電影亞瑟王的觀後感

Ⅰ 亞瑟拔劍稱王的讀後感

亞瑟拔劍稱王的讀後感
為最大程度還原亞瑟王經典史詩，《拔劍稱王》採用歐美魔幻畫風，歷經多事匠心打造，甫一開篇，便能讓你身臨其境感受中世紀卡美洛大陸的風土人情，同時引領你以第一視角闖盪魔幻大陸，開啟波瀾壯闊的全新歷程。

相傳在百年前，邪惡之力席捲整個大陸，哀鴻遍野之際，亞瑟王集結圓桌騎士團，經過血與淚的漫長斗爭，終於擊敗黑暗勢力統一大陸，人民從此安居樂業、幸福生活。
但是好景不長，亞瑟王為奸臣背叛，身受重傷，不幸與世長辭。覬覦多時的黑暗勢力復甦，曾經統一的大陸重新四分五裂。
眼見光明力量式微，游戲的主角——你，便以救世主的姿態降臨，繼承前人亞瑟王的意志，憑借各色劇情玩法——例如「幻世錄」，接觸到卡美洛諸位英雄人物，與他們結識交談、共同成長，並通過關卡選擇觸發全新故事線，參與各大戰局，最終，帶領這片大陸再度走向和平，譜寫屬於你自己的英雄史詩！

Ⅱ 電影【亞瑟王】觀後感～

影片的人物原形來自15世紀英國最富有傳奇色彩的國王--勒?莫特?亞瑟。亞瑟王更多的感性認識來自神話傳說，他和圓桌騎士的故事，已然是詮釋基督教傳承的文化傳說。歷史學家們對於亞瑟王的國籍和年代問題有很多爭議。本片以歷史學家托馬斯?馬洛里的文稿基礎完成劇本，認為亞瑟王是羅馬人，在英國立下赫赫戰功，正是亞瑟的上台，才讓英國打敗日耳曼部落推翻羅馬帝國的統治，最後贏得了革命性的勝利。我喜歡這部電影，喜歡裡面七個騎士的對自由深切的渴望。這自由面前，生命都顯得不那麼的動人了。在現實生活中，我們在生活的網上爬行，到處都是束縛，卻鮮有人對此斗爭反抗。也許，我們這樣生活了太久，已經意識不到了自由的美麗了。我自認為是個比較懶散的人，不太喜歡太多的規矩，怎麼舒服就怎麼過。最好，逍遙的像個桃下醉仙。顯然，我是在做夢了。雖然，從影評界的角度來說，亞瑟王不能算是頂尖一流，但影片中騎士間超越生死的友誼，草原上大家對自由的吶喊，以及大雪中失去夥伴的悲痛，絕對能喚起人們心中的某些情愫。

Ⅲ 你好，亞瑟王！

​

亞瑟王 斗獸爭霸2017年5月12日正式上映，8月騰訊開播了。不出大家所料，一勺哥又華麗麗的因為加班錯過了上映式。對，大家沒聽錯，是加班！對，大家沒看錯，是周五加的班。但是，你明白的，這都不是重點！！！

8月騰訊一開播，一勺就擠了擠自己可憐的各種卡片，續購了會員。

                                             （此處不是硬廣，此處不是硬廣，此處不是硬廣！！！職業三遍）

說起亞瑟王，他全名叫亞瑟·潘德拉剛（Arthur Pendragon），是英格蘭近乎神話般的傳奇國王，還有個別稱「凱爾特英雄譜中最受歡迎的圓桌武士騎士首領」。好了，先放下這么長的別稱，凱爾特英雄譜是什麼？在歐洲，凱爾特神話與希臘神話並稱，英雄譜上都有太陽神、冥神等一大眾大神，可想一下，能進這其中，而且是騎士的首領，那是相當了得啊。

傳說，亞瑟王在羅馬帝國土崩後，親率他的圓桌騎士統一了不列顛群島後，英格蘭民眾高呼出了那個口號：King Arthur!（亞瑟王、亞瑟王……）

《亞瑟王·斗獸爭霸》電影改編自美國著名文學家、製片人、艾美獎演員集一身的托馬斯·馬洛里的《亞瑟王之死》。電影由執導過《秘密特工》和《大偵探福爾摩》的蓋·里奇導演執導，講訴了青年亞瑟在父親的得力助手梅林等人的幫助下，得到了那把「王者之劍」，握著一把可以統治整個英格蘭的劍鏟除了「獸人」叔叔，戴得皇冠。

