《撞車》觀後感
影片為我們描畫了一幅發生美國洛杉磯這個多民族、
多文化聚集的大城市市民生活全景
圖。
影片的開始由一起小小的撞車意外，
導出了黑人偵探，
並快速利用鏡頭帶到這次撞車事
件發生的前一天，
然後從這蔓延開來，
分別向我們敘述了幾個主人公在這幾天中所遇到的生
活小事情。
這些事情都有一共通點，
就是不同膚色不同種族的人在發生的瑣事中發生了撞車。
電影的結尾，
在各種文化碰撞的碎片中，
創作者給觀眾們留下了希望。
白人警察在車禍中又
冒死救了那對黑人夫婦的妻子，使黑人夫婦的丈夫免招誤傷
........
故事雖然說的是一次撞車事件的前因後果，但圍繞著撞車出現與之相關的人和事卻交
錯、復雜，它揭示了很多問題，其中，我想談談人與人之間的溝通問題。
人與人的溝通並未隨著溝通方式的越來越多和越來越便捷而有所改善，相反，溝
通變得越來越難和復雜。夫妻、母子、同事、朋友、甚至是不同族裔之間的溝通，都
可能對你的生活產生重要影響。人人都知道溝通不可或缺，卻不知道怎樣去改善它。
片中的探長也說了：「人與人太疏遠了，我們都渴望撞擊，只有撞擊才能讓人感受到
真實的接觸。」當探長對法官說出違心的話，當年輕警察將男孩推出車子，他們都無
奈的踐踏了自己的良心，但是，又能如何，如果換成是我們，我們又能如何做？
在現實生活中，
人們遭受到挫折、痛苦和傷害之後，往往會變得沖動、
偏執甚至也會惡
毒。
人們會將這種積郁在心中的壓力釋放到另一個可能是毫無關系的
「
弱者
」
，
而不去考慮別
人的感受。我們都應該好好地審視自己，看看自己有沒有像影片中的人的心態。關於
種族以及人際交往的問題，雖然現在在社會中也得到了越來越多的重視，但是，卻沒
有得到更多的改善。故事與故事之間，故事中的人物之間，一個故事與另一個故事的人物
之間，
自始至終都在不斷地發生碰撞。這些碰撞包含了信仰、
親情、理念乃至生活習慣和生
活方式的碰撞。
人與人，
人與社會發生矛盾勢必會碰撞，
碰撞之後必然引發各種後果，
有的
可以解決，有的卻無法解決，但我們都要去認真面對。
《撞車》要告訴我們的是：生活在社會的人，
就像大海里的水滴，
不斷運動也不斷發生
關聯。
就像我們的命運，
其實是緊緊相連的，
一個人的行為甚至是思想觀念，都有可以影響
別人的命運，反之亦然。既然如此，人與人之間為何不多些寬容，努力做到相互去理解，讓
社會變得更美好呢？對此，有一個很好的方法，就是認真學習人際溝通與禮儀！
⑵ 求寫電影《撞車》英文影評，，謝謝各位了
The message at the heart of Paul Haggis' "Crash" is admirable and true: as human beings, we are all afflicted with racial biases and a tendency to stereotype those who are different from us, consciously or unconsciously, and this demeans and distorts a great many of our relationships. Thus, we are always ennobled by overcoming our prejudices. I whole-heartedly agree with this message and I believe it is worthy of respect. Unfortunately, in art, no matter how good a message is, it doesn't justify mangling the means used to express it.
The means of a story are character and plot. Strong characters can sometimes save a weak plot, and a compelling plot can sometimes support weak characters, but no story can succeed when both of these elements are dysfunctional. In "Crash," the characters are little more than collections of cultural attitudes: more character types than real human beings. They interact in a highly contrived plot made up of preposterously unlikely coincidences. These coincidences converge in various dramatic scenes which are well performed by excellent actors, and occasionally they even have some good dialogue to work with. But since the characters aren't fully developed, and many of the situations are so pat and improbable, there is no verisimilitude in many of the critical scenes, and thus, no sympathy for the characters, and so, no real drama.
"Crash" has good intentions. In this case, they paved the road to, if not mediocrity, then a more fashionable suburb close by.
