七罪宗電影觀後感

Ⅰ 電影《七宗罪》觀後感及疑點

我的理解就是：光頭完成了他的所謂的「使命」
在我們看...一直到他自首的時候，光頭分別殺了5人：暴食、貪婪、傲慢、傲慢、及色慾，這樣我們會疑惑，還有：妒忌、暴怒呢？
這是光頭的一個圈套，其實光頭被年輕警察殺死是因為光頭認為自己就是「妒忌」老警察看出了他的圈套，所以一直跟年輕的警察說：你殺了他，他就贏了！
當然「暴怒」就是年輕警察，他殺了光頭，按法律，他也是犯死刑。
剛好七個...

Ⅱ 《肖申克的救贖》評分為豆瓣第一，為什麼它的評價這么高

自20世紀以來，電影行業飛速發展，出現了大批的優質電影，風格迥異、各不相同。有的反應人性，有的充滿正能量，但是豆瓣評分第一的卻是一部關於越獄題材的電影《肖申克的救贖》，所以為什麼它的評價這么高？或許很多人心裡都有這個疑問。

其實影片本身就是一種精神救贖，教導人們進行自我救贖。所以能讓觀眾產生這種自我救贖的影片憑什麼不能稱為是一部優秀的影片？總有人問它為什麼評價這么高，可每一位觀影人的評價難道不足以證明事實嗎？難道這部影片獲得的成就不能證明嗎？第一名不虛傳！

Ⅲ 七宗罪觀後感200字就行 用心理學闡述

《七宗罪》講述了老探員薩默塞特和年輕的警察米爾斯追查連續殺人案的故事，而殺人犯John是一個變態的宗教殺手，自己認為自己是神派來的使者，代表神以七宗罪的來懲罰世人。老探員薩默塞特則看多了太多的殺人案件和了解很多犯人的性格，在偵查案件事表現出冷靜，特別是最後車子里，一句話都沒有說，對於犯人解釋表現出習慣以至於不去和犯人反駁。年輕的警察米爾斯一心想抓到犯人，但由於自己的沖動，被犯人誘導去犯罪，最終由執法者變成犯罪人。
影片的john不是沒有文化，相反是受過高等教育，智商也極高，但反而卻成為了危害社會的人。由於受到宗教的影響，加上社會上的種種原因，犯人就用七宗罪來衡量這個社會，對犯有七宗罪之一的人連續殺害，但對自己所犯的罪，卻只有七宗罪之一的嫉妒，完全沒有對自己殺人而感到罪惡，自己認為自己是替神辦事，幫助社會。影片中的john是典型的反社會人員，他們的人格扭曲，開始異化，脫離現實社會思想。他想用七宗罪來告誡世人，但自己卻製造人去犯七宗罪，而不是去感化和告誡，把罪行強加於別人，只顧及自己的計劃，只是用自己的角度來看一個人的罪行，他所說的罪行其實都是他自己想的，沒有用社會角度來衡量他的罪惡程度。所以犯人john是一個嚴重的偏執狂，思想過度誇張。
至於年輕的警察米爾斯，最終無法控制自己的情緒而私自殺死犯人。作為一個警察，卻無法控制自己的情緒。可以看出，人性的脆弱，造成了沖動性犯罪。米爾斯是由於自己的性格，然後被外界因素影響也導致他犯罪，說明犯罪人有些是無法控制自己的性格而導致犯罪，性格也是犯罪的起源之一。
老探員薩默塞特則是辦案的老手，當他看到犯人留下的暴食和貪婪時，知道犯人是以七宗罪來連續殺人，然後就去查看有關七宗罪的書，來猜測犯人的心理和作案方法。說明了，猜測犯人的心理是破案關鍵和線索。
《七宗罪》講述了3個人的故事，表現出犯罪和心理的關聯性。

Ⅳ 急求電影《七宗罪》英文觀後感一篇~~~英文簡單一些，本人英語水平不是很高謝謝!!

Seven," a dark, grisly, horrifying and intelligent thriller, may be too disturbing for many people, I imagine, although if you can bear to watch, it you will see filmmaking of a high order. It tells the story of two detectives - one ready to retire, the other at the start of his career - and their attempts to capture a perverted serial killer who is using the Seven Deadly Sins as his scenario.

