美法系對於人權的保障多一些，有點寧可放過一千，不可錯殺一個的味道，在這樣的司法體制下，重證據，重程序的實質要多於對於事實本身的追求，美國的法律認為程序的非正義性一定會導致實質的非正義性，所以很多案件發生之後，法官、律師、陪審團都在調查程序、證人證詞、律師辯論上打轉轉，以求得還原案情本身的實際。

但是，人是有思維的動物，法律體系是死的，是有漏洞的，無論任何完備的法系，都能找到存在的漏洞可供人們鑽。

就守法公民這部電影而言，男主人公謝爾頓在妻子、女兒被虐殺之後希望得到來自法律的'保護還死者一個公平和正義。可是檢察官尼克帶來的結果卻是要被害人與殺人犯達成和解以其把殺人犯送進監獄坐10年牢。在沒有辦法的情況下，其實我覺得也是男主角迫於檢察官的壓力不得不做出了違心的選擇，同意與殺人犯達成協議。

但是，仇恨不會就此消除。10年後，兩名殺人犯都死於殘忍的虐殺，本來謝爾頓可以利用美國司法體系的漏洞逃脫法律的制裁，但是他沒有，他選擇了戰斗，與美國的司法體系抗衡。

他在監牢中殺死牢友，把自己轉入禁閉室，再從禁閉室逃出來趁機遠程殺害了審理案件的法官、費城司法部的大部分官員。最後在准備炸毀市政府大樓時，被檢察官尼克提前識破詭計，而最終難逃一死，導演在表現謝爾頓死的一段時，用了很漫畫的手法，把謝爾頓描繪成一個像耶穌一樣的神。大火在周遭燃燒，但是，沒有一點痛苦。

我倒是很希望結局是市政府大樓被炸，那樣就會表現得更加徹底的摧毀美國的司法制度。

可能是導演和編劇考慮到社會影響，總不希望人們都憑借反正義的暴力來維護自己的公平正義吧，所以，導演選擇了讓檢察官勝出，這是我看這部電影的最大的遺憾。

amu:

除了宗教（當然還有邪教）和道德，世界上沒有多少法律制度主張私權伸張通過「以血還血，以牙還牙」的方式，但是所謂先進的制度設計，考慮的前提永遠是人的不確定性甚至是政府的偽善性，進而在程序上盡可能地保障實體正義的取得要排除掉或者減少惡性因素，說大點：自由是法律的最終目的，但法律作為手段更要保證自由要在不侵害他人合法自由以及社會普遍的自由，才能實現。在法學理論中，注意我強調的是法學領域，自由與正義的價值位階也是，自由是最高位階，正義次之。所以，法律的制度設計要追求一種最佳狀態，就是在保護人的合法自由的前提下最大限度地實現正義。

反觀，我們如今人人張口閉口就是正義，正義，正義。其實，每個人心中的正義都源自於自己對於自由的渴望與追求。所以，在法律層面，不可能完全地遵從所謂的實質正義，法律是有局限性的，當然這裡面也存在一個良法惡法的因素。那就是古往今來爭論不惜的一個論證：惡法是不是法，需不需要遵守？？？

但是，正如本片中所反映的，法本身只要是規范科學合理，本身沒有公正不公正，只是法的執行上存在人與政府的不確定性，當法所追求的正義與道德、人性甚至青春生命等發生了沖突時，我們如何來追求一種補救的正義呢？？單純依靠法律自然是不能的？？？他殺了你，你生命滅失，無法復仇，然後你的兒子基於情感與道德再殺了他，然後他生命滅失，他的兒子在如此輪回地殺你的兒子，周而復始，生命輪回，這是正義嗎？至少不是法所追求的正義，更不是法所認為能夠實現的自由。

所以，其實這就是一個人自己選擇的自由問題。人可以為善，也可以為惡，只要他願意接受相應的權責。立法、執法、司法人員違法導致了不正義，但要承擔責任，法律上沒有承擔的話，或許就有道德、宗教等其他層面的責任。一個社會、一個國家，如果違法者無責任，也無道德上的歸責，更無其他責任的話，那麼崩塌的可不只是一棟政府大樓。