這個傳奇式的亞瑟王被改成電影並不是第一次了，但每次除了堅毅的眼神和典型帥氣、超man歐洲人的臉龐一致外，那種導演和製片人想傳達給我們的氣味已越聚越豐富了，對，你們懂的，一勺哥說的是感覺。

亞瑟王·斗獸爭霸除了開頭和結尾各十分鍾左右的超炫特效外，絕大多場景都是貼近古羅馬末期的角鬥士風格的，看過《斯巴達克斯》的人應該更能理解這種感受，感覺整部電影大段的敘述很生活，真實感十足。少年到青年的亞瑟王成長導演僅用了不到3分鍾呈遞給觀眾，我們可以看到亞瑟王的成長歷程極其普通，他在妓院長大，斗毆、坑蒙拐騙、耍心機藏錢，平凡的簡直和現在社會的三流人一般。

那麼是什麼最終塑造了偉大而又傳奇的亞瑟王呢？是「獸」？是社會責任？是復仇的心？這可能正是每部亞瑟王電影的魅力所在。也是我們很多人值得深思的地方。每個人都可以成功，不是嗎？當然亞瑟王是天命所歸了（這是後話）。不同導演傳達出了不一樣的亞瑟王，每個觀眾也將會感受到多面的亞瑟。本片《斗獸爭霸》中，一勺哥不但感受到了一股濃濃的苦難、絕境與浴火重生；也被獸性、貪婪、無下限沉淪深深的傷害了一萬次（你們也自己去感受一下人沒有下限可以到什麼程度，比對一下自己無下限到幾級了）。一勺哥就很不反感宣傳片的那句話「從一無所有到聖劍在手」，自己感受一下。

也許，是上天註定讓亞瑟從被詛咒的巨石中拔出那把天命之劍（石中劍銘文「Whoso pulleth out this sword from this stone and anvil is ly born King of all England」，翻譯：凡能從此石中拔出此劍者，便是英格蘭之王），手握後來的王者之劍報自己嗜親之仇，解百姓於水火，這可能是亞瑟的宿命，和我們每個人一樣，來到這個世界總有上天的宿命一樣。

一勺哥會告訴你自己的宿命是什麼嗎？

本片雖是一個典型的好萊塢式英雄的誕生歷程，從一個素人在經歷了一系列苦難與烈火灼心後稱王。但一勺哥覺得僅僅為最後亞瑟王和魔、商人甲的終極對話，這個電影你也絕對值得一看。良心推薦以下英文全文，大家自己感受，反正一勺哥已經裱起來了。

先來看看亞瑟王、老亞瑟王（奄奄一息）和魔的對話（一戰封神版）：

魔(亞瑟王叔叔)：I think that sword belongs to me now.

老亞瑟王：Run, Son.

魔：Brother，I think that sword belongs to me now.

老亞瑟王：Whatever price you pay, it will be more than you know.

亞瑟王(心理活動)：You don』t need to run anymore.You don』t need to look away.

老亞瑟王：The sword is yours,son. Take it.

亞瑟王對魔說：

You wanted to know what gave me such drive?

It was you.

You put me in the brothel(妓院，亞瑟王成長的地方).

You cut me on the streets.

I am here now, because of you.

You created me.

And, for that, I bless you(親吻被打敗的惡魔).

You make sense of the devil.

再來看一下一戰封王後的亞瑟王和商人甲的對話（霸氣側漏版）：

甲：While I understand there』s been a change in the leadship of this nation, I am confident that you will still honor the agreement made by your predecessor and my king. We respect leave here with 10,000 young men as agreed(商人的狡詐表現的極好).

亞瑟王：I don』t think so, man.

甲：Excuse me?(輕蔑的)

亞瑟王：Yeah, I don』t think so, mate.

甲：May I remind of you a fleet of 3,000 longships controlling the seas, surrounding your island? It wound be unwise to displease my king.

亞瑟王：I am sorry(依然禮貌有加).

甲：I』m prepared to extend the deadline by a week.

亞瑟王：

No, I mean I』m sorry.

You』ve made a mistake.

You』re no longer dealing with the man you previously met.

You are addressing England, and all the subjects under her king』s protection.

So you have a choice.