As the movie opens, we meet Somerset (Morgan Freeman), a meticulous veteran cop who lives a lonely bachelor's life in what looks like a furnished room. Then he meets Mills (Brad Pitt), an impulsive young cop who actually asked to be transferred into Somerset's district. The two men investigate a particularly gruesome murder, in which a fat man was tied hand and feet and forced to eat himself to death.

His crime was the crime of Gluttony. Soon Somerset and Mills are investigating equally inventive murders involving Greed, Sloth, Lust and the other deadly sins. In each case, the murder method is appropriate, and disgusting (one victim is forced to cut off a pound of his own flesh; another is tied to a bed for a year; a third, too proud of her beauty, is disfigured and then offered the choice of a call for help or sleeping pills). Somerset concludes that the killer, "John Doe," is using his crimes to preach a sermon.

The look of "Seven" is crucial to its effect. This is a very dark film, the gloom often penetrated only by the flashlights of the detectives. Even when all the lights are turned on in the apartments of the victims, they cast only wan, hopeless pools of light.

Although the time of the story is the present, the set design suggests the 1940s; Gary Wissner, the art director, goes for dark blacks and browns, deep shadows, lights of deep yellow, and a lot of dark wood furniture. It rains almost all the time.

In this jungle of gloom, Somerset and Mills tread with growing alarm. Somerset intuits that the killer is using books as the inspiration for his crimes, and studies Dante, Milton and Chaucer for hints. Mills settles for the Cliff Notes versions. A break in the case comes with Somerset's sudden hunch that the killer might have a library card. But the corpses pile up, in cold fleshy detail, as disturbingly graphic as I've seen in a commercial film. The only glimmers of life and hope come from Tracy (Gwyneth Paltrow), Mills' wife.

A movie like this is all style. The material by itself could have been handled in many ways, but the director, David Fincher ("Alien 3"), goes for evocative atmosphere, and the writer, Andrew Kevin Walker, writes dialogue that for Morgan Freeman, in particular, is wise, informed and poetic. ("Anyone who spends a significant amount of time with me," he says, "finds me disagreeable.") Eventually, it becomes clear that the killer's sermon is being preached directly to the two policemen, and that in order to understand it, they may have to risk their lives and souls.

"Seven" is unique in one detail of its construction; it brings the killer onscreen with half an hour to go, and gives him a speaking role. Instead of being simply the quarry in a chase, he is revealed as a twisted but articulate antagonist, who has devised a horrible plan for concluding his sermon. (The actor playing the killer is not identified by name in the ads or opening credits, and so I will leave his identity as another of his surprises.) "Seven" is well-made in its details, and uncompromising in the way it presents the disturbing details of the crimes. It is certainly not for the young or the sensitive. Good as it is, it misses greatness by not quite finding the right way to end. All of the pieces are in place, all of the characters are in position, and then - I think the way the story ends is too easy. Satisfying, perhaps. But not worthy of what has gone before.

Ⅳ 懸疑電影排行榜前十名那幾部電影

懸疑電影排行榜前十名，每個人對待電影都有自己的看法，也都有自己的理解，我來說一下我的觀點，供題主參考一下。這個是不分年代的，不僅僅在於2019哦！
1、《追凶者也》

這部影片講的是黑色幽默。

2、《浮城謎事》

相信這部電影很多人看過，是以都市為背景的。

3、《殺生》

這是一部荒誕懸疑劇，根據小說改編過來的，很值得一看。

4、《無名之輩》

這部電影有很深的社會意義。

5、《你好，瘋子》

這個也屬於荒誕喜劇，故事在精神病院開展。

6、《全民目擊》

這是一部犯罪懸疑劇，一個富豪女兒被綁架的故事。

7、《萬能鑰匙》

這有點兒偵探的意味，對這個感興趣的可以看

一下。

8、《催眠大師》

很燒腦的一部電視劇，不到結尾你永遠不知道

真相是什麼。

9、《心迷宮》

這部片子傾向於邏輯思考，故事情節較為緊湊。

10、《盜夢空間》

這部電影主要是和記憶有關，研究人類的一個夢中的事情，想一想能夠進入到別人的夢中？那是一種什麼樣的體驗？這部電影吊足了觀眾的胃口。