F:

暴力不等於非正義，暴力更不等於反正義。

立論欠妥當。

法國大革命造就了令人羨慕的法國。

文明的理念正是通過暴力得以延伸，才造就了令人羨慕的歐美。

大和正是通過（民主文明的）暴力矯正，才進化為今日之令人敬佩的民族。

然而，

獨裁、寡頭、法西斯主義、軍國主義、共產主義、現代封建主義等等，也是必須通過暴力，才得以猖狂貽害和殘喘的……

故此，簡單批評、甚至定性暴力本身，是很粗淺的認識。

如果有能力理解美國憲法第二修正案，你就會明白用武器（第二修正案時代只有「槍z」，我在此放寬為「武器」）對抗暴政，其實是美國憲法賦予美國人民的基本權利。

所以，暴力及其工具本身並無先天過錯，對錯全在人的主觀和判斷。（同樣是對當權者的某種政策不滿，請自行對比一下本片主人公的判斷和挪威那廝的判斷）

所以，文明國家才想盡辦法提高人民素質；

所以，垃圾政權和神奇的國度才想盡辦法讓老百姓變得更蠢更聽話。

附一段摘錄：

美國的《獨立宣言》宣告：人人生而平等，經過被政府管理的人們認可並授予的政府權力才是正當的政府權力，人們為了保障人們的生命權、財產權和追求幸福的權利才建立政府，當政府違背這些目的時，人民有權利也有義務變更或廢除政府，並根據人民的需要建立新的政府。

那麼，人民如何使用權利廢除違背人民意願的政府？當時憲法起草人傑佛遜認為，只有百姓有持槍權才能將這種權利付諸實踐。美國憲法規定，任何條文可以根據將來的情況加以修改，但百姓自由持槍這一條絕對不能改，它被寫在了美國憲法第二條修正案當中：「人民持有和攜帶武器的權利不得侵犯。」

D. 求一篇《拯救大兵瑞恩》電影的觀後感，用英文.800字左右，真心謝謝啦，

第一篇：《拯救大兵瑞恩》

Saving Private Ryan
Saving Private Ryan is a film which was directed by Steven Spielberg. The two main charactrs are Captain John Miller,played by Tom Hanks, and private James Ryan,played by Matt Damon.
James Ryan is the fourth brother to be involed in the Second World War.His three brothers has already been killed, two of them in the D-Day landing in Normandy, the other in a battle in another part of the world.Their heart-broken mother receives the news about all her dead sons on the same day.The US army decides to send a groups of men into the French countryside to try to find the fourth brother.Captain Miller, a hero and the surviror of the Omaha Beach battle, is choosen to lead the rescue team of eight men.
The film opens with a 30-minute sequence of the invasion of Normandy, probably the most violent images of war ever shown in a film.We see the full horror of the war,and the chaos and the senseless waste of life.
Saving Private Ryan is an unforgettable anti-war film,and also a story of couerage and sacrifice.Spielberg has made a lot of good films, but he has never made one with such a strong message.And the message is simple---We want peace,we don't want war.

E. 5篇100字左右的英文電影的觀後感，要用英語啊

"The Count of Monte Cristo" Movie Review （基茄銷督山顫虛游譽螞伯爵－－電影觀後感） Imprisoned for a crime he didn't commit, torn away from his family and his fiancée, Edmund spends 15 years locked away in a damp prison, most of which is spent learning fighting and survival skills from a wizened old criminal, played with gentle humor by Richard Harris. Meanwhile, Fernand and Mercedes marry (that always happens in romance novels) despite the fact that she never got over her love of Edmund. The plot thickens with Edmund's escape from prison and his secret reemergence as the dashing, and wealthy, Count of Monte Cristo. The fight scenes are amazingly fluid, swordplay seeming to come naturally to both Guy Pearce and Jim Caviezel. The film also features a humorous performance from the talented Luis Guzman as a man devoted to the Count/Edmund. While some of the lines used in both the prison scenes and the "buddy" scenes between Guzman and Caviezel are a bit unbelievable (there occasionally seems to be a tad too much of the new millennium in the way they speak), most of the scenes are true to the times and the scenery and sets are authentically breathtaking.

