居家男人電影英文觀後感

㈠ 〈居家男人〉中英文觀後感

首先是人應該怎樣活著。主人公是一個可以上得了廳堂，下得了廚房的男人。有點佩服。單是「上得了廳堂」這一點對自己來說，還不知要奮斗多少年。其實吃苦倒沒什麼，不經歷風雨那能見彩虹？就怕忙忙碌碌一陣子，而結果卻是碌碌無為一輩子。不是沒有這種可能，而是很有這種可能。但是主人公卻看到了彩虹，睿智後面是魄力，過人的膽識使得他真正成為了人上人。

但是人大了，再小就難了，也就是難以下廚房了。劇中主人公（傑克）盡管以一種夢幻、體驗的方式從一個叱吒的老闆變為了賣輪胎的職員，但還是演繹得惟妙惟肖。（當然，如果說這是演戲，是人為的假定，以此叫真，那就沒有討論的必要了）人就應該能大能小。但是說時容易做時難，處在一定高度了，也就開始處處顯出一種姿態來——自命的，吹捧得。自絕與群的人所謂的同舟共濟都是空話。也難免，人的眼一般是往上看得。進步的光往往會泛化前進的路，尤其是對於自己再低頭去做那些……

然而，高處不勝寒。享受了他人羨慕所帶來的「溫暖」，也就難免要經歷名利的孤單。這就是本文所要探討的第二個問題——人在活著，但是究竟是為了什麼在活？為錢、為名、為利……或許這僅僅是人生的一個階段所要求的。在劇中。傑克以自己的實際行動向我們告白——人活著是為了人，為了自己的家人；或有餘力，兼及他人。這不是什麼利己主義，這就是人之為人的所在。

在嘈雜的社會中，在險惡的江湖後，回到家——妻子的一杯濃茶，女兒的一生——Dad,甚至是家犬的擁抱……一切都是溫暖的，一切都是自然的。尤其是看到小boy在成長，多麼可愛；撲閃的大眼睛分明有自己的影子。

看到自己的後代在嗷嗷哺育中成長，看到大女兒在成長中懂事，那份撒野的心忽然又收了回來——這是我生命的延續，而正是在延續中我看到了自己生命的全部，自己生命的重生。

難道還有什麼比生命永恆更讓人期待的嗎？

㈡ 《居家男人》的英文介紹及評論

Brief Introction:

Jack Campbell (Academy Award® winner Nicolas Cage) is a single, wealthy Wall Street trader living the high life in New York City. All that magically changes one morning when he wakes up in a suburban New Jersey bedroom with a wife (Tea Leoni) he never married and two kids he never had - the life he would have led if he had made different choices as a younger man. Find out what it takes for a single-minded businessman to become The Family Man in this wonderful comedy about second thoughts and second chances.

Nicholas Cage is one of the busiest and most versatile "A List" Hollywood actors, turning his hand to action, drama and comedy.

Family Man is a romantic comedy starring Cage alongside Tea Leoni. Cage chooses his career over his girlfriend Leoni and walks away from her at the airport despite her pleas for him not to leave. Thirteen years later, he is a hugely successful businessman, about to close a multi-billion dollar merger with a rival company. After an encounter with a mysterious character, he wakes up next to Leoni, finding that he has been married to her for thirteen years, with two children and a large slobbering dog...

Review:
The Family Man is a generally decent winter romance that features Nicolas Cage as a corporate, Wall Street hot-shot with "everything" he could possibly want, until his world is turned upside-down when he wakes to the a glimpse of the life he would have lived, had he married long-time college girlfriend Téa Leoni.

The family, the children, the pets, the "job." In other words, it is another variation and combination of A Christmas Carol, and Run, Lola, Run or Sliding Doors or Twice Upon Yesterday or Me Myself I. Cage's initial reaction to the surreal situation seems irrational. Since he has retained all the information of his real life over, who hasn't had some sort of dream like this? Is this the way you act in your dreams? Hardly, I would think; I would imagine that it would prompt the person to do a bit of exploring, especially considering that it seemed so unreal. But luckily enough, the story builds enough to it to leave some room for margin error. The Family Man is well acted; I usually like Cage, and when he merits and demerits his perceptions in the movie, it is all justified. Leoni amazingly is natural and affecting. She comes across very equanimic and real. With its nice cast, it showers you in the romantic shards that are desirable around this time of the season. On the downside, too often, many of the characters receive an introction and are shown functioning in a regular fashion, and then they're completely forgotten and abandoned. And the dialogue was too austere to be believable. Unfortunately, we don't speak that direct and straightforward; it's rarely the case, and director Brett Ratner (Money Talks and Rush Hour) doesn't have the strength or maturity to handle the dictum like David Mamet or Whit Stillman. Only the last quarter of an hour, when Cage realizes that the glimpse must come to an end, does The Family Man noticeable decline. Still, it's a good romantic fantasy. (One fetid diaper-changing scene provides surprising reaction, disgust and cause to look away from the screen. That's scary considering how we can tolerate heads exploding, guts being ate, and carnal, pornographic sex, and yet we get a little messy poop and it's head turning.)