You can now kneel to England or I』ll step off this throne and you can deal with me as the man you previously met.

And we can see how that goes.

甲：ehe……

亞瑟王：

Well, now that』s out the way. Let』s eat.

Why have enemies, when you can have friends?

甲：跪……

最後，給大家一個 彩蛋 ，看看底下這是誰？還不抓緊去看這個電影？

Ⅳ 亞瑟王 英語影評

Rule your fate.

It』s 300 A.D. and the Sarmatians to the east of Britain are all that』s left of a warring cavalry. So impressed with their agility and prowess at battle, the Romans decide to spare them their lives in return for just one little favor. All their young sons and their son』s sons are taken from their families and forced to serve as knights for Rome for 15 years each. Of course, they may return at the end of their service to Rome, unless they happen to die in battle, which will most likely be the horrible outcome.

It is into this dreary and sad history we are introced as Lancelot (Loan Gruffudd) is shipped off from his village as a pre-teen boy knowing full well he will never see his family again. It is a rough life. A life or death struggle just to make it through each 24 hour period.

As the dawn of his 15 year servitude crests, we are forced to engage with Lancelot in his final bloody battle before his freedom papers are given him, and he may return home a free man. Miraculously, Lancelot and his forged family of knights have survived this tour of ty to Rome! They have lived and died along side one another in these years under Roman Christian rule. There are but these brave left: Galahad (Hugh Dancy), Dagonet (Ray Stevenson), hawk-loving Tristan (Mads Mikkelsen) — and Arthur (Clive Owen), to whom they have all have pledged their iron-clad allegiance.

It is with high hopes they travel to meet with the Pope』s advocate to accept their papers to travel through Roman Britain unharmed under the protection of His Grace. Unfortunately for them, the home office in Italy has one more campaign for them to run, and if they are successful (which means if they don』t die while carrying it out) then, and only then, will they finally be allowed to quench their thirst for freedom.

Arthur, who had a Roman father and British mother, is an idealistic Christian soldier who truly believes God has sent him into this world to protect and win in Roman battles. He finds through the course of this final campaign, that Rome is not the place of equality and freedom his most beloved father had imbibed within him. The realm he so honorably served and protected for these past grueling years in fact no longer exists. The film traces Arthur』s evolution from idealistic dreamer to practical hero.

We do get a glimpse of the famous Round Table within the walls of the British castle/fortress to which Arthur refers is round 「..for men to be men they must all be as equal」 showing no head at this table, but an equal place for all. He also prays in earnest to God to have his life the sacrificed rather than any of his men, so that they would be able to return to their homes and families.

Lancelot, his most trusted friend, overhears this plea and asks why he beseeches this 'God' and not confide in him instead. Arthur responds that it is his faith that protects him. Lancelot responds by saying he trusts no man on his knees. Arthur shows true humility and says perhaps his prayers will put an end to this war. Being the realist he is, Lancelot sadly states there will always be battles in this world.

These knights willingly go off upon this one last mission, not because of their allegiance to Rome, but because of their respect and honor to Arthur. It is here that the sacrifice of faith and friendship is demonstrated in these brave men. Into the grip of the Saxons who have pillaged, raped and murdered their way across Britain they ride to rescue a Roman royal family and bring safely back the son, Arious, to the safe haven of the Roman Pope. They are ambushed in the forest by a fierce warrior tribe of Woads led by a mystical Merlin, but much to their surprise, are spared their lives.

Arthur and his men find the servants being flogged, beaten and tortured in a ngeon at the home of the Roman official he has been charged to rescue and is appalled this is being done in the name of Christianity. It proves more than just the honorable thing to do now, but the real Christian thing to do is save his British countrymen from the very rulers they have placed their faith in to protect them. Arthur also frees and falls in love with a beautiful, confident Woad princess, Guinevere (Keira Knightley). In this telling, Arthur and Guinevere are true loves and Lancelot, though smitten with Guinevere, never makes any advance towards her.

The Saxon army is headed by the ruthless warrior king Cerdic (Stellan Skrsgard) who will stop at nothing in his rampage of killing and burning to eventually meet and defeat Arthur and his knights. The scene where the seven knights aided by Guinevere』s expert archery, face down a whole battalion of 500 Saxon』s on a frozen river bed, is well worth the price of admission.

We are shown the 'real' account of Excalibur and how this sword of renown was actually pulled from the burial mound of his father by Arthur as a young boy, to be used later in his soldiering life to avenge the death of his mother.