⑶ 求一篇電影《撞車》的讀後感，英語的
After seeing this movie, I was able to really understand what "Six Degrees of Separation" means. There is a thread that weaves its way through the landscape of life connecting, influencing, and defining all. This movie is certainly thought-provoking, one cannot watch it without feeling either privileged to have become part of the fabric, or like a fly on the wall - seeing, yet unable to influence or guide. There is almost a sense of frustration at ones inability to be no more than an observer in this movie since it compels you to want to shout in warning, gasp in shock, cry in sorrow, and hold in comfort. "Crash" is definitely not a movie to use as a venue to escape life for a couple of hours, but it is a movie that certainly makes you take a second and third look at who you are within yourself. The actors are surprising not only for their depth of performance, but also because they do not play characters you think you know. I would highly recommend this movie to anyone who likes drama, action, comedic relief, or just an appreciation for a well-thought out movie.
⑷ 《crash》觀後感英文版
In Paul Haggis' Crash, an array of characters live in Los Angeles. Their lives intersect with each other, and they go through an unbearably straightforward series of melodramatic incidents, mainly e to a car crash. The movie as a whole is executed in a pretend-mythical style—astoundingly overused, absurdly glossy spiritual symbols, artificial, inlgent melodramatics instead of genuine humanity and insight. The characters are portrayed as either victimized angels or bigoted demons that repent to become victimized angels.
The movie itself is so clean, manufactured and mass-proced that it feels like a plastic shell. The characters are nothing more than pop abstractions that begin with little-to-none dimension and, paradoxically, lose dimension as they progress. The social and cultural tidbits portrayed here are illustrated in straight, bold, plain lines. Crash's formality feels so out-of-place, so uncomfortable, that even with any redeeming values, it's impossible to forgive.
Now, technically speaking, it's not the worst movie ever made, and it's not the worst of the decade, either. In fact, based on technical guidelines, it's not even the worst movie of 2005. However, in applying the Joe Queenan theory-—that the truly worst movies ever made are the ones that shot for the moon and offshooted; the movies that bugged you; the ones that stuck with you for a long, long time - Crash is really the worst of its year. It is also one of the worst of the decade (only The Village, The Passion of the Christ, Hancock and a few others fare worse). It's wildly visionary approach simply felt like a mammoth-scale failure. It got to me. It bugged me. The whimper this movie got out of such a fruitful idea was simply sad to watch. Any faint merits or respectable attempts for greatness made it seem all the more heartbreakingly terrible—this pretentious, cheap disaster seems so wasted.