㈢ 居家男人的影片評論

What if you made different choices? What if you said yes, instead of no? What if you got a second chance?

㈣ 居家男人電影英語觀後感120詞

Something about 「The family man」
Jack Campbell, a successful and talented businessman, is happily living his single and busy life. He has everything, he thinks. One day he wakes up in a new life where he didn't leave his college girlfriend for a London trip. He's married to Kate, lives in Jersey and has two kids. He, of course, desperately wants his life back which he has worked 13 years for, rather than works as a tire salesman at Big Ed's. And most importantly he doesn't want to wake up in the morning with kids jumping on the bed. However, as time goes by, day by day he's more confident with his new life and starts to find out what he once ignored, turning out money's good to have but that's not everything.
During the whole film, what impresses me most is the lovely girl, who figures out that her father has changed into someone completely strange. Though she is scared ,she still wants to defend her brother against the 「alien」. She is so smart and brave ,and we must admit that children are adorable spirits of sensitivity and imagination.
At the end of the film, Jack goes back to his original life, making every effort to retain his love. According to the usual mode of films, it』s not difficult for us to infer the old-fashioned ending-----prince finds his true love and live a happy life with the princess. What a beautiful fairy tale.
However, to be honest, I don』t endorse this movie. Well,"The unexamined life is not worth living." Brett Ratner puts this theme into The Family Man, but neither of the parallel lives led by the main character is shown to be flawless, I think. I would rather take them as two different indivials after they make their choices. Choice can change one』s life ,environment can grind one』s edges and corners, failure can kill one』s will ,but what they cannot change is the character of a person. This character, or nature, is formed after our childhood. So I don』t want to judge the lives of two Jack which is better. I just want to say,
every one has his own life.
Original Jack ,as he said, makes perfect plans to everything, never doubts, never regrets. He is satisfied with his life, working hard without any loneliness. But he is thrown into another world, which is full of daily trifles. He is shown to another Jack』s memories, photos, videos, forced to received other』s life style. He , as well as us ,is brainwashed into believing that the man should have been like this. But why? Who prescribed? Because it accords with the warm imagination of the majority ? Isn』t it unfair to him?
At the beginning of the movie, the successful Jack is still single after many years. Can』t he even find a woman to marry except Kate? In the view of his status and capability, it』s impossible. It just shows a fact that he doesn』t want to get married, starting from the airport. Compared to love others, he prefers wealth, status, freedom, all the time.
This is the first Jack, an out-and-out businessman ,maybe he is indifferent, but he is successful.
Well, there is another part in the Parallel world makes me feel ridiculous. Jack managed to get executive position through his eloquence and confidence from his previous boss. He looked forward to a better life together with his family, while Kate started to brainwash, saying I can scarified everything -----the house, good school for children , brilliant career, just because of love, as if their life would have been totally destroyed by a superior apartment.
Every one has his limit of ability, and it』s happiness to recognize it and satisfy. But when you have the ability to enjoy a cozy life, you insist stay in the slums. This not called happiness.
I feel sorrowful. We all have dreams, why is it noble only when the dream is about love and family, why not career? Even somebody may have sympathy to the first Jack: you are certainly wealthy and capable, but you lack friendship, love and family. You can just own one-night stand instead of a wife. Haha~ In fact ,Jack has his daily circle and life style----delicious food, wonderful trip, beautiful girls, and most important, career. I can』t understand ,why happy life must be ordinary. This is another hidden rule imposed on our mind: the rich know nothing about love and happiness. Ordinary happiness of family life is destined to be destroyed by great ability of work. But that is not a truth, not necessarily.
Let all 「what if 」 go to hell and live as you choose,I just want to say. As long as you select, please be faithful to the heart, have no doubt, and never regret.