This is no fairy tale account of King Arthur, but an attempt at realism — probably more like the rugged lives actually lived back in this ancient time. Although the writers did take many liberties with the classic legend, who King Arthur really was is so clouded by now, who is to say this account is not more closely woven to reality.

LANGUAGE, SEX AND VIOLENCE: The battle sequences are vividly graphic and lengthy, therefore I would not suggest this film for children under 13. There was some use of medieval swearing, but it seemed appropriate for the movie』s theme of reality. The film included a scene where rape was inferred, but nothing actually seen. There is also a sex scene between Arthur and Guinevere — sadly, just an act of lust and not the true love for which the story really called.

Over the course of its blood thirsty battles and through to its conclusion, this film provides a somber look at how Christian ideals can be abused — crushing and breaking innocent lives in the process. As history has often proved, it takes but one brave and committed human being to change the course of the times and bring relief to those who are harshly oppressed.

In the end, Arthur acknowledges that his best friend Lancelot gave his life for the freedom of others. He decrees that 「deeds in themselves are for nothing except they be lead by a higher power.」 Many have given their lives throughout human history for a better existence for all. As Christians we are finely tuned to the sacrificial death of our Savior, Jesus, for the sins of all mankind. How relevant the truth that there is no greater love than a man who gives his life freely for the sake of his friend』s. Through to the end Arthur never gave up his belief in God, even when other』s questioned, Arthur』s faith remained strong and true. I found this the best, most profound example over all.

Ⅳ 電影《亞瑟王：斗獸爭霸》好看嗎

專屬蓋里奇的亞瑟王
文/夢里詩書

蓋里奇的執導加上亞瑟王的故事，本預想《亞瑟王：斗獸爭霸》會是一部如同《指環王》般的傳奇史詩，可未曾料想整部電影雖然在製作上無可挑剔，但那差強人意的劇情使電影難談驚艷，而蓋里奇在這部電影所做的也證明了自己的風格並不適合史詩的格局。

談及蓋里奇，與之相對應的便會是那特有的黑色幽默，從《兩桿大煙槍》到《偷拐搶騙》,再到《大偵探福爾摩斯》的顛覆性改編，其實都能讓人看到他是一位個人風格尤為強烈的導演，而其在這部新作中，當然也不會滿足於只是往一個古老的故事裡注入些許幽默元素那麼簡單，就電影對比原有的故事來說，電影往這個故事裡融入了非常多新的細節，這也成為了他能將自己的風格帶入到這個古老故事中的契機。

這種顛覆性的創作改編，其實並沒有什麼過錯，可是這樣的做法其實也帶來了兩個尤為明顯的問題，一個是電影對整體節奏的把控出現了失衡，對於一個劇情說穿了就是爭奪王位的故事，過多刻意的閃回穿插，對剪輯與敘事功底的賣弄，使電影從中段開始就變的平庸了起來，而另一個問題則是蓋里奇為了突顯自己的風格，他將電影儼然變的不再是一場本當附有史詩感的煌煌之作，僅是一場個人風格濃厚的蓋里奇電影。

當然這也並不能說《亞瑟王：斗獸爭霸》是一部失敗的作品，對原作大幅改編的手筆，小混混的王者逆襲，恰合時宜的幽默，還是為這個老舊的故事某種程度上賦予了新生，而電影在配樂上也同樣敢於擺脫傳統奇幻史詩的桎梏，那搖滾帶感的節奏如若蒙上你的眼睛，或許你都不會相信自己在看一部古裝片。

總之如果你期待的是一場一如《指環王》般宏大的魔幻史詩，那麼蓋里奇的這部《亞瑟王：斗獸爭霸》或許會讓你失望，但如果你想看的是一場 蓋·里奇電影，那麼你必然能在這個古老的傳奇中發現他的身影。