The movie is a deformed pastiche of political blindness, soullessness and emptiness. It appeared to me as a lifeless, rushed scam - a movie that feeds off mass consensus of opinion without trying anything revolutionary itself.
Crash is a movie that gives itself the undeserved assertion that it really is revolutionary-—yet it pathetically follows the crowd while it obnoxiously assumes it is leading. This movie could have been so much more—something modest, something in-touch, something relevant--or, at the very least, something tolerable.
⑸ 關於電影《撞車》的影評 以及反映出的美國文化
人性的閃亮
撞車，人性的碰擦。是一部多個小故事聚集的電影。在兩個小時的時間里導演巧妙地故事插在一起。
西班牙裔的修鎖工，有一個五歲的女兒，可愛天真，由於以前的後遺症，害怕槍聲，子彈，躲在床底睡覺。爸爸給她講了一個故事：在他很小的時候遇見了一個仙女，給了他一件隱形的斗篷，使他什麼都穿不透。女孩天真地聽著這樣的故事。爸爸鄭重地對她說：現在要把他送給女兒。脫下一件隱形衣，交給女兒。從此女兒再也不怕任何子彈了。一個美好的故事，為了鼓勵女兒擺脫子彈的陰影。
－－－閃亮之一，父愛的偉大。童話是善良的。
一個阿拉伯裔的雜貨店老闆。門鎖壞了，找修鎖工過來修，換了新鎖，但沒有用，其實是門壞了。與修鎖工起了爭執。第二天雜貨店就被偷了。沒有保險公司能夠賠付。老闆很氣。於是他把所有的帳都算到修鎖工的頭上。於是他帶著一把槍來到了修鎖工的家門口。就在他拿著槍與修鎖工爭論時，他突然舉起槍。而小女兒沖出來：爸爸沒有隱形衣。她撲到爸爸的懷里幫他擋了那一槍。接著是父親撕心裂肺的哭聲，女孩勉強撐起微笑：爸爸，我可以保護你。很慶幸，女兒沒有死。而開槍的老闆也呆了，明明射中了，為什麼？
－－－閃亮之二，女兒的愛。愛的力量大到一切，包括阻止子彈。
一個人呆在雜貨店裡，女兒多莉回來都不知道。老闆對著女兒說: 我碰到仙女了，她是天使。是啊，確實是個善良的小天使。其實他不知道，他的女兒才是他的天使，女兒在買槍的時候，就買了一盒空彈。
－－－閃亮之三，女兒之愛，了解父親，深愛著父親。
黑人導演和妻子在回家的途中被一個白人警察找茬。白人警察借機侮辱妻子。作為丈夫，在面對這種情況下，他除了忍，沒有什麼能做的。然而妻子卻譏諷他沒有能力不能保護她。兩人產生矛盾。其實妻子不知道，丈夫比他承受了更多。
－－－閃亮之四，有時忍是需要承受很多的。
妻子遇到車禍，被卡在車內。白人警察去救她。妻子怎麼也不讓白人警察碰她。因為上次的事情，心中仍存恐懼。白人警察實在受不了，朝女人吼了。這是性命攸關的事情。於是女人妥協了。帶著不安，看著警察一步步幫著她把腿挪下來，把保險帶割斷。當人們把警察拉出車時，警察奮不顧身又回到車里把女人拉出來。女人出來第一件事就是抱著白人警察哭了。
－－－閃亮之五，不管以前的芥蒂，在生死之間，一切都沒有拯救生命來得重要。
⑹ 撞車的英文影評
http://www.imdb.com
看這個網站。。。什麼影評都有。。。上萬字。。。
如果合適的話，就接受了吧。。。
⑺ 看完安全撞車教育電影後寫的讀後感怎麼寫
行人最關注的就是行路安全，橫穿xx時，要走人行穿越道，穿越xx時，養成看交通信號的好習慣。同時，還要注意來往車輛，不要追逐，猛跑，斜穿或突然改變行路方向，大中城市的xx，一般都分成機動車行駛的快車道，自行車，人力三輪車和其他慢行車道。及行人走的人行道。行路時，必須走人行道。在人行道行走時，不要多人並行，在沒有劃出人行道的路段，要盡量靠邊走，這樣才能確保行路的安全。
在說騎車安全，按照交通部門的規定，不要不滿12周歲的兒童，不準騎自行車，三輪車和推拉各種人力車上街，就算滿了12周歲，騎自行車上街也要走慢車道，不能進入機動車行駛的'快車道，也不能在人行道上騎自行車。在沒有劃分機動車，非機動車到的路段，要盡量靠右行駛，不能逆行，也不能到路中間去騎，這樣騎車安全就不成問題了。
還有乘汽車安全，坐公共汽車時，要遵守秩序，在指定地點依次候車，等車停後，先上後下，不要擁擠，不能在車還沒停穩時就搶先上，要扶好把手或椅背防止急剎車，摔倒或撞傷，還有乘車時不能向車外，亂扔雜物，也不能把頭，胳膊，或身體任何部分伸出車外，因為這樣容易被對面來的車或路邊的樹枝刮傷，坐汽車特別是坐長途汽車，不能攜帶鞭炮，汽油，一類的易燃易爆的物品上車。而且下了汽車，要先走到便道上去，如果需要橫穿xx就必須從人行道通過。絕不能一下汽車就急忙奔到xx中間，更不能不等汽車開走就從車前車後往xx中間跑，那樣看不見路上來往的車輛，很容易出事。
總而言之，看了這個安全教育片，我獲益良多。今後也當繼續嚴格遵守交通法規要求，關注自己及他人的安全，珍惜生命中的每一天。
⑻ 求電影撞車英語觀後感120字。謝謝
電影里也是靠了巧合，讓人們又輕輕巧巧地找到了安慰甚至救贖。波斯老男人不知道他開的那一槍是空包彈，小女孩生還的奇跡讓他以為那是他的天使。可是對大多數人來說，明明沒有什麼天使，善與惡都在自己的心裡，只要在這樣灰暗的日子裡生活，前一天的天使也許就是另外一天的魔鬼，誰能碰得到一個真正如小女孩般的天使而得到徹底的解脫？
可是大多數人仍然會讓自己感動並相信那個小女孩的故事，總會有些東西是那麼美好，有著搭救人心於苦難的力量，否則，我們怎麼捱得下去？
⑼ 問電影撞車的影評和經典台詞，沒認真看不懂
有關種族以及人際交往的問題，現在仍然是爭論頗多。哈吉斯利用電影語言，向人們揭示了這種糟糕的人與人之間關系的由來。在現實生活中，人們遭受到挫折、痛苦和傷害之後，往往會變得沖動、偏執甚至也會惡毒。人們會將這種積郁在心中的壓力釋放到另一個可能是毫無關系的「弱者」，而不去考慮別人的感受。
之所以選擇洛杉磯作為故事發生的背景，正是由於洛杉磯的城市特點所決定的。多民族文化在這個城市中相互碰撞著，更容易引發新的沖突。時至今日，種族問題仍然在困擾著這個城市中的居民。為了烘托影片中的思想氛圍，導演哈吉斯將鏡頭中的洛杉磯處理得象一座人間地獄。不過，在影片的結尾的地方，在文化碰撞的碎片當中，創作者還是給觀眾們留下了希望。
哈吉斯希望觀眾們在看這部電影的時候，不要報著「逃避生活」的目的來度過這將近兩個小時的時間。他希望人們都能從自己的內心來檢測一下，看看自己有沒有類似影片中的心態。
令人心情沉重的話題，加上有限的拍攝成本，也許《撞車》將很快的湮滅在暑期的所謂「大片」之中。但哈吉斯和演員們已經做的足夠好了，這是一部值得觀看的影片。
⑽ 求電影撞車的英文觀後感 300字 謝謝