㈤ 尼古拉斯凱奇的電影《居家男人》影評

選擇是可以改變一個人的一生，環境是可以磨鈍一個人的稜角，失敗是可以消磨一個人的意志，但是，什麼都無法改變一個人的性格。這個性格，或者說本性，經過童年少年之後，就基本完成定性了。

所以當鳳凰生在雞窩中，會壓抑，會掙扎，會努力展翅飛向天空。或者帶著折斷的翅膀，緩慢而痛苦地死在不屬於自己的地方。

這個例子並不試圖比喻兩個傑克兩種生活孰優孰劣，只是說，人各有命。而很多事情，都是出自人自己的選擇，而這個選擇，是已經定型的本性引導的。

但是沒錯，我仍然想說，頭一個傑克是鳳凰。

這不是一部拍得很差的電影，事實上沖著凱奇和片中的小姑娘就不該給那麼低，我這個兩星是給劇本的，因為有個巨大無比的bug，就是頭一個傑克和後一個傑克完全不是同一個人。

頭一個傑克，像他說的，凡事有規劃，從不懷疑，從不遺憾。成功之後也沒見他有多麼孤獨，他滿意自己的生活狀態。硬是要說他不懂人世之美，把他丟進柴米油鹽尿布堆里。給他看很多後一個傑克的回憶，照片，錄影帶，等等，不斷給傑克洗腦。同是也對觀眾洗腦，說，看，這個男人應該是這樣這樣的，多麼好。

可是他為什麼就應該是這個樣子？因為符合大部分人對生活的溫馨想像？對幸福定義的普遍認同？因為這個傑克更好？

不熟悉嗎？這種感覺。從小到大就有很多人告訴你，你應該是個什麼樣子，我們希望你是個什麼樣子，什麼樣子會讓你生活得更好。做個好孩子，好男人，看，你也可以做到這么好。這樣很快樂不是么？

好，把你自己想像成傑克試試看。強制你從第一個到第二個，你會喜歡么？你喜歡？好。那麼帶著這喜歡的心情，現在強制你從第二個到第一個，你喜歡么？總之，你被告知你其實不是現在這樣的，你應該是那樣那樣的，你需要改變。你改么？

記住這個游戲的規則是：需要改變的，是你了解並認同的那個你自己。改變的方向，是別人說的另一個「你」。沒有好壞優劣之分，只是不同。

有趣么？你玩兒么？

影片一開始就強制設定了一個潛規則：去倫敦，離開一年，倆人就一定會掰——可是請想一想，為什麼？如果換兩個人也會這樣么，還是說天下所有的情侶都這樣？好吧，兩人的確掰了。轉眼十三年後，拍到功成名就的傑克還是單身一人。除了凱特他就遇不到可以娶的女人了？就他的身份地位而言，不可能，只能說明他不想結婚。比起愛別人，他更愛自己。財富。地位。自由。從機場開始就是。

這才是第一個傑克。

好吧，假象生活中還有一段。他在輪胎店裡遇到了大boss，於是靠口才和自信爭取到了主管的工作。他想要更好的生活，在帶凱特吃大餐的時候，他吃一口美食幸福地閉上眼睛說懷念這個滋味，他現在會愛了，會在愛自己的同時愛自己的家庭了，他想帶自己的家庭一起過好日子，不用把超市的蛋卷當做天下美食。

每個人都有自己的能力上限，認識到並知足是幸福的，比如你偶爾奢侈一下的話能買一套二手的西服，那麼穿上它的時候是幸福的，ok一點問題沒有。但是當你有量身訂做屬於自己西服的能力，卻只能穿二手的時候，這不叫幸福。

傑克知道自己的能力，他試圖改變這一切，然而凱特開始洗腦，說著本來在這里整個家庭能夠如何如何幸福，最後做出犧牲的姿態，說因為愛你，我可以犧牲還有122次貸款的房子，孩子的好學校，習慣了的生活……

她的男人展開了翅膀，她卻覺得自己是在為了愛委曲求全。這個角色本身就過分單薄，她總是顯得可怕的樂觀，開朗，積極向上，有時候簡直近乎沒心沒肺，比如吵架之後馬上又能巨開心，她男人都失魂落魄到那樣了她還不曾察覺。她的幸福，是男人為了她不斷犧牲，她也回報以巨大犧牲（如果不嫁給你，我也許也會很牛逼雲雲。雖然的確也可能是。）她的幸福，是男人浪漫無比，生日時候要唱歌，做愛之前要說我愛你。這也都ok沒有問題，除了一點：傑克不是這樣的人。縱使洗腦完畢，他仍然想要飛起來，他不想在超市買袋鹽都要想想貴賤，不想變成一個「順其自然，得過且過」的人。雖然後來說他變了，按照電影劇本來說。