Ⅵ 書蟲《亞瑟王傳奇》讀後感

亞瑟王傳奇讀後感
The most famous works of life for the epic legend of "The Death of King Arthur," a comprehensive book contains the legendary King Arthur's round table knights search for the Holy Grail story and the heroic feat. Thirteen years in the Ming Hidemune formal closure of Korinomiyatsuko Knight (now Council).
It is now generally agreed that he and historical airborne Warwick County, lord of the same name are the same person, who is also a glimpse of tomorrow Yingzong thirteen years as a Warwick County members, if the two really the same person, then this were later charged with rape, robbery and attempted murder. In other words he was twenty years out of the prison to complete the proceof compilation, "The Death of King Arthur," this feature-length masterpiece of.
"The Death of King Arthur," modeled on the French classics, plus the author's fictional creation of a lot of content and hybridity of some other material for the future generally agree that the book is the most complete description of the literary works of Arthurian legend . At the same time, he, too, the development of English prose narrative epic has made immortal contributions.
我在感受到一生中最有名的著作為史詩式傳奇《亞瑟王之死》，書中全面收錄了亞瑟王圓桌騎士們的傳奇故事和追尋聖杯的英雄壯舉。於明英宗正統十三年受封為郡領騎士(即現在的議員)。
現在人們普遍認同他與歷史機載的同名沃爾威克郡領主是同一人，後者也是於明英宗十三年受封為沃爾威克郡議員的，如果二者真是同一人，那麼此人後來被控強奸、搶劫和殺人未遂罪。也就是說他是在二十年出入於監獄的過程中編纂完成《亞瑟王之死》這部鴻篇巨著的。
http://www.oh100.com/a/201203/67457.html
《亞瑟王之死》以法國古書作為藍本，加上了作者的很多虛構的創作內容，並雜糅了一些其他方面的素材，後世普遍認同此書為最完整地描述亞瑟王傳奇的文學作品。同時，他也對英國散文敘事史詩的發展做出了不朽的貢獻。
The most famous works of life for the epic legend of "The Death of King Arthur," a comprehensive book contains the legendary King Arthur's round table knights search for the Holy Grail story and the heroic feat. Thirteen years in the Ming Hidemune formal closure of Korinomiyatsuko Knight (now Council).
It is now generally agreed that he and historical airborne Warwick County, lord of the same name are the same person, who is also a glimpse of tomorrow Yingzong thirteen years as a Warwick County members, if the two really the same person, then this were later charged with rape, robbery and attempted murder. In other words he was twenty years out of the prison to complete the proceof compilation, "The Death of King Arthur," this feature-length masterpiece of.

"The Death of King Arthur," modeled on the French classics, plus the author's fictional creation of a lot of content and hybridity of some other material for the future generally agree that the book is the most complete description of the literary works of Arthurian legend . At the same time, he, too, the development of English prose narrative epic has made immortal contributions.
我在感受到一生中最有名的著作為史詩式傳奇《亞瑟王之死》，書中全面收錄了亞瑟王圓桌騎士們的傳奇故事和追尋聖杯的英雄壯舉。於明英宗正統十三年受封為郡領騎士(即現在的議員)。
現在人們普遍認同他與歷史機載的同名沃爾威克郡領主是同一人，後者也是於明英宗十三年受封為沃爾威克郡議員的，如果二者真是同一人，那麼此人後來被控強奸、搶劫和殺人未遂罪。也就是說他是在二十年出入於監獄的過程中編纂完成《亞瑟王之死》這部鴻篇巨著的。
《亞瑟王之死》以法國古書作為藍本，加上了作者的很多虛構的創作內容，並雜糅了一些其他方面的素材，後世普遍認同此書為最完整地描述亞瑟王傳奇的文學作品。同時，他也對英國散文敘事史詩的發展做出了不朽的貢獻。