Crash is one of the best movies that I have ever seen. It is so powerful and very well executed. It is a film that I believe all indivials should take the time out to watch just once. This movie intertwines the lives of many unrelated people living together in the city of Los Angeles, California. It all takes place within a 36 hour time period. It focuses on the social and racial tensions that people face every day and it uncovers the negative truths of our shared humanity.
Life moves fast and this is something that all viewers can relate to. As citizens, we are often walking around in our 'own little worlds.' The theme of this film is to take a look at all the different walks of life and it allows us to see things from all points of view, not just our own. Our actions cause reactions. Too often people do not stop to think about how their proceedings will affect others. This film takes things to the extreme and it shows us the consequences that may result.
A tag line for this film is: We crash into each other just so that we can feel something. This is in relation to the fact that we are somewhat robotic in our daily lives. We have to work, some indivials even have to pick up second jobs, many of us are parents, and some of us are still furthering our ecations. The hustle and bustle of daily life can cause us to slowly build resentments we are not even aware of. In addition to the theme of how we can affect others; there is also a piece of this film that shows how many of us are brought to our breaking points.
In some ways this movie did show similarities to the movie American History X. Crash is much broader. However, both of these films address the 'elephant in the room.' They cover topics that people do not like to talk about, but topics that are very real. They are both racially related. They both teach some sort of life lesson and show us things that truly make life meaningful: Love, family, the power of relationships, and respect for others.
There is phenomenal technique within the editing of this film. They weave together the lives of strangers and the transitions are extremely smooth. It can be hard when jumping from one unrelated scene to another and I give the editor of this film a lot of credit. Many of the scenes were filmed multi-camera. There was quite a bit of rearranging that had to be done and I found the editing to be flawless.
The sound effects and soundtrack are also very important elements used in this film. The end of this movie is quite a long 'aha moment.' The events all come full circle and everything that had been unpredictable throughout the film now makes perfect sense. Sounds help to heighten the intense moments in film. They have done an outstanding job here.
In summary, we live in a society where we must behave in a politically correct manner. But at the end of the day, we all see the world from our own perspectives. This is the reality. I found this film to be very real. As a viewer, I can really appreciate this. These are necessary issues to uncover. I feel as though these discoveries can only help us to become better people and better members of society.