F. 求電影《Double Jeopardy》即《致命追緝令》 英文感想 英文簡介 觀後感什麼的 越詳細越好，謝謝各位 謝謝

Double jeopardy is a proceral defense that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same, or similar charges following a legitimate acquittal or conviction. At common law a defendant may plead autrefois acquit or autrefois convict (a peremptory plea), meaning the defendant has been acquitted or convicted of the same offense.
If this issue is raised, evidence will be placed before the court, which will normally rule as a preliminary matter whether the plea is substantiated, and if it so finds, the projected trial will be prevented from proceeding. In many countries the guarantee against being "twice put in jeopardy" is a constitutional right; these include Canada, India, Mexico, and the United States. In other countries, the protection is afforded by statute law.

it very good , i like it very much, thank u for reading.

G. 電影觀後感用英文怎麼說

電影觀後感用英文怎麼說？這個問題似乎暗示著一種對電影的反思和評價需要通過英文表達。在英文中，我們可以使用「movie review」或者「film review」來描述這種形式。電影觀後感是一種常見的文化產品，它通常包括對電影的描述、評價以及個人感受。通過撰寫電影觀後感，人們可以分享自己的觀影體驗，同時也可以幫助其他觀眾更好地了解電影的內容和風格。

一篇好的電影觀後感通常會包含幾個部分。首先，簡要介紹電影的基本信息，例如導演、主演、上映時間等。接著，可以詳細描述電影的情節、角色發展以及導演的風格。然後，基於個人的感受，對電影進行評價，可以是正面的，也可以是負面的。此外，還可以提出一些個人的觀點，例如對電影主題的理解或者對某些情節的看法。最後，可以總結自己的感受，給出整體評價。這種結構有助於讀者更好地理解作者的觀點，同時也讓觀後感更加條理清晰。

值得注意的是，電影觀後感的寫作不僅僅是描述電影，更重要的是通過個人的感受和評價來傳達自己的見解。因此，在撰寫時，應該盡量保持客觀公正，同時也要敢於表達自己的真實感受。這樣，不僅可以讓讀者更好地理解電影，也可以促進不同觀點之間的交流和討論。

H. 求一篇英文電影的觀後感

電影《肖申克的救贖》The ShawShank Redemption 觀後感。
Hello, everyone, my topic today is 「The ShawShank Redemption」. Prison as a special place for prisoners is part of the society. It』s special because of its depriving the freedom of the prisoners. The prisoners in that situation are more sensitive to freedom than people in other situations. When they lost it, they found that it was so necessary to them that they looked forward to regaining it. By contrast, the people lived in the political society were interested in courting the fame and gain. They lost most of their inherent character. They put their soul into the fence of their own. They gave up the freedom of thinking. They forgot their original dream. The demands of the spirit were materialized to a position or some numbers.

A prisoner spent almost all the life in the prison. When he got the parole, which was applied for many years but without reply, he didn』t feel happy, but sad. He wanted to go to the prison again. He wanted to live in the place he knew. In the prison, he was a key who had knowledge and position. But when he went out of the prison, he found he was only an old man without anything. He couldn』t finish his work quickly because his hands had suffered the arthritis. Unfortunately, he even had no power to struggle. As a result, He chose to suicide because it was the only thing he could do by himself.

Red was a superman in the prison. He could find things that weren』t in the prison at all. But when he went out of the prison, he could do nothing. He lived in the fear and felt so lonely. He loved freedom but he couldn』t realize his value. In this film, Red said, 「Hope is a dangerous thing. Drive a man insane. Nothing will take place here. You』d better get used to the idea. These walls here are kinds of funny. At the beginning, you hate them, then you will get used to them. As time passes, you will depend on them. That's institutionalizing.」

In this film, Andy as the symbol of the hope lived in the prison for 20 years. He remained his dream all the time. On one hand, he looked forward to getting freedom. On the other hand, he believed that he was innocent of the murder. The real reason was his profound thought about hope. In his opinion, hope is a good thing, maybe the best thing, and no good things ever die. It makes a strong man save himself, and a great man save another one. According to this idea, the life in prison for 20 years did not made Andy give up the hope, but made him comprehend the meaning of the life. In fact, hope is a mood without ambition but it really exists.