Ⅶ 《亞瑟王》你到底看懂了什麼呢

兇殘的薩克遜大軍兵臨城下，看著滿城手無寸鐵的人們殷切的眼神，亞瑟終於明白自己作為一名騎士的使命——此前多年的征戰，正是為了此刻能夠保衛自己的家園能夠不遭受外敵侵害！料定此戰必死的亞瑟選擇挺身而出並與騎士們道別。當波爾斯與亞瑟隔山相望振臂高喊，都明白這一別很可能就是兩個世界！面對族人叛徒的挑釁，亞瑟隻身一人出城面對整支薩克遜大軍，而薩克遜人首領在與亞瑟簡單的會面之後，也終於找到了a man worth killing。撤退路上的騎士們面對薩克遜人隆隆的鼓聲最終沒有選擇離去，而是再一次和亞瑟並肩作戰！這個片段一直是個人整部電影最喜歡的幾個鏡頭之一：並肩多年騎士們幾個眼神，彼此心領神會。當崔斯坦對自己的寵物鷹說Now you are free的時候，都已抱定了此戰必死的決心，此時騎士們臉上流露出的是視死如歸的豪情。臨戰前亞瑟激勵騎士們的話，道出了亞瑟心中所領會的自由——The home we seek resides not in some distant lands, it』s in us and in our actions on this day!經過一番激戰，最終和黥面人聯手的亞瑟擊敗了入侵的薩克遜人。而蘭斯洛和崔斯坦都在此戰中犧牲。崔斯坦臨死前仰望天空，鏡頭再次給了那隻鷹。也許此時那隻鷹確實自由了，但他的主人卻已經戰死！而這只鷹正如一位離開了戰場的騎士——宿命使然。故事回到影片開頭，年幼的亞瑟激動地跑向河邊向媽媽展示自己製作的貝拉吉烏斯的塑像，洗凈轉身的時候卻發現媽媽已經走遠，如此即如母親一樣的至親，也不能完全理解自己的精神世界。幾位騎士決定追隨亞瑟最後一戰的時候也許並不能完全理解亞瑟心目中的自由世界，但是一路走來，正是由這些諸如梅林、喬斯、Ganis、亞勒多以及他母親這些現實世界裡殘存的善良忠直的人們的相互幫助、彼此取暖、並肩作戰對抗現實的不公和殘忍，才最終保衛了心目中自由的家園！正如影片開頭河邊貝拉吉烏斯對小亞瑟所說：The world isn』t a perfect place, but perhaps people like you, me and them can make it so.
縱觀全片，幾位騎士的形象刻畫得非常鮮明細致，騎士間的性格和關系也非常生動有趣，因厭倦騎士生活而一心嚮往平靜的亞瑟在責任降臨到自己身上時也總是能依靠自身的信仰選擇挺身而出。騎士們為之拼殺了十幾年的不列顛在薩克遜人入侵，羅馬放棄之後，最終亞瑟選擇繼續戰斗終成不列顛人心目中的亞瑟王，也許這正是人生的宿命。

Ⅷ 求一部有關歐洲中世紀的電影。我是學歷史的，老師讓寫觀後感（學術性的），可我很少看電

沙普的挑戰

騎士蒂朗

奧馬爾傳奇

大鼻子情聖

火與劍

浮華榮耀

聖鍾

安拉的使者-----默罕莫德

十字軍

天方夜譚

馬可波羅

終極天將

瑪麗與羅賓

龍之心

亨利五世

地獄騎士

萬世英雄

皇帝的密使

國王之路

理想國

太陽王公

格林瓦爾德

伊麗沙白一世

太陽王--路易十四

高地人

亂世情緣

守夜人

特里斯坦和伊索爾德

TO KILL A KING(叛徒與英雄)

四個火槍手

游牧戰神

MERLIN(梅林的徒弟)[Q]

尼伯龍根的指環

THE MISTS OF AVALON(阿法隆之謎)

海盜傳奇

瘋狂的貴族

聖戰五騎士

匈奴王阿提拉

華倫王子

怪談

JOAN The Maid(聖女貞德監獄篇)

THE HEADSMAN(刀斧手)

亞歷山大·內夫斯基

龍與地下城

鷹狼傳奇

WESTENDER

PRINCE CHARMING

時間線

LANCELOT Of THE LAKE(武士蘭士諾)

黑獅

WOLFHOUND(獵狼犬)

BEOWULF AND GRENDEL(貝奧武夫與怪獸格蘭戴爾)

THE DARK PRINCE(黑暗王子:德古拉)

黑暗時代

黑騎士

THE HEXER(屠龍記)

FIRST KNIGHT(劍俠風流)

麥克白

WARRIOR ANGELS(戰士天使)

Gryphon(鷹怪)

東羅馬的締造者-----------君斯坦丁大帝(BBC)

勇敢的心

Artemisia(慾海輪回)

冬獅

JOAN of arc(聖女貞德)

圓桌騎士

勇敢的皇後

蒙哥拉

十三勇士

理查三世

鐵血武士

傭兵傳奇

羅賓漢歷險記

俠盜羅賓漢(BBC劇)

秘密會議

亞瑟王

馬丁路德

冷血奇兵

劫後英雄傳

第七封印

天國王朝

征服者

Robin Hood Prince Of Thieves(俠盜王子羅賓漢)