這很悲哀。每個人都有夢想，為什麼當這夢想是愛情和家庭會覺得高尚，而是事業時就那麼不堪？甚至很多人會同情之就像同情劇中的傑克：沒錯你很富有很能幹很牛逼但是哈哈你不懂得友情愛情家庭你很孤獨你只有露水情緣沒有女人真正愛你連聖誕節你都得一個人過你甚至沒有人情味大過節的叫人上班開會因為你自己就不懂情——我最滿意的，就是開頭並沒有把傑克拍成一個可憐兮兮的高處不勝寒的男人。事實上，他有自己的生活圈子和方式，美食，旅行，女人，事業。並且，很滿意。

此片卻要對一個曾在Kenai河中泛過舟，在西班牙參加過奔牛節，在Mojave沙漠高空跳過傘的男人說，no，no，no，這不叫幸福，幸福是和一幫鐵哥們兒滿身臭汗地打保齡球。

我更不能明白的是，幸福生活，為什麼就一定要是平凡的。這是另一個強制設定的潛規則：有錢人不懂幸福。平凡的幸福家庭生活，會被強大的工作能力毀壞，當你焦頭爛額地賣一堆輪胎回到家，會因為一個蛋卷幸福，但當你自信滿滿地完成一次上億的並購回家，你那可憐的太太就不知道該怎麼和你一起分享這樣巨大的成功了，因為一個蛋卷不能滿足你了，而她只知道蛋卷。她害怕，害怕你能力太高，就拘不住了。吃完蛋卷等孩子睡了做愛是幸福，喝完香檳慶祝後做愛也幸福，但沒有前者境界高，何況有錢人都是萬惡的，他們一定會養小蜜，包二奶，太太只能在家裡修指甲養狗養小白——這種狀況，已經成為宇宙真理了么？是先有這種狀況再有此潛規則，還有在這種潛規則說法下推波助瀾萬人默納下心安理得狀況頻出？

潛規則，很多時候只是當事人的借口，非當事人的意淫。它不是真理，不是必然。不是所有人都能理解什麼叫做隨機與偶然，更不能了解什麼叫做決定論。

按理說這片應該把會選擇飛去倫敦的人改造成一個會從倫敦飛回來的人，但是至少我不是。不是我會選擇飛去倫敦，而是到劇終，我仍然認為傑克應該選擇去倫敦。

讓一切what if見鬼去吧，如果有個上帝的使者真的百忙之中來幫你what if，請告訴他，謝謝。因為你的方向已定。即使在這個點發生偏折，也一定會在之後的某個點，再次偏折，拐回。生活永遠是自己選擇的，只要在選擇的時候，對自己的內心忠實。絕不懷疑，也絕不遺憾。

㈥ 有什麼美國溫馨電影，像「居家男人」之類的

尼古拉斯凱奇的《居家男人》的確是部溫馨的片子《諾丁山》 《確定地可能》 《幸福終點站》 《天使之城》

㈦ 關於尼古拉斯凱奇電影《居家男人》的問題

先留個名 今天晚上去看一下再回答你
看過了我的想法不一樣 沒錯黑人的任務就是測試這些凡人，男主角是因為經過了他的測試，他在便利店挺身而出，所以黑人給了他一個體驗的機會。
而女孩沒有把握這個機會，所以她應該是得不到這個機會……

㈧ 誰幫我寫一篇《居家男人》電影的觀後感，要求500字以上，前200字總結電影，後面點評電影和對電影的

放心吧,沒有哪個是傻冒給你寫

㈨ 居家男人電影結局，居家男人好看嗎 評價怎麼樣

《居家男人》推薦給拼盡了青春換取所謂成功，在摩天大廈下孤單，在地鐵人海中擁擠，在泡吧喧囂後落寞，把愛情與回憶交付拼搏的人們；可能你在寬敞的辦公室內享受著成功的歡愉，可能你在邁向成功的路上歡欣鼓舞，也或許最慘的是你在茫茫黑暗的絕望中品味苦澀，都請你看看這部電影。看完之後會發現，有時候「成功」並不是我們所想像中的那樣，我們對於「成功」的定義往往沒有追隨自己的內心，而是盲從了社會的庸俗標准。
而片中讓人感到溫馨而快樂的是，Jack在可能的另一種生活狀態中，在Kate以及可愛的孩子Annie and Josh的陪伴下，又去追尋曾經的美好與平靜。因為此時Jack明白了，真正的幸福來自內心的平靜，而不是優越與炫耀，也不是金錢與地位，或許忙碌的我們應該看到，至少，獲得那一下午的全身心的放鬆，與品嘗自己擁有的。那裡，應該有甜蜜的味道。
當幸福與成功需要你抉擇的時候，你一定要問問你自己，你想不想說出那句：I choose us.