The sky, the sea and the beach compose a romantic picture. When Andy and Red, two weather-beaten friends, saw each other again in the island, all hardship of 20 years made Andy tougher and their friendship get harder as the same.

最好你自己也去看看，根據你的感受修改下會表現更好！這實在是一部很Man的電影，拘於困境，受盡委屈卻不屈不撓，對自我的拯救！

I. 急求電影《七宗罪》英文觀後感一篇~~~英文簡單一些，本人英語水平不是很高謝謝!!

Seven," a dark, grisly, horrifying and intelligent thriller, may be too disturbing for many people, I imagine, although if you can bear to watch, it you will see filmmaking of a high order. It tells the story of two detectives - one ready to retire, the other at the start of his career - and their attempts to capture a perverted serial killer who is using the Seven Deadly Sins as his scenario.

As the movie opens, we meet Somerset (Morgan Freeman), a meticulous veteran cop who lives a lonely bachelor's life in what looks like a furnished room. Then he meets Mills (Brad Pitt), an impulsive young cop who actually asked to be transferred into Somerset's district. The two men investigate a particularly gruesome murder, in which a fat man was tied hand and feet and forced to eat himself to death.

His crime was the crime of Gluttony. Soon Somerset and Mills are investigating equally inventive murders involving Greed, Sloth, Lust and the other deadly sins. In each case, the murder method is appropriate, and disgusting (one victim is forced to cut off a pound of his own flesh; another is tied to a bed for a year; a third, too proud of her beauty, is disfigured and then offered the choice of a call for help or sleeping pills). Somerset concludes that the killer, "John Doe," is using his crimes to preach a sermon.

The look of "Seven" is crucial to its effect. This is a very dark film, the gloom often penetrated only by the flashlights of the detectives. Even when all the lights are turned on in the apartments of the victims, they cast only wan, hopeless pools of light.

Although the time of the story is the present, the set design suggests the 1940s; Gary Wissner, the art director, goes for dark blacks and browns, deep shadows, lights of deep yellow, and a lot of dark wood furniture. It rains almost all the time.

In this jungle of gloom, Somerset and Mills tread with growing alarm. Somerset intuits that the killer is using books as the inspiration for his crimes, and studies Dante, Milton and Chaucer for hints. Mills settles for the Cliff Notes versions. A break in the case comes with Somerset's sudden hunch that the killer might have a library card. But the corpses pile up, in cold fleshy detail, as disturbingly graphic as I've seen in a commercial film. The only glimmers of life and hope come from Tracy (Gwyneth Paltrow), Mills' wife.

A movie like this is all style. The material by itself could have been handled in many ways, but the director, David Fincher ("Alien 3"), goes for evocative atmosphere, and the writer, Andrew Kevin Walker, writes dialogue that for Morgan Freeman, in particular, is wise, informed and poetic. ("Anyone who spends a significant amount of time with me," he says, "finds me disagreeable.") Eventually, it becomes clear that the killer's sermon is being preached directly to the two policemen, and that in order to understand it, they may have to risk their lives and souls.

"Seven" is unique in one detail of its construction; it brings the killer onscreen with half an hour to go, and gives him a speaking role. Instead of being simply the quarry in a chase, he is revealed as a twisted but articulate antagonist, who has devised a horrible plan for concluding his sermon. (The actor playing the killer is not identified by name in the ads or opening credits, and so I will leave his identity as another of his surprises.) "Seven" is well-made in its details, and uncompromising in the way it presents the disturbing details of the crimes. It is certainly not for the young or the sensitive. Good as it is, it misses greatness by not quite finding the right way to end. All of the pieces are in place, all of the characters are in position, and then - I think the way the story ends is too easy. Satisfying, perhaps. But not worthy of what has gone before.