亞歷山大大帝

蒙喬莘

終極奇兵[Q]

伊凡雷帝

神的戰士

萬世千秋

The Man Who Would Be King(大戰巴墟卡)

鐵面人

Profession of Arms(職業武器)

奧馬爾傳奇

萬世英雄

新麥克白

英國戰爭(BBC)

江山美人

新月與十字架-十字軍東征(紀錄片)

罪孽的代價

神譴之日

聖戰騎士

Ⅸ 電影《亞瑟王》的英文觀後感，500字左右，不要復制的，自己寫的，加分

Written by David Franzoni (Gladiator) and directed by Antoine Fuqua (Training Day), this film abandons all premonitions of what Arthur was and what he is in all our memories. They do keep some of the same, more recognizable, legends of the king. The Round Table makes an appearance but is not nearly held with as high regard as in previous legends. Also, Excalibur still sits on the hip of Arthur. But there's a different twist here. Where in other legends, Arthur was the son of a poor man who pulled the sword Excalibur from its stone, therefore establishing Divine Right for King of England; here Excalibur is his father's sword. His father is killed in battle and the young Arthur pulls the sword from his father's dead body and carries the sword since. Fuqua decides to use the same imagery as if Arthur was pulling the sword out of a stone but just the idea that Excalibur was pulled from his father's body and he has carried it ever since, establishes a little more depth to the story. And that's where most of the similarities stop. This story is based on historical finds that have been discovered recently that have not been established in other Arthurian literature or film works. Arthur is a Roman that has to serve out his ty to the Roman Empire until he realizes he is fighting for a Rome that is too idealistic to exist. Lancelot is an amazingly gifted warrior who was recruited from a young age to join the conquering Roman army to serve for 15 years. He has more of a friendship with Arthur than a king/knight relationship. Guinevere is not a princess from the neighboring France but an English born slave who is discovered and rescued by Arthur's knights. And Merlin normally considered the lovable magician is more of a rebel ghost who leads a rag tag group of English fighting the Roman Empire. So no, this is not your typical 'Arthur' movie.

But what truly surprised me were not the entirely new interpretations but how well every aspect of the film was done. The cinematography was unbelievable. Most of the shots look like they could have been taken start from artist renderings of Arthurian literature. Breathtaking establishing shots of the snowy English landscape transport you back into 400 AD where nature was virtually untouched and made you wish you could visit this country on holiday. The script for the film was done very well also. There weren't those blockbuster, crappy lines that one would expect from a Bruckheimer film. There wasn't even the one liner, 'Braveheart-like' war anthem when going into battle but a very stirring speech from Clive Owen (Arthur) that made you think 'They better kick some Saxon ass.' And it was funny. Not in the modern way either but they took humor and situations from that era and made it funny to today's audience, a true accomplishment.

But there are two things that make a blockbuster, period piece like this work…the battle scenes and the acting. First off, the acting was very impressive. Fuqua casted relatively unknown actors, besides Owen and Keira Knightly, to play the other pivotal parts in the film. None of the performances seemed forced and all appear to become their characters which was probably easier because they did not have to play the well known characters. These were all new interpretations of Arthur and his knights, allowing them to play the characters as they see fit. Who was impressive though was Knightly. Although I am a fan, I was even more impressed with the way she handled the role of Guinevere. Guinevere is no longer a princess who watches from the background but a warrior of Merlin who contributes greatly to the battles. Not many young, very young (19), actress today can pull off a role where you have to be a gorgeous potential Queen one minute and then a brutal warrior the next. And it was these battle scenes that made the film stand out just that much more. You have to appreciate it when directors and writers try to find new and innovative ways to have a battle scene that isn't two giant armies running at one another, swinging large weapons. 'Arthur' is one of those movies that made you believe these were how battles of that time should have been fought. And they were fun to watch.

All in all, 'King Arthur' amazed me. Very rarely to I walk into a film with such high expectations that they would never be filled. Yea, 'Arthur' surpassed everything I ever imagined.

Ⅹ 亞瑟-斗獸爭霸：影評與劇情解析，強勁史詩抒寫英雄傳奇！

亞瑟王一直都是英國相當知名的故事，在中古世界，充滿魔法、權力、貪婪的世界裡、在貧富懸殊，沒有法律，教育貧瘠的環境中，除了昏君與邪惡外，大家都在期待英雄的出現，由他帶領大家走向光明，不再是黑暗籠罩與強權欺壓，而《亞瑟：斗獸爭霸》（King Arthur: Legend of the Sword）則完全聚焦了劃破黑暗、扳倒強權的層面，這次，我們不僅看到了中古世界的迷人，還有史詩的華美與壯闊。

編劇評價（普通、傑出、精湛、完美）：精湛

皇室中，總會存在一則顛沛流離的悲慘故事，因為對權力的渴望、對王位的野心，一個夜晚的叛亂，王權被奪走、家族被剿滅、還在襁褓中的王子，隨著河水來到社會的基層中，王子可能會被農夫、樵夫、漁夫收養，在電影中，亞瑟（查理·杭南飾）則是在妓院長大。

編劇喬比·哈諾德（Joby Harold）、蓋·瑞奇（Guy Ritchie）、萊諾·威格拉姆（Lionel Wigram）聚焦了許多反派的刻劃，沃帝根（裘德·洛飾）存在一種渾然天成的邪惡氣質，對權力的渴望與野心，不惜犧牲一切取得王位的調性，使他成為了故事中的靈魂人物，他能推動故事的前進，讓我們能夠使用亞瑟的視野體驗故事。

悲劇的王子所面對的不僅僅是沃帝根，同時還必須面對自己的恐懼，他親眼看見自己的父親為了保護血派與王權，而將聖劍拋向空中，插在自己的背脊變成劍座，保護了血派的延續，也是亞瑟唯一的機會奪回王權。

三位編劇在亞瑟因恐懼抗拒力量的部份，也有相當鮮明的刻劃，就像我們被噩夢驚醒，再度閉上眼睛時總會出現噩夢的片段，讓眼睛不趕閉上，但睡意的侵襲，又會不經意的闔上雙眼，如此就在這兩者之間來回，但最後，睡意都會成為贏家，好似亞瑟通過了精神考驗，逐漸地克服恐懼，揮舞著聖劍，對決沃帝根。

亞瑟王曾經被翻拍過數次，但《亞瑟：斗獸爭霸》則將史詩的層面放入了人心，讓殘酷又冰冷的文字，被熱血又澎拜的綻放於故事裡，正邪的對立、王位的角逐、魔法的迷幻，皆壓縮於亞瑟與沃帝根兩個角色中，他們乃這個世界正邪集合體，但在這之中加入了人與情感的層面，史詩是將殘酷歷史美化，仍少了人心的層面，而《亞瑟：斗獸爭霸》則彌補了這項缺點，故事比想像中更加有力，難以從腦中揮去。

導演評價（普通、傑出、精湛、完美）：完美

身兼導演的蓋·瑞奇，他的影像──雄壯，每一個戰爭與打鬥鏡頭都富含扎實的力道，尤其是亞瑟揮舞聖劍爆發潛藏的能力時，影像不遺餘力地綻放，以及亞瑟面臨一對多的情況下，瑞奇則將攝影機放在亞瑟的身後，放大了亞瑟本身，也加強了打擊感。這個中古世界非常真實，就像我們親眼見證了一切，蓋·瑞奇無庸置疑地完成了一部完美的作品。

演員評價（普通、傑出、精湛、完美）：精湛

裘德·洛（Jude Law）就是這則故事中最重要的反派，我曾在影評中提到：故事仰賴於角色，角色中若有反派，那他將是非常重要的關鍵，而裘德·洛則恰恰解釋了這點，渾然天成的邪惡，看著自己的哥哥登基，眼裡只有對王位的貪婪與渴望，容不下一絲地親情，甚至犧牲了自己的妻女與黑暗締結契約，就算掌握權力、坐上王位，卻似乎沒有得到自己想要的，他與背叛、悔恨為伍，只為了鞏固王權，裘德·洛著實演繹了這項特質，如果沒有裘德·洛的帶領，查理·杭南（Charlie Hunnam）對抗邪惡的部份不會如此突出，每一個好演員都能引領故事、引導演員，裘德·洛正是一位絕佳典範。

總體評價（普通、傑出、精湛、完美）：精湛

《亞瑟：斗獸爭霸》是一部相當成功的史詩電影，鏡頭壯闊又寫實，角色與演員完美契合，紛紛展現了史詩的特性，電影能精準呈現史詩的細節與架構，只是非常困難，但《亞瑟：斗獸爭霸》做到了！

​